$9.3B lost – Can SAFE Crypto Act ‘protect Americans against scams’?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2025-12-18Обновлено 2025-12-18

Введение

A bipartisan U.S. Senate group introduced the SAFE Crypto Act to combat rising cryptocurrency fraud, which cost Americans $9.3 billion in losses last year. The bill establishes a federal task force combining Treasury, DOJ, Secret Service, and private crypto firms to improve enforcement, enhance public education, and coordinate internationally. It requires action within 180 days and aims to replace outdated laws with stronger measures against scams.

As crypto investment scams surge, a bipartisan group in the U.S. Senate is stepping in to close the enforcement gaps that have cost Americans billions.

On the 17th of December, Senators Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and Jerry Moran (R-KS) introduced the Strengthening Agency Frameworks for Enforcement of Cryptocurrency (SAFE) Crypto Act.

The bill arrives at a critical inflection point for the industry. While the primary market has seen increased institutional adoption, the “dark side” of the ecosystem is expanding even faster.

How does the SAFE Crypto Act differ from previous regulations?

Unlike previous attempts at crypto regulation that often bogged down in jurisdictional “turf wars” between the SEC and CFTC, the SAFE Crypto Act is uniquely pragmatic.

It mandates the creation of a specialized federal task force designed to synchronize the response of the Treasury, the Department of Justice, and the Secret Service.

By formalizing a pipeline between law enforcement and private sector blockchain intelligence, the legislation aims to move past reactive policing and toward real-time interdiction of illicit funds.

Remarking on this, Sen. Slotkin said in the statement,

“It’s critical we protect Americans against scams in all industries, but especially cryptocurrency as it becomes more popular.

Slotkin added,

“This task force, established by the SAFE Cryptocurrency Act, will allow us to draw upon every resource we have to combat fraud in digital assets.”

The 180-day countdown

If passed, the SAFE Crypto Act would put the Treasury Department on a strict timeline.

Within 180 days, the Secretary of the Treasury must establish a task force designed to break the traditional “siloed” approach of government agencies.

Unlike past committees that operated strictly within government, this task force will be a hybrid of public and private entities.

It will bring together senior officials from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Secret Service, alongside leading voices from the crypto industry, including exchanges and blockchain intelligence firms.

The inclusion of private‐sector participants is strategic. Regulators recognize that the data needed to track and stop scammers often resides on private ledgers and exchange order books, not in government databases.

Important mandates

The bill also acknowledges a hard truth found in the 2024 FBI Internet Crime Report, and that is the most devastating scams aren’t technical hacks of the blockchain, but “hacks” of the human psyche.

Last year, U.S. residents lost a staggering $9.3 billion to crypto-related schemes, a 66% surge from the previous year.

Most of these losses stemmed from social engineering and “pig butchering” schemes, where criminals spend months building trust with victims before siphoning their life savings.

To counter this growing threat, the SAFE Crypto Act mandates that the newly formed task force meet at least three times a year, focusing on three critical areas.

First, it must design advanced public-education campaigns that mirror the techniques scammers use, helping consumers recognize and resist increasingly sophisticated frauds.

Second, it will coordinate closely with foreign governments to target global “scam hubs” operating beyond U.S. borders.

Finally, within one year, the task force must deliver a comprehensive report identifying which existing laws have become ineffective, or “toothless”, against nonstop, 24/7 digital fraud, and recommend the legislative fixes needed to close those gaps.

€700M scam exposed

Recently, authorities dismantled a massive international cryptocurrency fraud and money‐laundering network. The group was responsible for stealing more than €700 million.

The first raid, conducted on the 27th of October, resulted in nine arrests. It also resulted in the seizure of over €1.5 million across Cyprus, Germany, and Spain.

In the second phase, investigators turned their attention to the affiliate marketing networks behind the scams. This operation shut down ad‐tech firms that had been funneling victim data.

Taken together, these coordinated actions represent a major global victory against organized cyber‐fraud. Investigations continue, and asset recovery efforts remain underway.


Final thoughts

  • By mandating a unified federal task force, the bill finally breaks the long-standing silos between Treasury, DOJ, Secret Service, and private blockchain intelligence firms.
  • With a one-year deadline for identifying weak laws, lawmakers are signaling that U.S. crypto-fraud policy is about to undergo its most significant overhaul yet.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the primary goal of the SAFE Crypto Act introduced by Senators Slotkin and Moran?

AThe primary goal of the SAFE Crypto Act is to protect Americans against cryptocurrency scams by establishing a specialized federal task force to synchronize the response of agencies like the Treasury, DOJ, and Secret Service with private sector blockchain intelligence for real-time interdiction of illicit funds.

QHow does the SAFE Crypto Act propose to break the traditional approach of government agencies?

AThe Act mandates the creation of a hybrid public-private task force that brings together senior officials from government agencies and leading voices from the crypto industry, such as exchanges and blockchain intelligence firms, to break the traditional 'siloed' approach.

QAccording to the article, what was the total amount lost to crypto-related scams in the U.S. last year and what was the primary method used?

AU.S. residents lost $9.3 billion to crypto-related schemes last year, a 66% surge from the previous year, with most losses stemming from social engineering and 'pig butchering' schemes.

QWhat are the three critical areas of focus for the new task force as mandated by the SAFE Crypto Act?

AThe three critical areas are: 1) Designing advanced public-education campaigns to help consumers recognize fraud, 2) Coordinating with foreign governments to target global 'scam hubs', and 3) Delivering a report within one year identifying ineffective laws and recommending legislative fixes.

QWhat recent international enforcement action against crypto fraud does the article highlight as a major victory?

AAuthorities recently dismantled a massive international cryptocurrency fraud and money-laundering network responsible for stealing over €700 million, resulting in nine arrests and the seizure of over €1.5 million across multiple countries.

Похожее

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit52 мин. назад

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit52 мин. назад

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit53 мин. назад

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit53 мин. назад

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit1 ч. назад

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手1 ч. назад

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить SAFE

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Safe (SAFE) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Safe (SAFE).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Safe (SAFE)После приобретения вами Safe (SAFE) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Safe (SAFE)С легкостью торгуйте Safe (SAFE) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

360 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.04.23Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить SAFE

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на SAFE (SAFE) представлены ниже.

活动图片