Zhao Changpeng's Year-End Report: Ten Questions on Binance, Regulation, and the Future of Crypto

比推Published on 2025-12-19Last updated on 2025-12-19

Abstract

CZ, founder of Binance, shares his reflections and insights in a year-end Q&A. He discusses his post-clemency sense of vindication and his current focus on four key areas: Giggle Academy (a free education platform serving 90,000 children), YZ Labs (a $10B ecosystem fund investing in crypto projects), mentoring BNB Chain entrepreneurs, and advising governments on crypto regulation. He highlights significant growth metrics: BNB Chain’s 600% annual transaction growth, 2M daily active users, and Binance’s 200M users. On investment strategy, he rejects the "horse race" approach, advocating instead for an "open garden" model that supports multiple strong teams to foster competition and innovation. CZ breaks down stablecoin evolution: 1.0 (basic, non-yielding tokens like USDT), 1.5 (yield-bearing but adoption-limited, e.g., Ethena’s USDe), and 2.0 (ideal state combining yield, liquidity, and compliance). He notes improved regulatory openness globally. He emphasizes mission-driven founders with long-term commitment and stamina, dismissing short-term profit seekers. On AI trading agents, he argues successful strategies won’t be sold widely due to market saturation effects. For RWA tokenization, he sees potential in national asset tokenization for resource development and notes crypto’s suitability for AI/agent economies. CZ advises BNB Chain to focus on relentless building, comparing it to a long marathon. His final message: he isn’t defined by his content, embodying a calm, persi...

Article Author: Lin Wanwan's Cat (@linwanwan823)

Article Source: X

Original Title: Chinese Billionaire Zhao Changpeng's Year-End Ten Q&A


The BNB Shareholders' Annual Meeting just concluded.

After listening to CZ's year-end AMA, I've selected and summarized 10 Q&As.

Key Points: Prediction markets, Stablecoin War 2.0 hasn't started yet.

1. How do you feel after being pardoned?

CZ: "Psychologically, there's a feeling of vindication, finally free."

But daily life hasn't changed. He still works from home every day and exercises for 30-45 minutes daily, a habit he picked up in prison.

2. What does CZ do every day?

Four things:

• Giggle Academy — His "pet project," a completely free education platform, 60-person team, already serving 90,000 children

• YZ Labs — $10 billion ecosystem fund, invested in nearly 70 projects in 2025, reviewed over 1,000

• BNB Ecosystem — No longer does technical work, mainly mentors young entrepreneurs

• Advising governments — Talks with high-level officials from over a dozen countries about regulatory frameworks, including Pakistan, UAE, etc.

But this last one takes far more time than he expected.

3. The proudest numbers for 2025?

• Giggle Academy: 90,000 students, larger than many universities

• BNB Chain: 600% year-on-year transaction growth, 2.4 million daily active users

• Binance: 200 million users

• Crypto industry: Wealth penetration rate is probably still less than 1%

He added: The market cap of cryptocurrency can still grow by several orders of magnitude.

4. Why invest in multiple prediction markets? Is it a "horse race"?

Someone asked, you've invested in several prediction markets (Probable, etc.), is it a "horse race," letting them compete to see who comes out on top?

CZ denied this, giving a clear framework: It's not a horse race, it's an "open garden."

"There are multiple e-commerce sites, multiple search engines on the internet, would you call that a horse race? That's just how the market naturally operates."

YZ Labs principle: Never make exclusive investments. Especially in the early stages, as long as the team is strong, they support them.

Why invest in multiple early on?

CZ's logic:

1. Competition grows the pie. Different teams try different directions, serving users in different regions.

2. Validate which features users actually want. For example, Probable's "staking funds while earning yield," if users like it, others will copy; if no one cares, they won't.

3. Strong teams can also fail. A good product doesn't guarantee success, various issues can arise, so hedge with multiple bets.

How does he judge early-stage projects?

"I look at the product, but I'm really judging the team's ability to deliver through the product."

Today's features aren't important; what matters is if the demand changes tomorrow, can they respond quickly, iterate fast.

CZ sees the next big battleground node: The World Cup.

Polymarket exploded during the US election (more accurate than polls), CZ says the industry is now looking at the 2026 World Cup.

"Which team works tirelessly, at least short-term, will win."

But he also said: Real victory is long-term, seeing who can persist, who has execution, who is mission-driven.

5. The future of stablecoins?

Stablecoin War: 1.0 is over, 2.0 hasn't started

This part CZ explained most thoroughly, almost defining industry generations.

Stablecoin 1.0: Simple and crude

Model: Deposit USD in bank → issue token → token transfers instantly on-chain → arbitrageurs use it for cross-exchange arbitrage.

Problem: No yield. You hold USDT, Tether uses your money to buy treasury bonds and earn interest, you get nothing.

Tether, with first-mover advantage + network effects, now rumored valuation of $50 billion, annual revenue in the tens of billions. So many want a piece of the pie.

