Story Protocol BU FAN:IPFi将如何迭代知识产权市场|FAT Awards 2024

Odaily星球日报Опубликовано 2024-09-17Обновлено 2024-09-17

Введение

创造开放型价值转移系统。

9 月 16 日,「FAT Awards 2024 」年度盛典于在新加坡康莱德酒店盛大开幕。 「FAT」是 Odaily 星球日报于 2020 年创办的榜单盛典+高峰论坛品牌,旨在嘉奖 Web3 和加密行业的领航者与创新者、聚焦价值范式与共识时刻。2024 ,值加密行业日新月异、叙事为主流世界认可之际,新鲜叙事涌动、生态百花齐放、优质项目接连上线,Odaily 星球日报再次开启 FAT 榜单评选,并举办线下盛典。

活动上,Story Protocol Head of IPFi BU FAN 围绕着 IPFi 为主题发表了演讲。Bu Fan 将 IPFi 定义为:于 IP 领域支持金融市场活动(存储和转移资产价值),建设开放无需可的金融生态。

落到实践层面,Bu Fan 认为 IPFi 有三个阶段:第一阶段仍保留 DeFi 的核心目标与功能;第二阶段开始通过新的代币形态进行实验,以新的代币及方法论赋能 IP;第三阶段或发展向结构化 IPFi,面向创造者的具象化 IPFi 服务,代币形式更为衍生,或发展向实验性 IPFi,提供纯粹新机制的 IP 服务,专注于服务 IP 长期生态需求。

Story Protocol BU FAN:IPFi将如何迭代知识产权市场|FAT Awards 2024

以下为 BU FAN 现场演讲全文,经 Odaily星球日报编辑整理,enjoy~ 

大家下午好,我是来自 Story Protocol 的 BU FAN,今天希望在这里分享 IPFi 及其与 Story Protocol 的关系。

Story Protocol 是一个即将上线的 Layer 1 ,我们目前处于测试网阶段。Story Protocol 专注于知识产权(IP),我们的目标是让可编程的 IP 变为现实。在 Web2 时代,IP 往往归大公司所有,IP 的开发权则受到合同的限制,我们希望带来的改变是,利用区块链让每一个人都可以负担、使用 IP。

假设你在 Story Protocol 上构建了一个故事,并想将其制作成电影,你将能够在 Story Protocol 上注册该资产,并定义版税条款,如果这个故事取得了巨大的商业成功,你将可以获取 5% 的收益 —— 具体数字由 IP 所有者设定。我们对 Story Protocol 的期望是,未来该链上将注册大量的 IP,且它们都会拥有开放式的佣金关系。这就是所谓的 IPFi,当 Story Protocol 上线之上,金融交易便会发生。

我想从金融通常所扮演的角色开始讨论。金融是各行各业发展的推动者,金融所扮演的角色是为公司提供资本,以创造消费者想要的商品。Crypto 是一个轻资本行业,资本的形成可能并不是重点,但金融仍然将投资者和用户联系在了一起。对于 IP 资产来说,这种关系尤其重要。

下图描述了 IP 行业的价值流转循环,涉及了三种不同的群体。首先是创造者(builders),他们是创造原创 IP 内容的群体;接着是消费者(consuemrs),他们会观看、分享内容并为此付费;然后是投资者(investors),他们会为内容的创造提供资本帮助,就像他们投资于各大企业一样。

Story Protocol BU FAN:IPFi将如何迭代知识产权市场|FAT Awards 2024

在投资者和创作者之间,前者为后者提供了资本,后者则可利用资本进行 IP 内容创作;在创造者和消费者之间,前者为后者提供了内容及服务价值,反过来后者则会为此付费;在投资者和消费者之间,前者则可从后者的付费中获得收益回馈。金融系统关键在于价值的转移形式,上图中的箭头清晰地指出了价值将如何从一个地方转移到另一个地方。

现在让我们进入 IPFi。IPFi 主要包含两大要素,一是资产形式为 IP,二是具备强大金融系统以保证价值的有效转移。与传统 IP 产业中大多数的价值转移都发生在实体之间进行不同,Story Protocol 希望构建一个开放式系统,让用户能够自由地进行 IP 资产的创造和转移。

需要让我们来厘清一个问题,在不同的发展阶段,IPFi 具体将呈现出什么样的形式?

Story Protocol BU FAN:IPFi将如何迭代知识产权市场|FAT Awards 2024

在我们看来,IPFi 的第一阶段仍将聚焦于构建核心 DeFi 功能。该阶段的主要目标为,为 IP 的资产的创造和价值转移和价值转移提供必要的基础设施,从功能角度则包括 IP 启动平台、IP 资产交易市场、IP 资产货币市场以及必要的 DeFi 激励计划等等。

接下来,我们将进入早期 IPFi 阶段。在该阶段,Story Protocol 将围绕 IP 提供两种不同却相关的代币类型。其一为授权代币,其主要效用为将创造者与消费者连接起来;其二为版税代币,其主要效用为实现 IP 收益的流动,举个例子,当你持有某个 IP 的版税代币,若该 IP 最终以电影等形式获利,你也将通过该代币获得相应的版税收益。我们还希望在早期 IPFi 阶段进行一些实验,比如我们认为所有曾投资过 memecoin 都可以围绕一个共识性形象来构建社区、内容,并将其转变为真正的 IP 项目。

Story Protocol BU FAN:IPFi将如何迭代知识产权市场|FAT Awards 2024

在早期 IPFi 阶段,有一些项目需要重点关注。在传统领域,那些未来具备良好现金流前景的公司在扩大业务时,往往会选择债务融资手段以推动发展。然而在 IP 领域,这样的债务融资结构却并不完善,为什么 IP 创作者必须出售他们的作品呢?在 Story Protocol 的愿景里,完善的结构化 IPFi 将孕育出更多有价值的 IP 资产。

在后期阶段,则需关注一些实验性的 IPFi。举个例子,在开放式的 IP 注册系统下,很多人会在网络之上注册一些“垃圾” IP,为了服务于其中少量的真正具备价值和 IP 资产,需要建立一个权益证明机制。在该机制下,人们可以选择支持最优质的 IP 资产,以实现资产质量的筛选。

Story Protocol BU FAN:IPFi将如何迭代知识产权市场|FAT Awards 2024

总而言之,我们的愿景是通过 IPFi 为 IP 资产创造一个开放的价值转移系统,充分保障各个参与群体的法律权益,让更多的用户能够以较低的成本参与到该系统中来。当前,大多数的 IP 创造者都没有考虑过如何为 IP 融资以及如何变现,Story Protocol  将为他们提供一个便捷、有效的解决方案。

Похожее

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手28 мин. назад

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手28 мин. назад

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手39 мин. назад

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手39 мин. назад

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit45 мин. назад

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit45 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片