火星早报 | 鲍威尔表态倾向鹰派立场,白宫加密货币报告正式发布

marsbitОпубликовано 2025-07-30Обновлено 2025-07-31

白宫白宫加密货币报告正式发布

7 月 31 日,白宫加密货币报告正式发布。从连接东西海岸的铁路,到连接全世界的互联网,自建国以来,每一代美国企业家都引领了下一代技术的建设。「加密 3.0」(Crypto3)也不应例外。作为本报告的撰写者,工作小组(Working Group)支持这样的理念:数字资产和区块链技术不仅能够彻底革新美国的金融体系,还可以革新整个经济体系中的所有权结构和治理体系。利用这些技术开创新兴行业的美国企业家,应当获得清晰的政策指引以及对其成就的充分肯定。核心政策建议如下:

· 美国公民与企业应有权合法持有数字资产并使用区块链技术,不应担心被追责;

· 为建设全球最深、最具流动性的美国数字资产市场打下基础:美国证券交易委员会(SEC)与商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)应立即动用现有权限,在联邦层面开放数字资产交易。

· 银行业监管者不应重蹈拜登时期「钳制行动 2.0」的覆辙,而应拥抱区块链与数字资产带来的机遇;

· 支持美元稳定币成为数字时代支付创新的核心,助力美元在全球维持主导地位;

· 美国执法机构应有能力打击使用数字资产从事非法活动的人,但不得滥用工具打压守法公民等等。

美联储利率决议有两名理事投反对票,为近30多年来首次

7 月 31 日,美联储周三维持利率不变,决议过程出现罕见分歧,声明未明确何时可能降息。此次决议遭到两位由特朗普任命的理事——沃勒和鲍曼的反对,两人均认为当前的货币政策过于紧缩。这是 30 多年来首次有两名理事在决议中投出反对票。FOMC 以 9 比 2 投票决定将基准隔夜利率维持在 4.25%-4.50% 区间,连续第五次会议按兵不动。

美联储在声明中表示:「失业率仍处于低位,就业市场状况依然稳健。通胀仍然略高。」声明同时指出,经济增长在上半年「有所放缓」,这可能强化了若该趋势持续,美联储在未来某次会议上降息的理由。不过声明也强调,「对经济前景的不确定性仍然较高」,并称通胀与就业目标都面临风险。这种措辞反映出美联储在通胀与就业路径尚不明朗前仍不愿贸然降息。

分析师:鲍威尔表态倾向鹰派立场

7 月 31 日,分析师 Chris Anstey 称,鲍威尔表示,「仍有许多、许多不确定性需要解决。是的,我们确实在不断获得更多信息。但目前来看,我们距离这一过程的终点还不算太近。展望未来,感觉还有很多事情将会发生。」这番话倾向于鹰派立场。美联储主席鲍威尔还表示,无法在六周后依据 6 月份的预测(点阵图)来做决策。其个人的判断是(当前政策)处于适度限制性区间,不过(各方)对此存在一系列不同的预估。

Cboe BZX与Arca向美SEC提出新上市标准,以简化加密货币ETF审批流程

7 月 31 日,据 The Block 报道,Cboe BZX Exchange 和 Arca 公司提出了加密货币 ETF 的上市标准,旨在加快其公开交易的审批流程。 在周三提交给美国证券交易委员会(SEC)的文件中,Cboe BZX 请求 SEC 修改一项规则,以「允许符合拟议规则 14.11(e)(4) 要求的商品型信托股份进行通用上市和交易」。该规则监管商品型信托股份的交易和上市,并对某些股份在交易平台上市设有具体要求。

分析师:美SEC公布加密ETF上市新标准,Coinbase期货挂钩币种有望率先获批

7 月 31 日,彭博 ETF 高级分析师 Eric Balchunas 在社交媒体发文表示,美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 的加密货币 ETP「上市标准」已通过新的交易平台备案文件发布。 核心结论是:任何在 Coinbase 衍生品交易平台上市、且期货交易持续超过 6 个月的代币,都有望获得批准。目前大约有十几种主流币种符合标准,和之前预测概率在 85% 以上的那些一样。唯一悬而未决的问题是时间点,这批 ETF 可能于今年 9 月至 10 月间集中获批。 对于尚未推出期货的山寨币或 Meme 币(如 BONK、TRUMP 等),若要 ETF 化则需依赖《1940 年投资公司法》路径,采用不同产品结构。而从历史经验来看,监管层更倾向采用基于《1933 年证券法》的「纯现货」ETF 模式。 注:SEC 所公布的是关于加密货币 ETP 的上市标准,但具体到这批即将推出的加密货币产品,大多会采用 ETF 结构。

Bitwise高管:财库公司解决以太坊叙事困境

7 月 31 日,据 Cointelegraph 报道,Bitwise 首席投资官 Matt Hougan 表示,以太坊财库公司和持仓公司通过以传统投资者更易理解的方式包装这种数字资产,解决了以太坊的「叙事困境」,从而吸引了更多资本,加速了其采用。 Hougan 在接受采访时指出,以太坊一直难以为传统金融投资者明确其收益模型,直到其原生代币 Ether(ETH)被包装进类似「股票壳」的结构中。 他解释说:「过去几年,从估值角度来看,ETH 一直面临一个问题,那就是华尔街找不到它为何有价值的明确答案。它是价值储藏手段吗?是销毁机制带来的稀缺性?是收入来源吗?还是质押的收益?没人说得清。但如果拿出 10 亿美元的 ETH 放进一家公司,并将其用于质押,那么就会立刻开始产出收益。而投资者对能够产生收益的公司是非常熟悉的。」

加密ETF的“诺曼底时刻”:SEC新规默许质押收益,Coinbase成最大赢家

2024年比特币现货ETF获批后,美国监管机构正推动山寨币ETF的“通用上市标准”,将审批权部分下放至合规期货交易所。Coinbase凭借其衍生品平台和质押服务成为最大受益者,可能主导Avalanche、Solana等主流山寨币的ETF化进程。新规将加速加密资产融入传统金融,而Coinbase的生态系统优势使其成为连接两大领域的关键枢纽。

评论:为何艺术展正在消失,加密货币成了富人的洗钱工具?

艺术品市场正面临加密货币的冲击,传统作为富人节税、洗钱工具的艺术品交易逐渐被更高效的加密资产取代。台北当代艺术博览会停办反映了中端艺术市场的萎缩,热钱正流向流动性更强、交易成本更低的加密货币。富人以往通过艺术信托、自由港或1031 Exchange节税,如今加密市场提供了更匿名、便捷的替代方案。尽管顶级艺术品市场依然稳固,但中端市场被掏空,艺术展生存困境凸显。未来,艺术品的区块链代币化(RWA)或成新出路,解决真伪与流动性问题,但传统艺术生态已难回昔日繁荣。

空投倒计时!Linea掀桌L2赛道:双通缩引擎输血以太坊,9%代币解锁开启“正统性投票”

沉寂两年的ConsenSys旗下zkEVM项目Linea突然宣布重大进展:公布完整代币经济模型,确认9%代币空投在即,并创新性提出"以太坊优先"机制——所有Gas费用用ETH支付并部分销毁,剩余80%用于回购销毁LINEA代币,形成"双通缩"模型。该项目试图重构L2与L1的价值关系,将自身定位为以太坊的"价值放大器",但当前TVL仅5亿美元,生态成熟度仍面临挑战。

Похожее

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News4 мин. назад

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News4 мин. назад

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News22 мин. назад

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News22 мин. назад

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit33 мин. назад

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit33 мин. назад

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片