OpenGradient (OPG): Building Verifiable On-Chain AI Inference Infrastructure

HTX NewsОпубликовано 2026-04-29Обновлено 2026-04-29

Введение

OpenGradient (OPG) is a decentralized AI inference infrastructure network focused on turning AI outputs into verifiable, auditable on-chain data.

OpenGradient (OPG) is a decentralized AI inference infrastructure network focused on turning AI outputs into verifiable, auditable on-chain data. This allows smart contracts to use AI results more reliably and addresses the core issue of making AI outputs trustworthy on-chain. As AI and Web3 continue to converge, this approach opens up new possibilities for on-chain applications and expands what they can realistically support.

On the team side, OpenGradient’s core members come from institutions such as Two Sigma, Palantir, and Google, with experience in AI infrastructure and quantitative systems. Notably, the CTO was Tech Lead of Palantir’s AI Platform (AIP), where he led LLM reasoning infrastructure and AI agent execution. Since its founding in 2024, the project has completed multiple funding rounds totaling approximately $9.5 million, with investors including a16z and Coinbase Ventures.

What sets OpenGradient apart is its approach to verifiable inference. Through its inference engine, developers can call machine learning models directly from smart contracts. The system uses a mix of zkML proofs and Trusted Execution Environments (TEE) to verify results, which are then confirmed at the network level. This setup balances performance and trust, reduces the typical “black-box” concerns around AI, and makes it more practical to use AI in scalable on-chain environments.

The project is already moving beyond the concept stage. Its testnet is live, with working support for smart contract-based AI calls, and both the model repository and SDK are available for developers. According to project disclosures, OpenGradient has processed over 2 million verifiable AI inferences and has 263,500+ unique wallets, with more than 4,400 models deployed and over 500K zkML proofs and TEE attestations generated. It is also fully EVM-compatible. In addition, applications like BitQuant, MemSync, and Twin.Fun helps demonstrate real use cases, while integrations with other AI and on-chain protocols are gradually building out the ecosystem.

From a market perspective, OPG is deployed on Base with a total supply of 1 billion tokens, used for gas, staking, governance, and model usage. Around 19% of tokens were in circulation at TGE, implying an initial market cap of about $34 million. The token is currently trading in the $0.28–$0.31 range, with a circulating market cap near $54 million and an FDV of roughly $280–$300 million. Team and investor tokens are locked for one year, and most other allocations follow a long-term release schedule, meaning there is no major short-term unlock pressure. At this stage, price movement is mainly driven by liquidity and market sentiment. After the initial post-TGE pullback, token distribution appears to be stabilizing, which can support further trading activity.

Overall, OpenGradient offers clear direction in the emerging field of on-chain verifiable AI. It combines early product validation, growing ecosystem activity, and a relatively balanced token structure. With AI still a major theme in the market, this mix of moderate float, early-stage valuation, and real usage gives OPG room to attract attention.

OPG is now listed on HTX, and until April 30, users can join a campaign to share $3,000 in OPG rewards by completing simple tasks such as following and retweeting.

Похожее

After Tokenizing Assets, How to Exit?

After tokenization, a key unresolved issue is providing holders with a reliable exit mechanism, as underlying asset settlement (taking days to months) lags far behind on-chain token settlement. Three primary models for instant liquidity have emerged, differing in their capital structure and efficiency: 1. **Balance Sheet Model (e.g., Grove Basin):** A single, well-capitalized entity (like Sky) provides immediate liquidity from its own reserves. This offers simplicity and deep initial liquidity but is constrained by that single balance sheet's capacity and risk appetite, limiting scalability. 2. **Dedicated Vault Model (e.g., Upshift Clear):** Independent liquidity providers (LPs) fund separate vaults for each supported asset. This decentralizes capital sources but isolates liquidity and capital, which becomes inefficient as the number of tokenized assets grows. 3. **Shared Liquidity Layer Model (Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** Independent capital providers fund shared vaults that can support multiple tokenized assets simultaneously. Capital remains productive between redemptions (e.g., earning yield in DeFi markets). Exits are settled via a competitive RFQ market where market makers bid. The article argues that the shared layer model offers superior capital efficiency and scalability. It transforms exit liquidity from an asset-specific patch into shared market infrastructure, allowing liquidity capacity to grow with overall market participation rather than being fragmented per asset. This is particularly valuable for longer-duration assets like private credit, where reliable T+0 exits can significantly enhance their utility in DeFi.

链捕手2 мин. назад

After Tokenizing Assets, How to Exit?

链捕手2 мин. назад

Anthropic's Triple Moment: Code Leak, Government Confrontation, and Weaponization

This article analyzes Anthropic's recent conflicts and strategic moves following the U.S. government's emergency halt of its new Fable model, citing national security concerns over potential "jailbreaks." The author argues this incident reveals deeper tensions between AI labs, governments, and the software industry. While critics view Anthropic's safety-focused rhetoric as marketing fear, the author suggests it serves as a commercial moat masking the company's core economic imperative: moving closer to end-users and their valuable data to avoid being commoditized. The piece outlines a coming clash between frontier AI labs like Anthropic and established software companies. Labs need real-world usage data for model improvement via reinforcement learning, creating a cycle where better products attract more users and more data. This threatens software firms who, as Microsoft's Satya Nadella warns, risk having their value captured by a few dominant models. Anthropic's controversial policy changes—initially secretly degrading Fable's performance for LLM development and expanding data retention—are framed as assertions of control, justified by its safety narrative. The company's foundational belief that it alone is sufficiently concerned about superintelligent AI dangers legitimizes its actions, from resisting government demands to shaping usage policies. The author concludes that this alignment of mission, talent, and business strategy is powerful but concerning, as it concentrates immense potential power in the hands of those convinced of their own righteous understanding.

marsbit12 мин. назад

Anthropic's Triple Moment: Code Leak, Government Confrontation, and Weaponization

marsbit12 мин. назад

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить OPG

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение OpenGradient (OPG) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки OpenGradient (OPG).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение OpenGradient (OPG)После приобретения вами OpenGradient (OPG) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля OpenGradient (OPG)С легкостью торгуйте OpenGradient (OPG) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

355 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2026.04.20Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить OPG

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на OPG (OPG) представлены ниже.

活动图片