7张图揭示DeFi现状:Fluid领跑DEX大战,USDe改写稳定币格局

marsbitОпубликовано 2025-08-07Обновлено 2025-08-08

2025年至今对DeFi来说是非常友好的一年。

我们的监管环境已从Gary Gensler领导SEC采取敌对立场,转变为如今对加密友好的局面。而从几乎所有指标来看,DeFi的采用率都在不断增加。

所以我想现在是时候仔细研究DeFi现状相关的7张图表了。

去中心化交易所到中心化交易所交易额正屡创新高

DeFi

来源: The Block

尽管进程缓慢但趋势明显,去中心化交易所正不断蚕食中心化交易所的市场份额。

2022年6月,永续DEX在衍生品领域的市场份额仅为0.98%。三年后,这个数据已增长了11倍。


Fluid是增长最快的DEX

DeFi

来源:DeFiLlama

据报道,Fluid上线不到一年时间,日交易量便一度超越以太坊上的龙头DEX Uniswap。

Fluid DEX V2即将上线,如果Fluid最终在以太坊上赢得DEX之战,我一点也不会感到意外。

在资本效率方面,V2预计将远高于V1版本。


生息型稳定币首次登顶资金流入榜

DeFi

来源: Artemis

近日,Ethena旗下的稳定币USDe首次在两周净流入量上超越了USDT和USDC两大主流稳定币。

为什么这个变化如此重要?

USDT和USDC在稳定币领域长期领跑市场,而如今加密原生解决方案正不断涌现,挑战其主导地位。

我的预测是Resolv、Ethena和Falcon Finance在未来几个月将继续呈指数级增长。


现货以太坊ETF表现良好,但涨势正在放缓

DeFi

来源:Coinglass

经过数周持续刷新单日流入资金历史新高后,以太坊现货ETF近日录得有记录以来最大单日资金流出。

原因可能是,一些传统金融巨头已经获利了结。

不过,如果我们从宏观来看,过去两个月是现货以太坊ETF迄今为止表现最好的阶段。


DeFi正在逼近AI的心智份额

DeFi

来源:Kaito

一年多以来,AI一直在心智占有率上占据领先地位。

但这种局面正在改变,在过去的几个月里,DeFi的关注度增长了两倍多。与此同时,Meme币的关注度大幅减少。

基本面再次变得重要起来。


2025年具有代币回购计划的项目表现最为出色

DeFi

来源:Dexu AI

这标志着市场开始青睐基本面扎实的代币。进行代币回购的协议子类别包括 Hyperliquid、PumpFun、Maple、EtherFi、Kaito、AAVE等项目。


交易所BTC储备量持续下降

DeFi

来源:Crypto Quant

2024年2月以来(正值美国首批比特币现货ETF推出后不久),交易所BTC储备量就持续减少,而这种情况与之前的牛市恰恰相反​​。

本周期内,比特币ETF的资金流入以及加密资产储备公司产生的购买需求,对BTC价格产生了巨大的积极影响。

综上所述,以上就是本期要呈现的全部数据图表。

Похожее

Interview with 7 Ordinary Professionals: After AI Arrived, How Are You Doing?

This article interviews seven professionals from diverse fields like Web3, bulk chemical trading, digital agriculture, and traditional wholesale to examine the impact of AI on their work. Key themes emerge from the discussions. AI has become integral to their workflows, primarily for increasing efficiency in tasks such as coding, content creation, research, and data analysis. Individuals across roles, from developers to managers, report that AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude have significantly reduced workloads and accelerated learning, creating opportunities for "super individuals" or one-person teams. However, this efficiency comes with a double-edged sword. It intensifies competition, pushing professionals to constantly learn new tools and adapt, leading to widespread anxiety about job security and a heightened pressure to keep pace. Interviewees anticipate significant job reductions in roles like administrative support, finance, HR, customer service, and some creative fields. A recurring view is that AI acts as a "great equalizer," amplifying the capabilities of those who use it effectively while leaving others behind, potentially deepening polarization. Despite AI's capabilities, interviewees identify enduring human strengths. AI struggles with tasks requiring deep contextual understanding, complex judgment in areas like risk assessment and system stability (especially in finance/Web3), nuanced human communication, and handling exceptions in logistics and manufacturing. These areas remain firmly in the human domain. Consequently, many professionals are refocusing their career strategies. They plan to evolve from task executors into "complex system owners," "super coordinators" managing AI agents, or specialists in high-level areas like business context, risk control, product design, and personal branding. In summary, the article portrays AI not as an optional tool but as a transformative force reshaping job demands. While it automates routine work, it also creates new forms of pressure and competition. The future, as seen by these professionals, belongs to those who can strategically integrate AI to augment uniquely human skills like judgment, responsibility, and strategic oversight.

marsbit14 мин. назад

Interview with 7 Ordinary Professionals: After AI Arrived, How Are You Doing?

marsbit14 мин. назад

Satoshi Nakamoto Sued? $83.7 Billion Worth of BTC Up for 'Legal Claim'

