Trump nominates Michael Selig as new CFTC chair – Details here!

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2025-10-24Обновлено 2025-10-25

Key Takeaways

Why is Michael Selig’s nomination as CFTC chair significant for the crypto industry? 

His appointment signals a more coordinated and crypto-friendly regulatory approach, aligning with efforts to expand CFTC oversight of digital assets.

What broader shift does Selig’s nomination reflect in U.S. crypto regulation? 

It highlights the Trump administration’s move toward integrating crypto into mainstream financial regulation and resolving jurisdictional conflicts between the SEC and CFTC.


U.S. President Donald Trump has reportedly chosen Michael Selig as the next chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), according to Bloomberg, citing an administration official.

Selig currently serves as chief counsel for the CFTC’s crypto task force and has been working closely with SEC Chairman Paul Atkins.

His appointment suggests a more coordinated and crypto-friendly approach to financial regulation under the Trump administration.

Michael Selig, the new CFTC pick 

Michael Selig, currently chief counsel for the SEC’s crypto task force, has played a key role in shaping digital asset policy to align with the SEC’s broader regulatory goals.

His nomination to lead the CFTC comes at a critical time, as Washington finalizes a national crypto market structure framework that could expand the CFTC’s oversight of digital assets.

This marks President Trump’s second attempt to appoint a CFTC chair, following the failed nomination of Brian Quintenz.

Quintenz’s confirmation was declined due to Senate resistance, despite his role as global policy head at a16z Crypto and support from industry leaders, including opposition from Gemini co-founders Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss.

Remarking on the same, Amanda Tuminelli, executive director of DeFi Education Fund, said in a statement, 

“Mike Selig is a well-respected lawyer and industry expert. He understands the tech and the need to allow room for innovation, but also cares about getting to the right legal answer.”

Echoing similar sentiments, Jake Chervinsky, chief legal officer at the Variant Fund, added

“There’s nothing more important for crypto policy than the White House nominating a new CFTC chair and nobody better than Mike Selig for the job.”

He added,

“I’ve had the honor of knowing Mike for years and he’s the real deal: a brilliant lawyer and proven leader perfect for this role.”

If confirmed, Michael Selig’s appointment could signal a turning point in how Washington approaches cryptocurrency regulation.

What’s more?

Selig, who joined the CFTC in March 2025 and previously served as a partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher, has been instrumental in fostering cooperation between the two agencies on digital asset and broader financial policy.

His nomination reflects the Trump administration’s evolving stance on crypto integration within mainstream financial regulation. 

However, his confirmation still hinges on Senate approval, which will ultimately determine whether the U.S. can move toward a more cohesive and unified regulatory framework for its crypto markets.

This coincided with the SEC and CFTC jointly clarifying that U.S. laws allow certain spot crypto trading, marking a major step toward mainstream adoption.

Experts say crypto could soon appear on major exchanges like NYSE and Nasdaq, ending “turf wars” between the two regulators.

Share

Похожее

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Author David Hoffman, founder of Bankless, explains his decision to sell all his ETH, despite being a prominent figure in the Ethereum ecosystem. He clarifies that his move is not a bearish take on Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about as a network. His core argument is that the "ETH is money" thesis, which he helped popularize, has largely played out. Hoffman argues that ETH has achieved the market valuation it deserves based on Ethereum's current success and competitive position. He details several reasons for this view. First, the path for ETH to become global money required nearly flawless execution and sustained dominance across Ethereum's entire technical and social stack—a coordination challenge he now believes had a narrower window for success than anticipated. Second, market data shows a strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and the price of its native asset; Ethereum's fee dominance has been challenged by competitors like Solana. Third, the "strong version" of crypto (decentralized, native crypto economies) that ETH's monetary thesis relied upon has struggled to maintain a positive mainstream narrative and stable adoption beyond a brief period. Finally, Ethereum's architecture as a "giver"—providing secure block space and tokenization capabilities at cost to L2s and applications—means it doesn't capture premium value directly. Its rollup-centric roadmap further directs most profits to L2s and applications ("fat app theory"). In conclusion, Hoffman believes the opportunity for ETH to be revalued significantly upward as money has diminished. He sold not because ETH will fail, but because its monetary thesis has matured, and he seeks to allocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

链捕手1 ч. назад

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

Circle raised $222 million for its proprietary Layer-1 blockchain, Arc, positioning itself not just as a stablecoin issuer but as the owner of the settlement infrastructure USDC relies on. This move, backed by investors like BlackRock and Apollo, highlights a significant structural conflict unaddressed by the GENIUS Act of 2025. While the act focuses on stablecoin reserves and issuer oversight, it remains silent on the market structure implications of an issuer controlling the underlying network—a scenario akin to a currency issuer also owning the payment rails. Traditionally, financial regulations separate issuers from settlement infrastructure to ensure neutrality. With Arc, Circle gains control over transaction ordering, fees, and network rules, potentially favoring USDC over competitors. The article argues that this creates a permanent structural temptation, even if no abuse occurs. The solution lies in applying established market infrastructure principles: mandating neutral transaction ordering, transparent fee schedules, and governance separated from Circle’s commercial interests. The current pre-mainnet phase offers a critical window for regulators to establish these rules before Arc becomes entrenched. Once operational, enforcing changes would be costly and disruptive. The core question remains: should a regulated stablecoin issuer be allowed to own the settlement network its competitors must use? The GENIUS Act doesn’t answer this, but Circle’s Arc strategy makes it urgent.

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

marsbit1 ч. назад

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

Title: What Determines the AI Bull Market? Key Variables Revealed Despite rising oil prices above $100/barrel, persistent inflation, and fragile Fed rate cut expectations—a traditionally hostile environment for high-valuation tech stocks—the AI sector continues to drive the market to new highs. According to analysts, the current AI boom is in a phase of "rational fervor": while bubbles exist, they are not yet out of control. The crucial shift is the emergence of Agentic AI, which is evolving from an assisting tool (Copilot) to an autonomous execution tool (Autopilot), creating a clearer commercial path from investment to revenue. This shift accelerates Token consumption and inference computing demand while boosting revenue forecasts for leading firms. The market is now rewarding capital expenditure as it transforms from a burden into a competitive moat, supporting hardware chains like GPUs, optical modules, and storage. However, valuations have already priced in growth expectations for 2027-2028. The forward P/E ratio for the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants is about 35x, compared to 25x for the rest of the S&P 500. This premium implies AI adoption must occur 5 to 8 times faster than past technological revolutions—a scenario with little room for error. The sustainability of the AI bull market hinges on three key variables: 1. **Short-term liquidity shocks**: Risks include sustained high oil prices, resurgent inflation, rising interest rates, and potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. The critical question is whether the upward revision speed of Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) can outpace the rise in interest rates. 2. **Mid-term industry realization**: Can the actual pace of AI adoption and commercialization match the current lofty valuations? Historically, general-purpose technology revolutions follow a non-linear path with periods of acceleration and deceleration. 3. **Long-term structural constraints**: These include energy and power grid limitations, employment displacement and consumer purchasing power, social acceptance and potential backlash, and potential hardware technology breakthroughs that could disrupt current supply chains. While the long-term prospects for AI remain optimistic with potential for significant productivity gains, the stock market's pricing depends not just on the vision but on the actual speed of realization amid these growing constraints. The direction is clear, but the pace of execution will determine whether the bubble remains controlled or spirals out of control.

marsbit1 ч. назад

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片