Dogecoin Price Crash To $0.2: Analyst Warns Of Further Crash To $0.15

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2025-02-26Обновлено 2025-02-26

Введение

The cryptocurrency market has been reeling from a broader sell-off, and Dogecoin has not been spared, with its price recently...

The cryptocurrency market has been reeling from a broader sell-off, and Dogecoin has not been spared, with its price recently dropping to a three-month low of $0.20. While there has been a slight recovery, concerns remain that the decline is not over yet. According to a crypto analyst known as David_Perk on TradingView, Dogecoin is still in a strong downtrend, with indicators pointing toward further losses that could see the meme coin crashing to $0.15.

Dogecoin’s Price Weakness And The Risks Of Further Decline

Dogecoin’s recent price crash was a very daunting move for bullish investors. However, the crash led to a rebound at the $0.2 level, and now seems to be stabilizing at this support level. While this is a temporary slowdown in the crash, technical analysis shows there’s still a risk of more downside moves. 

Crypto analyst David_Perk, who shared his outlook on TradingView using the 12-hour Dogecoin candlestick chart, maintains that the meme coin remains in a firm downtrend. According to the analysis, there are no clear signs of a bullish reversal at this stage, with price action continuing to reflect selling pressure.

David_Perk’s analysis suggests that DOGE is currently positioned within a strong descending channel and is approaching a critical daily trendline. Notably, this descending channel has been in formation since the beginning of this year. 

Dogecoin
A impending descent to $0.15 | Source: David Perk on Tradingview

The loss of multiple support levels further strengthens the argument that Dogecoin could be headed for another leg downward. Fibonacci retracement levels and historical price data reinforce this bearish outlook, with the analyst predicting a minimum 30% drop from the current levels.

Is A Further Crash To $0.15 Really Coming?

According to the analyst, Dogecoin could continue declining until it bottoms out at $0.15, based on historical data and Fibonnacci levels. Notably, the recent dip has erased a large portion of the gains Dogecoin holders had accumulated since October 2024, and if the decline extends to $0.15, it would mark a near-total retracement of the rally that began late last year. Particularly, such a move would mark a 68% loss from Dogecoin’s recent multi-year high in December last year.

At the time of writing, Dogecoin is trading at $0.21, up by about 4.5% in the past 24 hours, but still down 16.5% in a seven-day timeframe. The only way to avoid such a dip to $0.15 is if DOGE bulls can maintain a foothold above the support at $0.20 and break above $0.25. Failure to break above $0.25 would keep Dogecoin trapped in its descending channel. The next thing in this case would be the creation of a lower low, which would ultimately translate to a crash below $0.20. 

Fortunately, on-chain data shows that long-term DOGE holding addresses are still in “Denail,” which is still a positive signal.

Dogecoin
DOGE trading at $0.21 on the 1D chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Medium, chart from Tradingview.com
Scott Matherson

Scott Matherson

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Похожее

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手2 ч. назад

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手2 ч. назад

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手2 ч. назад

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手2 ч. назад

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片