指数下周有震荡调整,观察重要点位得失!

比推Опубликовано 2025-10-06Обновлено 2025-10-06

(本文附经典案例分析:微博_WB,唯品会_VIPS)

一、一周行情回顾:(09.29~10.03)

本周开盘价6661.58点,周二触及最低价6641.00点,周五创出最高价6750.87点,最终收盘价6715.79点,周振幅1.65%,涨幅1.09%,周线收出一根阳K线,收在5周均线之上,创出标普指数历史新高。

从4月7日到10月3日,指数已连续上涨了26周,共计125个交易日,累计最大涨幅为39.62%左右。

标普500指数周线图:(动能量化模型*情绪量化模型)

image.png

(图一)

标普500指数日线图:

image.png

(图二)

标普500指数周线图:(历史数据回测:2009年3月6日至2025年4月4日)

image.png

(图三)

笔者上周文章的题目是《标普指数多指标发出调整信号,警惕下跌风险!》,在文章中依据多周期技术指标共振以及十几年历史数据回测,对本周指数做出预测。

在指数走势方面:

上周四指数第六次回踩通道下轨获得支撑,本周需要观察支撑有效性;指数向上压力位在通道上轨,向下支撑位在通道下轨附近。

在操作策略方面:

1、在日线级别中,动能顶背离信号等多组指标叠加在一起形成共振,笔者提示下跌风险。

2、总仓位:多单持股仓位增加到70%左右,若指数跌破生命线通道,需将仓位降到30%以下。

2、对于短线投资者,可以从仓位中拿出20%左右筹码,依据支撑、压力位做“短差”。

现在回顾本周的实际走势:

周一指数开盘后小幅震荡,振幅很小,当天收出涨幅为0.26%的“十字星”K线;随后两天延续“低开高走”的走势,分别收出涨幅为0.41%、0.34%的两根小阳线;周四、周五两天指数波动不大,成交量较前几天有所萎缩,分别收出两根涨幅为0.06%、0.01%的小K线。最终本周收出一根涨幅为1.09%的阳线,并在周五创出指数历史新高6750.87点。本周实际走势与笔者预测大致相符。

接下来,笔者将根据多模型技术指标,分析当前指数发生的变化。

(一)、量化模型信号分析:

1、周线视角(见图一):

①、动能量化模型:本周没有信号显示,目前两条动能线缓慢上行。

模型提示下跌风险指数:中性

②、情绪量化模型:情绪1指标强度是5.03(取值范围0~10)左右,情绪2强度是5.05左右,顶峰信号指标是12.05。

模型提示震荡风险指数:高

③、数字监测模型:本周显示数字“9”,观察下周信号数字变化。

模型提示下跌风险指数:中性

2、日线视角(见图二):

①、动能量化模型:本周三收盘后,两条信号线由“死叉”变为“金叉”,量能柱由红变绿,动能顶背离信号消失,模型再次发出高位钝化信号。

模型提示目前指数多空双方争夺激烈,下跌风险指数:高

②、情绪量化模型:周五收盘后,1号情绪指标强度为3.56,2号情绪指标强度为0.21,顶峰信号指标是7.76。

模型提示下跌风险指数:高

③、数字监测模型:本周三盘后,收盘价大于上周四收盘价,预示上周四发出的日线顶部拐点信号消失。

模型提示下跌风险指数:中性

(二)、趋势时序与历史数据回测分析(图三):

1、笔者制定的数据回测模型:

①、回测数据区间:2009年3月6日2025年4月4日,共计840根周K线。

②、设定调整规则:回调≤2周且跌幅≥5%,或者回调≥3周,回测数据中符合条件的调整共有52次。

2、统计历史数据寻找规律:每当指数从低点连续上涨26周后,出现调整的概率为98.08%左右。

3、在笔者回测的模型中,最大的一次上涨周期出现在2017年7月19日至2018年1月26日,指数连续上涨29周后,出现了一次跌幅为13.43%的下跌走势;还有两次分别是上涨26周之后出现大幅度调整。

4、从4月7日到10月3日,指数已连续上涨了26周。

二、下周行情预测:(10.06~10.10)

1、指数在日线级别处于高位钝化状态;历史数据回测显示,目前指数回调概率约98.08%。笔者“谨慎看多”指数,下周初指数有调整。

2、目前指数仍然在(图二)所示的上升通道内运行,如果出现调整,重点观察通道下轨的得失。

3、指数向上压力位在通道上轨附近;向下第一支撑位在通道下轨附近,第二支撑位在6490~6550点附近。

三、下周操作策略:(10.06~10.10)

