Solana 推出新的 Seeker 设备,称这不仅仅是一个 “memecoin 手机”

tokeninsight_newsОпубликовано 2024-09-19Обновлено 2024-09-19

据 Cointelegraph 报道,Solana 最新推出的 Seeker 设备将成为类似 Saga 的“奖励磁铁”,但 Solana Labs 总经理 Emmett Hollyer 表示,这不仅仅是一款“狗狗币手机”。

Solana 刚刚揭示了其最新、最闪亮的智能手机“Seeker”——其价格仅为前身 Saga 的一半,并且据团队称,它不会仅依赖于免费的狗狗币。

Saga 于去年 5 月推出,起初受到技术评论家和加密用户的差评,然而,在 12 月,名为 Bonk(BONK)的狗狗币价格突然上涨了 1000%,使设备在 12 月 16 日售罄,这堪称 Saga 的“救星”。

Solana 显然没有忘记这一点。

在其新版本中,Solana 希望为已有 14 万名预购 Seeker 的用户提供类似的奖励,这些用户已经支付了 450 到 500 美元不等的金额。

在新加坡 Token2049 大会上,Hollyer 向《币电报》表示,Seeker 将成为用户的“奖励磁铁”,但强调它不仅仅是“狗狗币手机”。

“Seeker 和 Saga 一样,将是一个奖励磁铁,同时也是团队构建全新体验的巨大机会,”Hollyer 说,并指出新设备将配备升级版的去中心化应用(DApp)商店和更好的硬件。

“这不是狗狗币手机。它将支持网络上的所有优秀用例,无论是狗狗币、去中心化金融(DeFi)、支付还是游戏。”

Hollyer 表示,他希望一个开放且不受限制的 DApp 商店能够让开发者迅速推出和部署新应用,以更好地捕捉新兴的叙事和用例。

新硬件,够吗?
Solana 还希望通过更好的硬件吸引买家。

Solana 的 Saga 去年因其技术能力与 iPhone 或 Google Pixel 等设备相比而受到批评。

Hollyer 表示,这款手机将拥有更高质量的屏幕、更好的摄像头和升级的电池,使其“比前身更轻、更亮、更好”,但没有进一步详细说明。

然而,Hollyer 解释说,Solana 并不打算直接与 Apple 和三星等移动设备巨头竞争,而是专注于创造一种尽可能为用户提供加密实用性的手持设备。

“我们有不同的目标和用户群。但幸运的是,随着年份的推移,许多高端手机硬件变得越来越可获得,”Hollyer 说。

尽管如此,那些期待狗狗币丰厚回报的人可能还需耐心等待。

根据 Solana 移动空投检查工具 TwoLoot 的数据,在发布时,Seeker 设备用户收到的空投代币的当前价值仅为 265 美元,远低于 Saga 上锁定的 1350 美元的空投。

Hollyer 认为,尽管奖励是新设备销售宣传的重要部分,Seeker 还将为用户提供广泛的新加密集成体验。

“奖励是故事的一部分,但我认为很多用户开始看到事情发展的方向。”

Похожее

To Those Ordinary People Who Haven't Invested in AI: You Think You're Late, You're Just Lacking Your Own Worldview

**Summary:** The article argues that ordinary investors feeling FOMO over missing the AI investment boom lack not timing, but their own independent worldview. Most people chase "what to buy" based on others' opinions (FOMO, envy) rather than fundamental analysis. This leads to costly mistakes: not knowing when to exit winning trades or cut losses on losing ones. The core solution is to develop a personal, long-term (5-10 year) worldview about societal shifts and technological bottlenecks. For most, building this from scratch (Path A) is too demanding. A practical alternative (Path B) is to follow the **capital expenditures (capex)** and strategic investments of visionary leaders, as their money reveals true conviction more reliably than their words. Five key figures to track for different AI perspectives are highlighted: Jensen Huang (NVIDIA, infrastructure), Elon Musk (Tesla/SpaceX/xAI, capex signals), Sam Altman (OpenAI, commercialization, but beware hype), Dario Amodei (Anthropic, technical/safety focus), and Liang Wenfeng (DeepSeek, efficiency/anti-consensus view). The article details how to read capex signals from hyperscalers' financial reports, NVIDIA's revenue breakdown, and strategic investments. It maps the complete AI产业链 (supply chain) from raw materials/energy to models/applications, explaining value flow and inter-dependencies (e.g., how a model release triggers demand across chips, memory, and optics). Finally, it provides an action plan: secure personal finances first, allocate a limited portfolio percentage (max 25%) to the theme, prefer broad ETFs (like QQQ), use dollar-cost averaging over 6-12 months, and write down strict investment rules beforehand to combat emotional errors during market volatility. The conclusion is that a stable, personally-held worldview enables disciplined, long-term investment far more than chasing short-term trends.

