比特币 NFT 新叙事：什么是 Ordinal NFT ? 怎么铸造？

比推Опубликовано 2023-03-01Обновлено 2023-03-01

Введение

Ordinals（序数）是一种允许在比特币区块链上创建 NFT 的协议，它已成为加密社区的最新热门叙事，截至2月28日，超过 213,000 个独特的 Ordinals被铸造，包括DeGods、OnChain Monkey等一些著名项目。Ordinal NFT 是如何工作的？Ordinal NFT 与其他 NFT 有何不同？如何铸造？

最大的 NFT 公司之一正在进军比特币 NFT 浪潮。Yuga Labs 宣布推出基于比特币的 Ordinals 协议铸造的 NFT 系列「TwelveFold」，将包含 300 件限量版生成艺术作品，每件都刻在比特币区块链上，这是迄今为止通过 Ordinals （序数）推出的最吸睛的NFT藏品之一。

Ordinals（序数）是一种允许在比特币区块链上创建 NFT 的协议，它已成为加密社区的最新热门叙事，截至2月28日，超过 213,000 个独特的 Ordinals被铸造，包括DeGods、OnChain Monkey等一些著名项目。

”“

那么，Ordinal NFT 是如何工作的？Ordinal NFT 与其他 NFT 有何不同？如何铸造？

”“

如何运作？

”“

Ordinal NFT 使用 inscriptions（铭文）来工作，铭文由 Ordinal 理论通过由 Casey Rodarmor 开发的序数协议提供支持。 Ordinal 理论旨在赋予 satoshis（比特币的最小单位“聪”，占一枚比特币的 1/100,000,000）“个人身份，使他们能够被追踪、转移并赋予意义。”

”“

简单来说，Ordinal 协议为每个 satoshi 分配一个序号。在分配了这个数字之后，每个聪就可以通过比特币交易来刻上图片、文本或视频等数据。一旦该交易被挖掘，任意数据将永久成为比特币区块链的一部分，并且可以通过支持 Ordinal 的比特币钱包和在线 Ordinal 查看器查看。

”“

与其他 NFT 有何不同？

”“

Ordinal NFT 和其他 NFT 之间的一个主要区别与数据存储有关。

”“

大多数 NFT 都是通过 ERC-721 非同质代币标准使用以太坊区块链创建的。 ERC 721 是一个标准，它概述了应该如何创建 NFT，以便它在整个以太坊生态系统中得到正确识别。 创建 ERC-721 NFT 时，元数据文件——字面上提供有关其他数据信息的数据（因此称为“元数据”）——提供有关 NFT 的信息。 最简单的理解方式是，NFT 本身就是一份证明另一项物品所有权的合约，在该元数据中有详细说明。 对于最常见的 NFT，即数字艺术，实际的 JPG 或艺术文件通常存储在以太坊区块链之外，元数据包括指向该文件的链接。 这意味着实际文件或艺术品可以更改，因为它没有嵌入区块链中。

”“

比特币的Ordinal NFT 的不同之处在于，没有描述 NFT 的可参考元数据文件； 相反，整个数据文件驻留在比特币交易的见证签名字段中。 这意味着整个 Ordinal NFT 都在区块链上生存和呼吸。以太坊和 Solana 上的 NFT 主要指向包含 NFT 主图像的链下数据库，但比特币 NFT 或 Ordinals 利用比特币代码的最新更新将艺术品存储在区块链本身上。

”“

这是否重要取决于用户，但Ordinal NFT 为 NFT 带来了额外的不变性。

”“

如何铸造 Ordinal NFT？

”“

Ordinal NFT 刚刚兴起，因此随着生态系统的建立，它们的可访问性受到限制。 现在有两种主要的方法来铸造自己的 Ordinal NFT。

”“

第一种方法是启动一个完整的比特币节点并在该节点上运行 Ord。 然后你可以开始将 satoshis 写入你控制的钱包中以制作 Ordinal NFT。 这种方法技术含量高，更适合懂技术的爱好者和真正热爱NFT的人。