An anonymous individual known as Noah Doe, along with two Wyoming LLCs, has filed a lawsuit in the New York Supreme Court. They are attempting to use New York's "lost and found" laws to claim legal ownership of approximately 837 billion USD worth of Bitcoin held in 39,069 dormant addresses. Crucially, this list includes addresses believed to belong to Bitcoin's creator, Satoshi Nakamoto (holding around 837 billion USD), alongside other long-inactive addresses from Mt. Gox and early Bitcoin holders. The plaintiff's legal strategy hinges on classifying these public Bitcoin addresses as "lost property." They submitted a USB drive containing only the public addresses to the New York Police Department, sent OP_RETURN notifications on the Bitcoin blockchain, and issued press releases. Their argument is that after these efforts and a waiting period, they should be granted ownership. A key, and highly controversial, claim is an unnamed "independent expert" valuing each address at under 10 USD, allowing for a faster legal process. Analysts from Galaxy point out major flaws in the case. The plaintiff never physically possessed the Bitcoin or private keys. The "under 10 USD" valuation is considered unrealistic, and allowing anonymous companies to claim such vast assets is highly unusual. Even if the plaintiff wins, they would only receive a court declaration of ownership, not the actual private keys to move the Bitcoin. The real danger lies in this court document acting as a "cloud on title." If any of these Bitcoins are later transferred to a regulated exchange or custodian, the plaintiff could present the judgment to freeze the assets, forcing the true owner into lengthy and de-anonymizing litigation to prove ownership. The outcome is uncertain, but the case highlights potential legal risks for dormant cryptocurrency holdings.

marsbit18 мин. назад

Satoshi Nakamoto Sued? $83.7 Billion Worth of BTC Up for 'Legal Claim'

marsbit18 мин. назад

Is Satoshi in Legal Trouble? $83.7 Billion Worth of BTC Might Be 'Legally Claimed'

An anonymous plaintiff, “Noah Doe,” and two shell companies have filed a lawsuit in New York Supreme Court, seeking a declaratory judgment granting them ownership of 39,069 dormant Bitcoin addresses containing approximately 3.8 million BTC (worth ~$293.5 billion). Their claim is based on New York’s lost property law, arguing these addresses are abandoned assets. The plaintiff “found” the addresses, stored them on a USB drive, and delivered it to a police station, followed by chain notifications (OP_RETURN) and a press release. Notably, the list includes addresses linked to Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto (holding ~1.1 million BTC), a Mt. Gox hacker address, a provably unspendable burn address, and other long-inactive wallets. The plaintiff’s “independent expert” controversially values each address at under $10 to invoke a fast-track legal process. Critical issues question the lawsuit's validity: the lost property law is designed for physical items, not publicly viewable blockchain addresses; the valuation is implausible; and the plaintiff’s anonymity is contested. Even if successful, the plaintiff would only receive a paper judgment, not the private keys. However, such a ruling could create a “title defect,” allowing them to challenge future transactions of these coins on regulated platforms, potentially freezing assets and forcing anonymous holders to reveal themselves in legal disputes. The court is unlikely to grant a broad default judgment given the novel and high-stakes nature of the claim.

Odaily星球日报21 мин. назад

Is Satoshi in Legal Trouble? $83.7 Billion Worth of BTC Might Be 'Legally Claimed'

Odaily星球日报21 мин. назад

Deconstructing the U.S. Stock Quantum Computing Sector: IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, Which of These Concept Stocks is Worth Betting On?

**Title:** Analyzing the US Quantum Computing Race: IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave – Which Concept Stock is Worth Betting On? **Summary:** The podcast discusses the resurgence of quantum computing as a national priority for both the US and China, driven by its potential to break current encryption, revolutionize drug discovery, finance, and logistics. The core challenge is commercializing the technology, which is hampered by high error rates in quantum bits (qubits). Quantum error correction, requiring thousands of physical qubits per reliable logical qubit, is key but years away. The analysis compares three main publicly traded US quantum computing firms: * **IonQ (Ion Trap):** Considered the most financially stable with the fastest commercial progress (2025 revenue: $130M, +202%) and high-quality clients. Its valuation is very high, pricing in significant future growth. * **Rigetti (Superconducting):** Seen as the highest-risk, highest-potential-reward bet. It has the smallest revenue but recently launched a 108-qubit system. Its valuation multiples are extreme, making it highly sensitive to news. * **D-Wave (Quantum Annealing):** Has the most unique positioning with real-world enterprise clients today (e.g., Mastercard, Volkswagen) solving optimization problems. Its recent acquisition moves it into general-purpose quantum computing ("dual-platform"), adding execution risk. Major tech giants like Google, IBM, and Microsoft are also heavily invested, pursuing various technical approaches. Nvidia is positioning itself as the essential bridge between classical and quantum computing. The investment phase is likened to AI in 2018-2020: promising underlying technology with accelerating breakthroughs but a commercial inflection point still 3-7 years away, suggesting potential for a market correction ("bubble washout"). For investors, suggested approaches include gaining exposure through tech giants with quantum divisions (e.g., Google, IBM) or using niche ETFs like WQTM for pure-play quantum exposure, rather than direct stock picks in the highly volatile pure-play companies at this early stage.

marsbit48 мин. назад

Deconstructing the U.S. Stock Quantum Computing Sector: IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, Which of These Concept Stocks is Worth Betting On?

marsbit48 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片