Stablecoin 1.5: Starting to offer yield

CZ specifically praised YZ Labs' investment, Ethena's USDe.

But the problem: Ethena's adoption is limited by exchange integration. Not all exchanges support it, there's friction to use.

Stablecoin 2.0: Yield + Liquidity + Compliance,三位一体 (Trinity)

CZ said the ideal state is simple:

"A stablecoin that gives you good yield, while being tradable on most exchanges. Sounds simple, hard to achieve."

Why is it hard?

Need to convince many exchanges to list it

Need to ensure the yield source is sustainable

Need compliance (this is easier now)

BNB Chain's stablecoin landscape

CZ outlined it:

USDT on BNB, long-term is a wrapped version, not native

FDUSD, BNB Chain supported it, but "fiat channel friction is high," growth limited

USD1, a strong project from the US, now a relatively native choice on BNB Chain

U, a new project just announced today, CZ says it has "some really interesting potential"

Regulatory environment has changed

This is key. CZ said it's completely different from a year ago:

The US has the GENIUS bill progressing

Regulators in other countries are "no longer super hostile to stablecoins"

"The regulatory environment is much more open now, more opportunities will be seen."

Will only one remain in the end?

CZ's judgment: Network effects will eventually kick in, users will gradually concentrate towards the most compelling option.

But it's still early, everyone is trying different models. He "loves seeing it".

6. What do you value most when investing?

A few words: Mission-driven.

CZ said he fears two types of people:

1. Those who just want to make a quick buck and run ("cash out and leave at $10M/$100M")

2. Those who change tracks every three months ("that shows you don't love anything")

Also need physical stamina. Entrepreneurship is physical labor, requires enduring for a long time, immense pressure.

7. Will AI trading agents be the next big thing?

CZ presented a logical paradox:

"If an AI algorithm could really make big money, why sell it to others? Unless you lack capital. But it's too easy for good teams to raise funds now."

More fatal problem: The more people use the same strategy, the worse it performs. The market is mass psychology, the first to use a strategy wins, the last loses.

His conclusion: AI will be used by everyone for trading, but in customized ways, not by buying off-the-shelf platforms.

8. Can RWA tokenization really take off?

CZ said he is seriously discussing national asset tokenization with high-level officials in multiple countries.

Gave an example: US shale oil was hard to extract, but because of a developed capital market, oil companies IPO'd and raised funds to develop technology.

Tokenization can replicate this path: Country tokenizes rare earths/minerals → raises funds → develops industry. Not selling resources, but using tokens to leverage capital.

Another view: AI and robots will definitely use cryptocurrency in the future.

Why? Robots can't open bank accounts, can't do KYC, can't take selfies for verification, can't swipe cards. Traditional finance is designed for humans, not for agents.

9. How will BNB Chain make a comeback?

CZ's answer: Keep building quietly.

"You won't always be the most profitable, won't always be the sexiest, won't even always be the most successful. But you just keep doing what you're good at."

He used an analogy: Marathon + boxing match. Keep running and throw a few punches, but never stop.

Nvidia took 40 years to become the most valuable company. The first 20-30 years? No one thought they would make it.

10. Final bonus question

Someone asked: If all your speeches, tweets were deleted, and you only had 60 seconds to leave a message for the world, what would you say?

CZ said: "I don't feel defined by my content. If it were all gone, I'd probably just say 'Good morning,' and still many people would reply to me."

This might be the most CZ answer of the entire session.

BNB shareholders, did you receive the CZ alpha?


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7596943

Related Questions

QWhat are the four main activities CZ is currently focusing on after his pardon?

ACZ is focusing on four main activities: Giggle Academy (a free education platform), YZ Labs (a $10 billion ecosystem fund), mentoring young entrepreneurs in the BNB ecosystem, and advising governments on regulatory frameworks.

QHow does CZ view the competition among multiple prediction market projects, and what is his investment philosophy?

ACZ does not see it as a 'horse race' but as an 'open garden' where competition helps grow the market. YZ Labs never makes exclusive investments in early stages, supporting strong teams to explore different directions and validate user needs.

QAccording to CZ, what are the key characteristics of Stablecoin 2.0, and why is it difficult to achieve?

AStablecoin 2.0 aims to combine yield, liquidity, and compliance. It is difficult because it requires convincing multiple exchanges to list the stablecoin, ensuring sustainable yield sources, and navigating regulatory challenges, though compliance has become easier recently.

QWhat does CZ consider the most important quality in entrepreneurs when making investments?

ACZ values mission-driven entrepreneurs who are committed long-term, avoiding those who only seek quick profits or frequently change business directions. He also emphasizes the importance of physical stamina for enduring the pressures of entrepreneurship.

QWhat is CZ's perspective on the future of AI trading agents and RWA tokenization?