1、总仓位:多单持股仓位70%;如果指数跌破生命线通道,需将仓位降到30%以下。

2、对于短线投资者,可以从仓位中拿出20%左右筹码,依据支撑、压力位做“短差”。

3、短线操作时,建议把分析周期切换到60分钟或者120分钟的小周期,以便获取更精准的买卖点。

4、个股交易也可以参照上述操作策略。

特别提示:

对于个股波段操作,无论买入多单或者空单,建仓后立即设置初始止损位。当股价盈利5%时,立刻将止损位移动到成本线(即盈亏平衡点)附近,确保该笔交易不会亏损;当盈利达到10%时,将止损位上调至盈利5%的位置。此后,每当盈利增加5%时,止损位就同步上移相同幅度,以动态保护已实现利润(关于5%盈利设置的问题,投资者可以自行决定)。

四、经典案例分析:(只作为案例分析,不作为投资推荐)

1、微博(股票代码_WB):(多单)

微博(WB)日线图:


image.png

• 买入条件(多单):买入价是11.50~12.00美元,初始止损位是10.80美元,第一目标位是14.5~15美元,波段操作。

• 推荐理由:从周线形态来看,自2023年9月份以来,该股票持续在6.2~11.58美元之间做箱体震荡,持续时间大约两年左右,本月初股价放量突破箱体上沿,打开上升空间。

• 该股票本周开盘价12.63美元,最高价12.96美元,最低价12.36美元,收盘价12.61美元,周线收出涨幅为2.27%的“十字星”K线。笔者将止损位上调到12美元附近,持股待涨。

2、唯品会(股票代码_VIPS):(多单)

唯品会(VIPS)周线图:

image.png

• 买入条件(多单):买入价是19.30~19.50美元,初始止损位是18.00美元,第一目标位是24.00美元,波段操作。

• 推荐理由:从周线形态来看,唯品会本周放量突破“三角形”整理形态上轨,量价配合良好。下周若缩量回调19.30美元附近,可以考虑适量买入。

由于市场消息瞬息万变,笔者会适时调整操作策略及建议,投资者想及时获取最新信息,请关注下方链接。

以上各种模型是本人操作时遵守的交易规则,不构成任何买卖依据。个人观点,仅作参考。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush


说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Похожее

Warsh's First Day in Office, Markets Deliver a 'Wake-up Call': Rate Hike Expected This Year

On his first day in office, newly inaugurated Federal Reserve Chairman Warsh received a stark market warning, with expectations now fully pricing in a 25-basis-point interest rate hike this year. The shift was triggered by hawkish remarks from Fed Governor Waller, who stated that inflation is now the key policy "driver" and that the odds of a hike or cut are evenly split. This sent short-term Treasury yields higher. Waller signaled a significant pivot in his stance, citing disappointing inflation and labor data. He suggested removing "easing bias" language from Fed statements and did not rule out future rate increases if inflation fails to recede, though he noted immediate action isn't warranted without signs of unanchored inflation expectations. Chairman Warsh faces immediate pressure at his first FOMC meeting in June. With the preferred inflation gauge at a three-year high, analysts warn that failing to hike could be interpreted as an implicit easing of policy. The geopolitical situation in the Middle East is adding to existing price pressures. The market's expectation for a hike contrasts sharply with earlier forecasts for multiple cuts. While long-term Treasury yields have been contained by lower energy prices recently, analysts note they remain under structural upward pressure. Warsh's swearing-in at the White House highlights political scrutiny over Fed independence. However, the market has made it clear that inflation is the most urgent challenge, leaving the new chairman little time to settle in.

marsbit31 мин. назад

Warsh's First Day in Office, Markets Deliver a 'Wake-up Call': Rate Hike Expected This Year

marsbit31 мин. назад

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

Microsoft, once seen as an early AI frontrunner due to its investment in OpenAI, is navigating a strategic shift amid increased competition. Its initial reliance on OpenAI’s GPT models has been complicated by OpenAI’s growing ambitions as a direct competitor, rapid advancements from rivals like Claude and Gemini, and the disruptive rise of AI agents, which challenge its traditional SaaS business model. These factors contributed to stock declines and slower-than-expected adoption of its flagship Copilot products. In response, CEO Satya Nadella has taken a hands-on role in product development, signaling the urgency of change. Microsoft is pivoting from a model-centric strategy to a "model-agnostic" enterprise platform approach. It aims to become the foundational layer connecting various AI models—from OpenAI, Anthropic, or its own new "Superintelligence" team—with enterprise workflows, data, security, and cloud services. Recent organizational changes merged consumer and enterprise Copilot teams to accelerate innovation, exemplified by new products like Copilot Tasks and Copilot Cowork. However, this transformation comes at a high cost. Microsoft faces massive capital expenditures, potentially reaching ~$190 billion by 2026, to support AI infrastructure. While its platform strategy shows early signs of traction with growing Azure AI revenue, it must balance startup-like agility with the reliability expected by enterprise clients. The core challenge is no longer being the sole AI winner but defending its position as the essential enterprise software entry point amidst rapid technological commoditization and the shift towards always-on AI agents.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

