ASTER vs. Hyperliquid: Can USD1’s 34.3% growth shift market leadership?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-04-08Обновлено 2026-04-08

Введение

The market is shifting toward DeFi, with stablecoins acting as a key bridge between traditional and decentralized finance. In this context, Aster’s [ASTER] partnership with WorldLibertyFinancial [WLFI] positions WLFI’s native stablecoin, USD1, as the base layer for ASTER’s perpetual markets and real-world asset (RWA) initiatives. USD1’s market cap grew 34.3% this year, reflecting strong demand for structured, real-world assets. Despite broader market headwinds, the partnership aims to strengthen ASTER’s liquidity and competitiveness. While Hyperliquid [HYPE] dominated Q1 perpetual volume with $620 billion (compared to ASTER’s $318 billion) and saw its token rise 43%, ASTER declined 3.32%. The integration of USD1 could help ASTER narrow the gap with Hyperliquid and expand its presence in both trading and RWA markets.

The market is clearly shifting toward DeFi, and as a result, Layer 1s are rethinking how to stay ahead.

Consequently, it’s no surprise that most strategic partnerships are now centered around stablecoins. By acting as a bridge between TradFi and DeFi, they not only move capital on-chain more efficiently but also reduce friction and unlock access to key growth areas such as RWAs, AI, and NFTs.

In this context, Aster’s [ASTER] partnership with WorldLibertyFinancial [WLFI] fits perfectly. Under this deal, WLFI’s native stablecoin, USD1, becomes the base layer for ASTER’s perpetual markets and RWA initiatives, further reinforcing the broader trend of connecting traditional finance more closely with DeFi via stablecoins.

Source: X

Unsurprisingly, the market reacted quickly. The most buzzed-about response came from Donald Trump Jr. on X, calling the partnership a major “win” for both networks. That said, when we look at the technical positioning, it’s clear this move is about more than just strengthening fundamentals.

On the charts, both ASTER and WLFI have been impacted by ongoing macro FUD, closing near critical support levels that could soon be tested. At the same time, on the longer timeframe, these assets still have a significant way to go before reclaiming early-October price levels.

Naturally, the key question becomes, can this partnership actually drive meaningful price gains? That’s especially relevant when you consider that other DEX tokens like Hyperliquid [HYPE] have managed to stay relatively bullish despite the same macro headwinds.

ASTER bets on USD1 to reclaim ground

When you think of stablecoins, USDT usually comes to mind first.

That said, its technical setup doesn’t always tell the full story. So far this year, USDT’s market cap has only grown about 1.6%. Considering that this period overlaps with roughly a 20% correction across the broader crypto market, it’s clear that USDT flows still influence wider price action.

But capital isn’t just chasing speculation anymore. The RWA market, for example, has grown 35% this year, showing that money is moving into more structured, real-world assets. In this context, USD1’s 34.3% jump in market cap highlights how well-positioned stablecoins are driving real growth, making the ASTER-WLFI partnership a clearly strategic play.

Source: TradingView (USD1)

Meanwhile, a similar divergence is visible in perpetual volume, which has cooled overall. Yet, on a chain-by-chain basis, Hyperliquid still dominates, reporting $620 billion in perp volume in Q1. Oil trading, in particular, has been a key driver, keeping Hyperliquid firmly in the lead even as broader market activity slows.

By comparison, ASTER posted $318 billion over the same period. Technically, that’s almost half of Hyperliquid’s volume. The impact shows in price action too, with HYPE ending Q1 up 43%, while ASTER slipped 3.32%. That said, the WLFI partnership puts ASTER in a position to strengthen its liquidity, potentially improving its competitiveness in the DEX perpetual market.

The main catalyst? USD1. Serving as the base layer for ASTER’s perpetual markets and RWA initiatives, it could be the lever that helps ASTER close the gap with Hyperliquid, creating a stronger presence across both trading and real-world asset markets.


Final Summary

  • USD1 now serves as the base layer for ASTER’s perpetual markets and RWA initiatives, strengthening liquidity.
  • While HYPE dominates perp volume, ASTER’s USD1 integration positions it to narrow the gap and expand its presence in both trading and real-world asset markets.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main focus of the strategic partnership between Aster (ASTER) and WorldLibertyFinancial (WLFI)?

AThe partnership centers on WLFI's native stablecoin, USD1, becoming the base layer for ASTER's perpetual markets and Real-World Asset (RWA) initiatives, aiming to bridge traditional finance with DeFi and strengthen liquidity.

