Bybit CEO Slams Pi Network, Says Exchange Won’t List ‘Scam’ Token

mediumОпубликовано 2025-02-22Обновлено 2025-02-22

Введение

Bybit CEO Ben Zhou criticized the Pi Network, calling it a scam.

By Prashant Jha

Key Takeaways

Bybit CEO Ben Zhou criticized the Pi Network, calling it a scam.

Zhou cited a 2023 Chinese police warning alleging the project targets the elderly.

Pi Network debuted with a $180 billion fully diluted valuation (FDV) but lost over 65% of its value within 24 hours.

While global crypto exchanges rush to capitalize on the Pi Network hype, listing its long-awaited token, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou is taking a stand.

Unlike OKX and other major platforms that embraced Pi’s debut, Zhou has openly criticized the project, labeling it a scam and refusing to list the token.

Bybit CEO Takes a Stand Against Pi Network as Exchanges Rush to List It

Zhou’s skepticism is not new.

Pi Network, a so-called decentralized mining project, has been embroiled in controversy for years, drawing criticism for its opaque operations, delayed mainnet launch, and a recruitment model that some liken to a pyramid scheme.

However, the token’s recent listing on centralized exchanges reignited debate about its legitimacy, as it saw an explosive valuation followed by a rapid collapse in price.

On Feb. 20, Zhou doubled down on his position, citing an official warning from Chinese authorities.

The authorities flagged Pi Network as a potential scam that exploits users, particularly the elderly. His comments fueled a fresh wave of scrutiny just as the project’s long-awaited token faced its first major test in the open market.

“If the project is legitimate, then you should come forth and address these reports so everyone can understand. Instead, you choose to make up nonsense and resort to childish attacks. Yes, I still think you are a scam, and no, Bybit will not list a scam,” he wrote.

Pi Network’s Price Collapses Post-Launch

Beyond questions of legitimacy, Pi Network’s token launch has also raised concerns about valuation and accessibility.

Ahead of its listing, Pi tokens were trading at over $70 in unofficial markets, fueling optimism among early adopters.

However, when the token debuted on centralized exchanges at a $180 billion FDV and a price of $1.97, many investors were unable to sell.

Complaints flooded social media as users reported being locked out due to unresolved KYC issues—some had been waiting for verification for years.

As soon as trading opened, the market reaction was swift. The price plunged within hours as traders rushed to sell, eager to take profits after years of speculation. Within 24 hours, Pi had dropped to $0.66, erasing $120 billion in market value and fueling further doubts about its long-term viability.

Похожее

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手1 ч. назад

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手1 ч. назад

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手1 ч. назад

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片