Why FX Stablecoins Never Took Off: A Path Forward via Synthetic FX Despite the explosive growth of stablecoin-powered digital banking, which has seen ~$6B in VC investment and a 24x surge in crypto card spending in under a year, a major limitation persists: these banks are essentially dollar-only accounts. This leaves 95-99% of global accounts, which are denominated in non-USD currencies, underserved. Attempts to create native foreign currency (FX) stablecoins (like EURC) have largely failed, with total FX stablecoin TVL at ~$600M compared to $400B for USD stablecoins—a 700x gap. These FX tokens face critical challenges: fragile pegs due to low liquidity, limited exchange/FinTech acceptance, poor on/off-ramps, complex regional compliance, and a chicken-and-egg adoption problem. The article argues that the solution lies not in competing with entrenched USD stablecoin networks (USDT/USDC), but in adopting a synthetic FX model inspired by traditional finance. Specifically, it advocates for Mark-to-Market Non-Deliverable Forwards (NDFs)—cash-settled FX derivatives that allow users to maintain underlying USD stablecoin holdings while having their account balance and P&L denominated in a foreign currency. This approach offers key advantages: strong oracle-based pegs, retention of deep USD stablecoin liquidity and yield, superior on/off-ramps, scalability to any currency with a reliable feed, and capital efficiency. It mirrors how modern institutional FX markets operate. Primary use cases for on-chain NDFs include: 1. **Digital Banks/Wallets:** Enabling multi-currency accounts for international users without leaving the USD stablecoin ecosystem, boosting deposits and retention. 2. **FX Carry Trade Vaults:** Offering access to sovereign interest rate differentials (e.g., earning yield on BRL) in a more stable and scalable format than crypto-native products like Ethena. 3. **Global Enterprise Payments:** Allowing merchants to receive payments in local currency equivalents while settling in USD stablecoins, similar to services offered by Stripe for fiat. The conclusion is that synthetic FX, not native FX stablecoins, is the viable path to integrating foreign exchange into the growing stablecoin digital banking landscape, potentially unlocking the next phase of institutional DeFi and multi-trillion-dollar global adoption.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

链捕手1 ч. назад

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is "Bleeding Out" – How Can Practitioners Survive Better? In a candid reflection, the founder of IOSG Ventures voices deep concerns about the current state of Web3, describing an ecosystem experiencing severe "blood loss." Despite the recent MuShanghai event showcasing a successful pivot towards a more diverse, global community, a somber reality persists: many crypto-native attendees were there exploring exits or new labels in biotech, AI, and robotics. The core issue is identified as a breakdown in the ecosystem's positive feedback loop. Alarmingly, underestimated "low-probability bad events" are occurring simultaneously: a significant brain drain of Chinese developers to AI, a lack of breakout applications despite massive funding, and a widening credibility gap for practitioners globally, often stigmatized as scam artists. This has created a dire接班人 (successor) problem, with the next generation seeing little professional prestige or financial upside in crypto compared to fields like AI. A significant portion of the critique focuses on Ethereum and Vitalik Buterin. While not pessimistic about Ethereum's technology, the founder worries that critical development windows were missed by focusing on niche technical narratives like ZK and L2 instead of mass-market applications. A more urgent concern is that Vitalik may be isolated in an "information bubble," shielded from the grassroots community's hardships by layers of intermediaries, preventing crucial feedback from reaching him. The call is for Vitalik to return to a founder's mindset, re-engage directly with the community, and rally efforts for the next decade. The divergence between U.S. and Chinese OG (Original Gangster) ecosystems is stark. While many U.S. builders reinvest their wealth into the ecosystem, the Chinese scene suffers from a severe lack of "造血能力" (blood-making ability), with most market-driven funds struggling and many early success stories cashing out entirely. This threatens the entire Asian Web3 ecosystem's survival. For individual practitioners, survival advice is pragmatic: find your core "why," maintain life balance beyond token prices, continuously learn new skills (like AI), form small, trusted alliances for mutual support, and practice self-compassion. The industry's greatest need is not money or tech, but lighthouses—individuals at all levels who offer mentorship, grants, referrals, and honest reflection to guide others. The piece concludes with a direct appeal: OGs must pay forward the opportunities the industry gave them; founders must not struggle alone; and builders must continue their work, ensuring it remains a viable profession. The survival of Web3's "cathedral" depends not on any single leader but on the collective responsibility of everyone who remains.

marsbit2 ч. назад

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片