marsbit14 мин. назад

To Those Ordinary People Who Haven't Invested in AI: You Think You're Late, You're Just Lacking Your Own Worldview

marsbit14 мин. назад

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

Microsoft has halted the widespread internal use of Claude Code, withdrawing licenses from most employees by the end of its fiscal year, June 30, 2026. This reversal comes just six months after actively promoting the AI coding tool to boost productivity via "vibe coding"—where developers describe intent in natural language and let the LLM generate code. The core issue isn't the tool's effectiveness; internal reports suggest employees preferred Claude Code over Microsoft's own Copilot CLI. The problem is financial: the "copilot mode" adds a variable, consumption-based token cost on top of existing employee salaries without a proportional revenue increase. As usage grew, the token bills became unsustainable, leading to what sources describe as a cost-structure failure. Similar overruns have been reported at other firms like Uber. The article contrasts this with the approach of AI-native startups, exemplified by Y Combinator's philosophy. Here, high token consumption is strategic—it replaces, rather than supplements, human labor. Startups operate with tiny teams where AI agents handle work previously done by many, making the high token bill financially viable as it offsets much larger personnel costs. The conclusion is that "vibe coding" isn't dead, but its economics fail within traditional corporate structures that treat AI as a productivity add-on for existing staff. Success requires a foundational shift to an AI-native organization, where processes are built to be "legible to AI," and the company's core knowledge and assets reside in documented, AI-accessible systems rather than solely in employees' minds. The future divide will be between companies that merely add AI tools and those that redesign their organizations around them.

marsbit34 мин. назад

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

marsbit34 мин. назад

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

In the past month, the market has been actively trading contrasting expectations, balancing global supply chain disruptions fueling re-inflation against both actual and anticipated (Walsh) interest rate hikes. This volatility has impacted commodities and most equities, though tech has temporarily benefited from concentrated short-term liquidity. Fundamentally, as previously analyzed regarding the Strait of Hormuz situation, the US faces deep-seated balance sheet issues beyond what any single Fed chair can resolve. Hypotheses around a figure like Walsh could only materialize if AI fundamentally reshapes production relations. Until then, most non-AI-leading nations (effectively all except the US and China) risk fiscal and monetary policy collapse, rendering the identity of the Fed chair ultimately irrelevant. For crypto assets, there is currently no clear role in these dominant narratives. The market remains strongly capped by the 200-day moving average. While trends may shift from "anything but AI" to "anything but mines," this phase is dominated by the silicon vs. carbon (AI vs. traditional) dichotomy, leaving little room for crypto—though its time will come. **Market Overview & Commentary** The crypto market lacks significant catalysts beyond hype, plagued by low volume and scarce innovation, with clear technical resistance. Currently, crypto struggles for attention as global focus lies elsewhere. Assets like gold, oil, and grains are more direct hedges against supply-chain-driven inflation/stagflation. Bitcoin needs more time for capitulation and consolidation; this reset is expected to last until at least Q4 2026. Looking ahead, three factors will likely drive future market volatility: 1. Whether Walsh repeats the patterns of predecessors like Bassant or Musk, shifting stance into a new policy cycle. 2. The market underestimates the severity of global supply chain damage and the prolonged time needed for repair, which will eventually lead to recognition of acute resource shortages and price swings. 3. AI non-beneficiary, high-inflation nations (e.g., UK, Japan) will face severe fiscal and monetary crises. Rapid AI-driven displacement could trigger a collapse of existing credit and welfare systems. Ultimately, the market may realize that an AI bubble burst could spark contagious sovereign credit crises. The monetary and fiscal responses to such a scenario could serve as the ultimate catalyst for Bitcoin's next major bull run.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

marsbit1 ч. назад

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

The largest IPO in history is imminent as SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, is set to price its offering on June 12. At a targeted valuation near $2 trillion, this event will mint new billionaires from Musk's inner circle of long-time allies, rewarding their loyalty with unprecedented returns. Key beneficiaries include Antonio Gracias, Musk's close friend and confidant, who holds a 7.3% stake potentially worth over $140 billion, making him the second-largest individual shareholder. Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO since 2002, holds shares valued at roughly $2 billion. Bret Johnsen, the CFO, holds stock worth approximately $1.4 billion. Luke Nosek, a PayPal co-founder and early investor, stands to gain about $5.3 billion. The IPO filing also reveals complex and controversial financial arrangements. SpaceX has guaranteed nearly $20 billion in payments from xAI's subsidiary to Gracias's Valor Equity Partners for AI hardware leases—deals auditors flagged as "failed sale-leaseback" transactions, forcing SpaceX to record them as debt. Despite rapid revenue growth, SpaceX is not profitable, posting a $49 billion loss in 2025 and a $4.3 billion loss in Q1 2026. Capital expenditures are soaring, with over 60% directed toward AI. Public investors will inherit these losses, significant debts, and a governance structure heavily controlled by insiders, including a provision granting Musk up to a billion additional shares if one million people live on Mars.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

链捕手1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на SOL (SOL) представлены ниже.

活动图片