QHow did the market cap growth of USD1 compare to that of USDT, and what does this signify?

AUSD1's market cap grew by 34.3%, significantly outperforming USDT's 1.6% growth. This highlights how well-positioned stablecoins like USD1 are driving real growth, particularly in structured areas like RWA, as opposed to just speculation.

QHow did the trading volume and price performance of ASTER compare to Hyperliquid (HYPE) in Q1?

AIn Q1, Hyperliquid dominated with $620 billion in perpetual volume and its token HYPE ended the quarter up 43%. In comparison, ASTER posted $318 billion in volume (about half of HYPE's) and its token price slipped by 3.32%.

QWhat key advantage does the article suggest the USD1 integration could bring to ASTER?

AThe integration of USD1 as a base layer could serve as a lever to help ASTER strengthen its liquidity, improve its competitiveness in the perpetual markets, and narrow the gap with market leaders like Hyperliquid.

QBeyond speculation, what broader market trend is capital moving into, as evidenced by the growth of USD1?

ACapital is moving into more structured, real-world assets (RWA). The RWA market itself grew 35% this year, and USD1's significant growth is a reflection of this trend towards connecting traditional finance with DeFi.

Похожее

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit25 мин. назад

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit25 мин. назад

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手29 мин. назад

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手29 мин. назад

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

Last Friday, the U.S. Commerce Department issued an enforcement letter that forced Anthropic to take its two most advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline. The stated reason was unspecified national security concerns, initially linked to potential "jailbreaks" of the models' safeguards. However, new details suggest the action stemmed more from a deteriorating relationship between the Trump administration and Anthropic, rather than a genuine technical threat. According to reports, the government cited a little-known export control regulation, compelling Anthropic to block access for all non-U.S. persons, including its own international employees. The company complied, shutting down the models without a court order or specific technical details from the government. Cybersecurity expert Katie Moussouris revealed she was privately shown a research paper detailing a potential safeguard bypass in Fable 5. She argued the described method was minor and did not warrant an export ban, stating that attempts to "fix" it would only weaken the model's defensive capabilities. Moussouris and other experts have since called for the order to be revoked, warning it dangerously removes advanced cybersecurity tools from U.S. defenders. Analysts like Justin Hendrix suggest the move appears retaliatory and sets a dangerous precedent, signaling that the U.S. government can unilaterally shut down a tech company's products. The incident has raised concerns about the reliability of American AI and the potential for political interference in the tech industry, serving as a warning to the broader sector.

marsbit33 мин. назад

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

marsbit33 мин. назад

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

In his latest notes, Ray Dalio addresses a critical question for investors amid the AI-driven stock market surge: how should one allocate assets during a transformative technological revolution? Dalio emphasizes that technological advancement does not automatically make related stocks attractive. Historical tech cycles—marked by excitement, crowding, volatility, and eventual shakeouts—show that even long-term winners like Microsoft and Apple experienced severe drawdowns. Today's AI sector faces similar uncertainties: overinvestment, intensifying competition, geopolitical tensions (e.g., Taiwan's chip supply), tax policy shifts, anti-AI sentiment, and potential disruption from future technologies like quantum computing. Dalio's core argument focuses on the highly concentrated market structure, where a few tech giants dominate major indices. He warns investors against unknowingly holding concentrated, correlated exposures. Instead of chasing a handful of AI leaders, he advocates for a robust, diversified portfolio of 15 or more high-quality, uncorrelated investments, risk-balanced to match an investor's volatility tolerance. Mathematically, such diversification significantly improves the risk-return ratio—for example, holding 15 uncorrelated assets can boost the ratio by over four times compared to a single concentrated bet. Dalio cautions that future equity returns appear low, with his bubble indicator suggesting real returns could be negative over the next 5-10 years. He stresses that knowing what you don't know is as important as knowing what you do. In an environment of high uncertainty and concentration, avoiding large, concentrated bets on AI stocks is prudent. The optimal strategy is disciplined diversification—the "holy grail" of investing—to navigate this technologically driven cycle with lower risk and comparable or better returns.

marsbit36 мин. назад

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

marsbit36 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ASTER

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Aster (ASTER) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Aster (ASTER).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Aster (ASTER)После приобретения вами Aster (ASTER) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Aster (ASTER)С легкостью торгуйте Aster (ASTER) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

814 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.09.25Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить ASTER

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ASTER (ASTER) представлены ниже.

活动图片