ACZ is skeptical about AI trading agents as a product because profitable strategies are unlikely to be shared widely. For RWA tokenization, he believes it can enable countries to tokenize assets like minerals to raise capital for industrial development, and that AI and robots will naturally use cryptocurrencies due to limitations in traditional financial systems.

Related Reads

When AI Begins to Audit the World: From Claude Discovering the ZEC Vulnerability, Watching the Encryption Industry Enter the 'Recursive Security Era'

**When AI Audits the World: From Claude's Discovery of a ZEC Vulnerability, Viewing the Crypto Industry Entering a "Recursive Security Era"** This article examines a pivotal shift in the blockchain security landscape, triggered by the convergence of two events: Anthropic's research on AI's "Recursive Self-Improvement" and Claude Opus 4.8's discovery of a critical vulnerability in Zcash's code. Traditionally, crypto security has relied on human experts and automated tools for periodic audits. However, the article argues AI is transitioning from a mere tool to an active participant in understanding and analyzing complex systems. Claude's ability to identify a subtle flaw in Zcash's zero-knowledge proof system demonstrates AI's potential to dramatically lower the cost and time required for risk discovery. This goes beyond finding a single bug; it signals a change in the very mechanism of how vulnerabilities are found. The core thesis introduces the concept of "Recursive Security," drawing a parallel to Anthropic's "Recursive Self-Improvement." Just as AI can accelerate its own development through feedback loops, security systems are evolving towards a continuous cycle of analysis, risk identification, remediation, and re-analysis. Security is becoming a persistent, evolving capability integrated into a system's lifecycle, rather than a one-time pre-launch audit. This shift is particularly urgent for the crypto industry, where system complexity from Layer-2 networks, modular architectures, and ZK-proofs is growing faster than human analysis capacity. AI excels at the pattern recognition and contextual understanding needed to navigate this complexity. Importantly, the article cautions that AI augments both defenders and potential attackers, accelerating the entire threat landscape. The future competitive advantage may not lie in having zero vulnerabilities, but in having the fastest risk discovery, validation, and response capabilities. The Claude-Zcash incident is thus an early signal of an era where AI-driven, recursive security systems become essential for managing risk in an increasingly complex digital world.

marsbit42m ago

When AI Begins to Audit the World: From Claude Discovering the ZEC Vulnerability, Watching the Encryption Industry Enter the 'Recursive Security Era'

marsbit42m ago

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

From MSTR to STRC+: The Evolution and Limits of the Strategy Universe This article examines the transformation of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) from a simple "Bitcoin treasury" company into a complex financial engineering firm building a BTC-backed credit system. **Core Thesis:** Strategy's true significance lies not just in its massive BTC holdings (~844k BTC), but in its attempt to transform this static reserve into a multi-layered credit curve within traditional capital markets and, subsequently, into on-chain yield infrastructure. **The MSTR Flywheel:** The initial model was a reflexive loop: BTC price rises → MSTR stock rises → company raises capital (debt/equity) at a premium → buys more BTC → increases per-share BTC exposure → MSTR premium grows. This "amplified Bitcoin" equity (MSTR) thrives on bullish momentum but is vulnerable to tightening premiums and rising funding costs. **Building the Credit Curve:** Strategy's innovation is slicing its single BTC balance sheet into different risk/return profiles via specialized securities: * **MSTR:** High-volatility equity layer absorbing full BTC upside/downside. * **STRC:** Key product. A perpetual preferred stock designed as "short duration high yield credit," offering ~11.5% floating monthly dividends. It attracts fixed-income investors seeking yield without direct BTC exposure, funding Strategy's operations. * **STRD/STRK/STRF:** Other preferred/share classes with varying durations, conversion rights, and fixed dividends. **Risks of the STRC Model:** STRC's high yield is not risk-free. Its stability depends on: 1) Sufficient BTC asset coverage, 2) Strategy's continued ability to pay dividends, and 3) Market faith in the MSTR/STRC funding flywheel. Stress points include deep BTC price declines eroding the asset buffer, rising dividend costs if STRC trades below par, and a broken flywheel if MSTR's premium (mNAV) falls persistently. **On-Chain Expansion: STRC+:** Projects like **Saturn** and **Apyx** aim to package STRC's (and other DAT preferred stock) cash flows into on-chain stablecoin yield (e.g., sUSDat, apyUSD). They offer DeFi a new yield source distinct from trading fees or incentives—cash dividends from traditional securities. However, this introduces compounded risks: off-chain custody, issuer credit risk, BTC volatility, and protocol execution risk. **Conclusion: The Ultimate Boundary** Strategy's endgame is not infinite BTC accumulation. It is the market's long-term acceptance of a new credit system where BTC serves as collateral for tradable securities whose cash flows can power on-chain financial applications. Its "universe" expands if this BTC-native credit curve gains legitimacy, but contracts if these instruments are repriced purely as high-risk, yield-bearing credit assets without stablecoin mythology.

marsbit1h ago

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片