”“

另一种刻写 Ordinal NFT 的方法是使用无代码刻写工具。 如果您信任比特币区块链，那么这是一种更加随意的体验并且效果很好。我拥有一个 Ordinal NFT，我使用名为 Gamma 的无代码工具铸造了它，对于熟悉比特币的人来说，它相对简单，但某些步骤可能有些棘手。

”“

以下为铸造过程：

”“

在开始之前，请确保您有一些比特币（价值约 50 美元），以便您可以支付 inscriptions（铭文）的交易费。 你拥有的钱包必须能够将比特币发送到 Taproot 地址。 您需要查找的内容位于“发送至 Bech32m”列中，不是“发送至 Bech32”，因此请再三确认。 Bech32m 列中弹出“是”选项表示钱包可以将比特币发送到 Taproot 地址。 请注意，Coinbase 和 Binance 等热门交易所不支持 Taproot。

”“

一旦您的钱包中有了比特币交易费，您就可以开始铸造您的 Ordinal NFT。 这是使用 Gamma 铸造第一个 Ordinal 的分步步骤。也可以使用 OrdinalsBot 等工具，过程大同小异。

”“

>前往：http://: https://gamma.io/ordinals

”“

>选择您的inscriptions（铭文）类型，图像文件或纯文本。

”“

>通过从桌面选择文件或直接在指定位置输入文本来上传所需文件。

”“

>根据您愿意等待 NFT 铸造的时间来选择交易费率，请留意为各种费率选择提供的估计铸造时间。

这是该过程中棘手的部分之一。 下一步是指定应将 Ordinal NFT 发送到的比特币地址。 该地址需要是Taproot 地址或Ordinal兼容地址。

建议在此步骤中使用 Sparrow Wallet，设置 Sparrow 钱包地址后，将其放入 Gamma 网站上的“收件人比特币地址”字段。 确保此地址的前四个字符是“bc1p”。 此前缀表示该地址是 Taproot 地址。

”“

>通过将指定数量的比特币发送到指定地址来支付铸造 Ordinal NFT 的交易费用。 请注意，此地址也将以“bc1p”开头（十分重要！！请再三确认）。 建议用与接收 Ordinal NFT 的钱包不同的钱包发送比特币付款，除非你真的知道自己在做什么并且非常熟悉这些操作。 一旦不小心，可能会错误地发送一个之前刻录的聪，你将无法再访问该 NFT。

”“

>等待。这可能需要几天时间，具体取决于选择的费率，你将收到一个链接，用于检查铸币状态。

”“

>通过 Ordinal 查看器验收你的 NFT 成果。

”“

一如既往，请对你在比特币区块链上的行为保持清醒和谨慎。Ordinal是新的，不要忽视每一个细节，你在比特币上所做的一切都可以很容易地被追踪。 所以请注意，无论你做什么，都能被追踪到。

”“

快乐铸造吧！

Похожее

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit30 мин. назад

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit30 мин. назад

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit36 мин. назад

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit36 мин. назад

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit36 мин. назад

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit36 мин. назад

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报45 мин. назад

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报45 мин. назад

$52M Ethereum Bet Comes As Tom Lee Says ETH Isn’t Reflecting Its Potential

Bitmine, holding over 5.4 million ETH worth more than $10.5 billion, is nearing its goal to control 5% of Ethereum's circulating supply. Despite the company's recent purchase of 26,497 ETH (valued at roughly $52 million), Ethereum's price has struggled, trading around $2,000 and even declining recently. Bitmine's head, Tom Lee, argues that ETH prices are not reflecting the strengthening fundamentals of the Ethereum network, attributing the lag to being in the early stages of a "crypto spring." He cites long-term trends like AI commerce and tokenization as reasons for Ethereum's enduring importance. Bitmine's strategy treats Ether as a long-term reserve asset, not a short-term trade, explaining why the massive accumulation hasn't yet triggered a corresponding price rally.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

$52M Ethereum Bet Comes As Tom Lee Says ETH Isn’t Reflecting Its Potential

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow