Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-06-15Обновлено 2026-06-15

Введение

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

Microsoft recently released its new generation quantum chip, Majorana 2. The company claims the average survival time of qubits on this chip has reached an astonishing 20 seconds, a 1000-fold improvement in reliability over the previous generation. Based on this, Microsoft made a bold statement: "By 2029, we will have a commercially valuable, scalable quantum computer." Just last year, the mainstream industry expectation was "ten years from now." Now, Microsoft has directly halved that timeframe.

In the R&D process of this chip, Microsoft heavily leveraged its own AI platform "Microsoft Discovery's" agentic AI, allowing AI teams to collaborate like human research teams, autonomously analyzing massive experimental data, proposing hypotheses, and optimizing manufacturing processes. One is the hardware breakthrough in quantum computing, the other is the software assist from artificial intelligence. Two of the most cutting-edge fields are now reinforcing each other.

What is a Quantum Chip?

A quantum chip manipulates qubits (quantum bits). A qubit can exist in a superposition of 0 and 1. Before measurement, it's like a spinning coin, simultaneously carrying the possibility of both 0 and 1. The superposition state of two qubits can encompass four possibilities: 00, 01, 10, 11; three qubits correspond to eight possibilities... and so on. The quantum state of n qubits is 2^n-dimensional. Through carefully designed operations, quantum gates (the logical gates in quantum computing) manipulate the phase of the quantum state, causing probability amplitudes to interfere within the superposition, thereby amplifying the correct answer. This is why quantum computers are said to possess "exponential computational power."

Furthermore, two entangled qubits share a peculiar correlation: measuring one instantly determines the state of the other, regardless of the distance between them. By leveraging these quantum properties, quantum computers are expected to tackle tasks that are difficult for classical computers to perform efficiently.

A quantum chip is a specialized processor used to generate, manipulate, and measure these qubits. It doesn't use traditional transistors but employs superconducting circuits, trapped ions, photons, or even topological materials to capture quantum states and make them perform calculations according to a prescribed logic, i.e., quantum gates.

Weaknesses of Quantum Chips

Despite their power, qubits possess a fatal weakness: extreme sensitivity and fragility.

The superposition state of a qubit can collapse instantly into a definite 0 or 1 when subjected to even minor external disturbances, such as temperature fluctuations, electromagnetic radiation, or cosmic rays, thereby losing its parallel computing capability. This phenomenon is called decoherence.

Before Microsoft's Majorana 1 chip, the typical lifetime of mainstream superconducting qubits was only tens of microseconds. This meant they would often 'die' shortly after being prepared, before much computation could be done. Therefore, a key metric for evaluating a quantum chip is the qubit lifetime, also known as coherence time.

Microsoft's claim of a 20-second qubit lifespan has caused an earthquake-like reaction within the industry. For quantum operations, 20 seconds is an astronomical figure. Performing a quantum gate operation only requires a microsecond (one-millionth of a second). Twenty seconds theoretically allows for twenty million operations, enough to run fairly complex quantum algorithms. Microsoft even drew an analogy: "This improvement is roughly equivalent to inventing a phone battery that lasts nearly three years on a single charge, compared to the original one-day battery."

Twenty seconds is just the average; some qubits can even last up to a minute. The previous generation Majorana 1 only achieved a lifetime on the millisecond scale, which is why Microsoft states "reliability improved 1000-fold."

So, how did Microsoft achieve this? The answer lies in its chosen technical route: topological quantum computing.

Microsoft's Secret Weapon: Topological Qubits

Most mainstream quantum chips, like those from Google and IBM, use superconducting qubits. This technology is relatively mature, but to avoid environmental interference, it requires extremely low temperatures, close to absolute zero (-273°C). It also suffers from short lifetimes and is prone to errors.

For 20 years, Microsoft has pursued a different, theoretically more advantageous but more challenging path: topological qubits.

If you punch one hole or two holes in a piece of paper and crumple it up, the paper deforms, but the holes remain. One hole doesn't become two, and two don't become one. The number of holes in the paper is a topological invariant. Similarly, the sequence in which two ropes are braided together is also a topological invariant. Topological qubits leverage this topological invariance to protect quantum information. The information isn't stored in specific particles but in the braiding texture formed by the exchange of positions of quasiparticles (collective excitations in particle systems). This storage method is non-local, meaning small disturbances like noise and heat struggle to disrupt the overall topological structure. Consequently, topological qubits are inherently much less sensitive to environmental noise and far more stable than other types of qubits.

The quasiparticle Microsoft uses has a legendary name: Majorana fermion. In 1937, Italian physicist Ettore Majorana predicted the existence of a peculiar fermion whose antiparticle is itself. This particle hasn't been conclusively discovered yet. In the early 21st century, scientists began searching for its analog in condensed matter physics: a quasiparticle called a Majorana zero mode (MZM). When two Majorana zero modes exchange positions in two-dimensional space, the overall quantum state changes; the order of exchange affects the final outcome, similar to how different braiding methods result in different plaits.

In 1997, physicist Alexei Kitaev, then at the Landau Institute in Russia, first theorized the use of Majorana fermions for topological quantum computing. In 2005, Microsoft established Station Q, with Kitaev as a core member at the time. Microsoft has since been committed to this technical path, investing nearly 20 years. In 2025, Microsoft released the first-generation Majorana chip, proving the principle feasibility of topological qubits. They revolutionarily used a topological superconductor, enabling a novel state of matter for more stable quantum computing. Today's Majorana 2 represents a tangible leap in performance, turning principle into practice.

A key improvement lies in the material change: the first-generation Majorana chip used aluminum for its topological superconductor, while the second generation switched to lead. Lead is commonly used as radiation shielding. Using it as a superconductor can significantly thicken the qubit's shield, protecting the fragile quantum state from cosmic ray interference. This seemingly non-disruptive change, coupled with AI optimization of hundreds of process parameters, ultimately led to the 1000-fold reliability improvement.

However, currently, Majorana 2 only integrates 12 qubits. To achieve a commercially valuable universal quantum computer, the industry consensus is that at least several million qubits are needed. Bridging the gap from 12 to 1 million involves countless engineering and physics challenges. Microsoft's confidence in stating 2029 indicates strong belief in their topological route. Theoretically, the error-correction overhead for topological qubits is much lower than other mainstream schemes. If successfully implemented, they have the potential to mature faster than other approaches.

AI's Contribution: How Agentic AI Accelerates Quantum Chip R&D

Another crucial factor in Microsoft's 1000-fold reliability leap is the "assist" from agentic AI. Microsoft's Microsoft Discovery platform deploys agentic AI, where multiple AI agents can take on different roles, such as data analyst, experimental designer, and literature researcher, autonomously completing scientific research workflows under human scientist guidance.

It starts with the core material of the Majorana chip. The first generation used aluminum as the superconductor, while the second generation switched to lead. Changing materials is a complex chain reaction. The team spent years understanding all the trade-offs. Finding the precise doping recipe required hundreds of experiments. Now, AI can first identify high-probability targets through simulation, ideally reducing the required experiments to just one.

This is just the beginning. Quantum chip manufacturing involves countless aspects: software, architecture, material stack, processes, measurement, etc. Changing one parameter can trigger chain reactions. Human engineers struggle to monitor all variables simultaneously, but AI agents can. Crucially, Microsoft's quantum team has accumulated nearly two decades of vast experimental data, in various formats, held by scientists in different countries with different backgrounds. AI agents can synthesize this data and uncover correlations invisible to humans, as no single person possesses such a broad perspective.

Another AI killer app is accelerating experiments. Creating topological quantum states requires simultaneously adjusting hundreds of voltage parameters, followed by measurement—the most time-consuming and delicate part of quantum computing. Previously, a scientist might take weeks to manually complete one round of measurement. The team tried automation with early machine learning methods but failed. It wasn't until they trained a dedicated AI agent using the Microsoft Discovery platform that they reduced the entire cycle by several orders of magnitude. AI can scan the entire parameter space in parallel, automatically determining the lowest point where everything can function normally and pinpointing it.

Finally, AI also helped solve the "ghost noise" problem. At one point, experimental data was consistently off, and scientists spent a long time troubleshooting without success. Later, an AI agent integrated physical models, device logs, and process knowledge to identify an uncalibrated temperature sensor from the raw data that was subtly corrupting the measurement results.

It's fair to say that without AI's involvement, the 1000-fold performance leap of Majorana 2 might have taken several more years to achieve. This reinforces a growing consensus: quantum computing and artificial intelligence can mutually reinforce each other. AI accelerates the R&D of quantum computing hardware, and future quantum computers will, in turn, boost AI by providing exponential computational power for machine learning.

Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft is not the only player in this arena. The path to the "quantum shore" isn't limited to topological quantum chips; there are also superconducting quantum chips, trapped-ion chips, photonic quantum chips, and silicon spin qubits. Governments worldwide are also ramping up investments. China has large-scale deployments in quantum communication and quantum computing; the US has allocated significant funding to quantum computing companies; the EU has launched its "Quantum Flagship" initiative.

Can Microsoft truly deliver a commercial-grade quantum computer by 2029? Paul Stevenson, a physics professor at the University of Surrey in the UK, commented that Microsoft seems to have made a breakthrough in manufacturing reliable qubits. If the results hold up to scrutiny, the timeline sounds reasonable. However, many scientists are hoping to see more detailed data that has undergone peer review, as Microsoft's related papers on this achievement have not yet completed the peer-review process.

Of course, amidst Microsoft's high-profile announcements and excitement, several questions warrant calm consideration. First, are 20 seconds enough? A 20-second qubit lifetime is indeed a staggering leap compared to tens of microseconds. However, practical quantum algorithms require hundreds of millions or billions of quantum gate operations. Even at one microsecond per operation, 20 seconds only allows for twenty million steps, still several orders of magnitude short of the numbers needed for tasks like cracking RSA encryption or precisely simulating drug molecules. Remember, decoherence is a limit set by physical laws, something engineering can never completely overcome. Second, there's the compilation cost issue. Every time a quantum computer solves a problem, it first requires compiling on a classical computer to translate the problem into a specific quantum circuit, and then solving equations based on the quantum chip's parameters to obtain the electromagnetic pulse sequences corresponding to the quantum gates. This compilation process isn't universal; it's one-off per problem. Moreover, the classical computing power consumed by compilation itself might be comparable to, or even exceed, the cost of solving the problem directly using classical methods. Third, what if the quantum computer outputs a wrong answer? Humans cannot verify it with a classical computer; if they could, they wouldn't need the quantum computer in the first place. If the final answer is wrong, there's no way to know where the error occurred.

The dream of building a commercial-grade quantum computer is like a boot hanging in the air,迟迟不肯落地. One day, even if it lands, it might just be a dull thud. Looking back at the history of science and technology, progress sometimes resembles "willows planted unintentionally grow into shade, while flowers cultivated with great care fail to bloom." What is highly anticipated may not be realized, and breakthroughs might emerge from the most unexpected places.

References

https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/innovation/majorana-2-microsoft-discovery-agentic-ai/

https://www.bluequbit.io/blog/quantum-chips

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj4p7gyvp52o

https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/2035004303467917427?share_code=14f9XN3e5wlBq&utm_psn=2035105136662553502&utm_source=wechat_session&utm_medium=social&s_r=0&wechatShare=1

This article is from WeChat public account: 心智观察所 , Author: 心智观察所

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the key performance breakthrough Microsoft announced for its new Majorana 2 quantum chip, and by what factor has reliability improved compared to the previous generation?

AMicrosoft announced that its new Majorana 2 quantum chip achieves an average quantum bit (qubit) lifetime of 20 seconds. This represents a 1000-fold improvement in reliability compared to the previous generation, Majorana 1.

QWhat is the core theoretical advantage of Microsoft's topological qubit technology compared to mainstream superconducting qubits used by companies like Google and IBM?

AThe core theoretical advantage of Microsoft's topological qubit is its inherent resistance to environmental noise and decoherence. Quantum information is stored non-locally in the topological 'braiding' of quasi-particles (Majorana zero modes), making the qubit state much more stable and less susceptible to disruptions from temperature fluctuations or electromagnetic interference.

QHow did Microsoft's 'agentic AI' system, part of the Microsoft Discovery platform, contribute to the development of the Majorana 2 chip?

AMicrosoft's agentic AI accelerated the research by autonomously analyzing vast experimental data, proposing hypotheses, and optimizing manufacturing parameters. It helped identify optimal material compositions (e.g., switching from aluminum to lead), parallel-scanned parameter spaces to find operational 'sweet spots,' dramatically reduced measurement cycle times, and even diagnosed a 'ghost noise' issue caused by an uncalibrated sensor, compressing years of potential work into a shorter timeframe.

QAccording to the article, what is Microsoft's stated timeline for building a commercially valuable, scalable quantum computer, and how does this compare to the industry's previous mainstream expectation?

AMicrosoft stated it aims to build a commercially valuable, scalable quantum computer by 2029. This timeline is approximately half the duration of the industry's previous mainstream expectation of 'ten years from now' (which, if stated last year, would have pointed to around 2034).

QWhat are two major practical challenges or questions raised in the article regarding the path to a practical, commercial quantum computer, even with a 20-second qubit lifetime?

AThe article raises several challenges: 1) Algorithmic Scale: A 20-second lifetime allows for about 20 million quantum gate operations, but practical algorithms for tasks like breaking RSA encryption or simulating complex molecules may require billions or trillions of operations, leaving a significant gap. 2) Compilation Overhead: Each problem requires a unique compilation process on a classical computer to translate it into quantum circuits and control pulses. This process itself can be computationally expensive, potentially negating the quantum speedup for some problems. 3) Error Verification: It is difficult to verify if a quantum computer's answer is correct for problems that are intractable for classical computers, creating a trust issue.

Похожее

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit53 мин. назад

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit53 мин. назад

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit54 мин. назад

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit54 мин. назад

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit1 ч. назад

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手1 ч. назад

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить CHIP

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение USD.AI (CHIP) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки USD.AI (CHIP).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение USD.AI (CHIP)После приобретения вами USD.AI (CHIP) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля USD.AI (CHIP)С легкостью торгуйте USD.AI (CHIP) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

422 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2026.04.21Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить CHIP

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на CHIP (CHIP) представлены ниже.

活动图片