India’s crypto trading volume plunges as new tax rules take effect

cryptoslateОпубликовано 2022-04-14Обновлено 2022-04-14

Введение

Crypto trading volume at India-based exchanges fell to its lowest levels in recent years after the country’s new crypto tax rules came into effect on April 1, according to data from crypto research firm Crebaco.

Crypto trading volume at India-based exchanges fell to its lowest levels in recent years after the country’s new crypto tax rules came into effect on April 1, according to data from crypto research firm Crebaco.

WazirX was the most affected exchange, with its U.S. dollar trading volume slumping 72% in less than two weeks. ZebPay came next, with a 59% drop. Volumes on CoinDCX and BitBns fell by 52% and 41%, respectively.

While the sharp decline might partly be a result of the global trend, it is worth noting that the trading volume hit a monthly peak on March 31, indicating that most Indians were closing their positions before the new tax regime took effect.

Currently, India charges a 30% tax on profits from crypto transactions and does not allow crypto holders to offset gains with losses from other crypto transactions. 

A full recovery is unlikely

Notably, the most controversial provision in the new tax system is yet to take effect. The Indian government seeks to levy a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) starting July 1. Experts believe this tax liability will significantly impact the market because intraday traders account for the highest percentage of daily volumes.

Although the 30% capital gains tax is already ripping India’s crypto market apart, some prominent voices in the country are calling for more taxation. An example is Bihar Sushil Kumar Modi, a former chief minister and a current member of the ruling political party.

According to Modi, cryptocurrencies are a form of gambling. To this end, he urged the government to raise taxes on virtual assets. In addition, he argued that cryptos are not commodities, assets, or good services because, unlike shares in the stock market, they are backed by any company.

Похожее

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News1 ч. назад

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News1 ч. назад

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News1 ч. назад

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片