Solana’s co-founder drops Percolator Perps DEX, dares devs to ‘steal’ it

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2025-10-21Обновлено 2025-10-21

Key Takeaways

What is Percolator, and why is it gaining attention?

It’s a high-speed, open-source perps DEX on Solana. Yakovenko has invited developers to copy and compete with it.

Is Percolator ready to launch?

Not yet. Core parts are functional, but key components like liquidation are still in progress.


Solana [SOL] co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko just dropped a surprise.

On the 19th of October, detailed GitHub docs revealed Percolator, a decentralized perpetuals exchange (perps DEX) that Yakovenko has been building.

The open-source protocol is already drawing attention… and not just for its design.

What is Percolator?

Percolator is built natively on the Solana blockchain, and aims to deliver lightning-fast performance through a unique “slab” system; a sharded matching engine that processes trades in parallel.

Source: Github

It also features on-chain tools for managing positions, tracking collateral, and calculating margin, all without relying on centralized services.

It was released as an open-source, implementation-ready prototype on GitHub.

Is this the next big thing?

While platforms like GMX, dYdX, and Hyperliquid dominate the perpetuals trading space, Solana has yet to claim a clear leader in this $210 billion market.

Percolator, with its supposed high-speed architecture and on-chain, user-focused design, has the potential to give Solana a serious edge.

If it delivers on its promise of performance and capital efficiency, it could become a core piece of Solana’s DeFi stack.

This would help Solana evolve into a real competitor in the perps race.

Open source or open season?

Here’s where it gets interesting. Percolator is openly being offered up for the community to fork, copy, and compete with.

Yakovenko even encouraged developers to “steal” the idea, framing it as a push for open innovation in DeFi. The response was instant, with many submitting pull requests or announced plans to build their own versions.

Source: X

But who owns an open-source protocol? And if someone else profits off a fork, does the original creator get credit or compensation?

Perhaps we’ll find the answers in real time.

Where does the project stand now?

Percolator is getting attention, but it’s still a work in progress. GitHub shows that core parts like the Router and slab matching engines are already working.

Other features, like the liquidation engine, are still being built. Yakovenko even used the AI tool Claude to help write the first version of the documentation.

It’s not ready to launch yet, but the basics are there… and interest in the project is growing quickly.

Share

Похожее

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

The article profiles two prominent figures, Serenity and Leopold Aschenbrenner, who are gaining attention for their unconventional investment strategies focused on the physical constraints of the AI boom, moving beyond mainstream software narratives. Serenity, an anonymous online trader, advocates a "shiso leaf" theory. He targets small-cap companies with monopolies on critical, overlooked components in the AI hardware supply chain, such as specific semiconductor materials. His deep, technical analysis of bottlenecks in areas like co-packaged optics (CPO) has reportedly yielded massive returns, though his anonymity and focus on illiquid micro-cap stocks pose significant risks for followers. Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI researcher, founded a multi-billion dollar hedge fund. His macro thesis argues that physical infrastructure—power grids, land, data centers—is the true bottleneck for AI growth, lagging far behind chip production. Consequently, his fund employs an infrastructure arbitrage strategy: heavily investing in storage and compute infrastructure companies while placing massive bearish bets (put options) against major semiconductor stocks, betting their valuations will correct as physical constraints become apparent. While their methods differ—Serenity drills into microscopic supply chain details, while Leopold takes a macroscopic, infrastructure-focused view—both share a core belief: the real power and investment alpha in the AI era lie in controlling scarce physical resources, not just software. The article concludes by noting the inherent risks in both approaches, such as liquidity issues for micro-caps and timing risks for macro bets, but suggests they signal a broader market re-evaluation of AI's foundational assets.

marsbit2 мин. назад

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

marsbit2 мин. назад

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

In the Agents era of blockchain, traditional value capture theories face challenges. The "Fat Protocol" theory, dominant since 2016, suggested protocols capture most value as their tokens are essential for network use. However, the proliferation of interchangeable L1s, L2s, and modular layers has eroded protocol scarcity and pricing power. Conversely, the "Fat App" theory posits that applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and exchanges) become the primary value layer by controlling distribution and transaction flows. This aligns with the current "Great Repricing" cycle. Agents disrupt this logic. As software users, they lack brand loyalty, prioritize cost and efficiency, and switch between platforms seamlessly. This undermines the front-end UX moats that "Fat Apps" rely on. The article explores several potential futures: 1. **Headless Applications:** Current leading apps could strip their front-ends and become backend API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their role. 2. **Protocol Resurgence:** If integration becomes trivial, Agents might bypass aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving "Fat Protocol" dynamics. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse:** Agents' rational, frictionless routing could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost and leaving little profit for intermediaries. 4. **Unprecedented Activity:** Agents may enable new, high-frequency, machine-to-machine economic activities, expanding the total value pie even if margins are thin. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model:** Historically, major tech shifts (like the internet's attention economy) create unforeseen business models. The Agents era may spawn entirely new ways to capture value. The most likely outcome is a coexistence where "Fat Apps" continue to serve human users valuing UX, while a separate, Agent-driven economy emerges governed by different rules—where loyalty is based on factors like liquidity, latency, and settlement guarantees rather than brand.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на SOL (SOL) представлены ниже.

活动图片