What next for Litecoin’s price after its $80-floor cracks?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-19Last updated on 2025-12-19

Abstract

Litecoin (LTC) experienced significant bearish pressure, dropping 7.5% in a short period and breaking below the critical long-term support zone of $80–$84. The price fell to a new low of $72.64, with a slight recovery to $75.89 at the time of writing. The loss of the $80 support level suggests a continued downtrend, with potential bearish targets at $73.4, $66.5, and $59.6. Although a short-term bounce toward the $82–$83 magnetic zone is possible, the overall trend remains bearish due to a lack of buying pressure and persistent selling momentum. Traders are advised to consider shorting any rebounds, targeting lower support levels.

On Thursday, 18 April, Bitcoin [BTC] bounced to $89.5k before sinking to post a new low of $84.5k. This volatility saw Litecoin’s price [LTC] drop 7.5% in 5 hours, with the altcoin posting a new lower low at $72.64. At the time of writing, it was trading at $75.89.

Litecoin bulls gave up control of a key long-term support zone at $80-$84 over the past two weeks of trading. In fact, a recent AMBCrypto report highlighted the importance of this region as a long-term support.

The same report also pointed out that the bulls had little fighting strength and were barely holding on. LTC’s inclusion in Bitwise’s 10 Crypto Index ETF [BITW] gave it no sizeable boost on the price charts either.

Assessing the strength of the next downward Litecoin trend

Using the Fixed Range Volume Profile tool for 2025, the Value Area High and Value Area Low were determined to be at $120 and $83. After the first week of October, when LTC had been trading above the year’s VAH, the 10/10 crash occurred.

The OBV showed that the buyer-seller equilibrium back then shifted to an almost total seller domination. Litecoin saw volatility in November and appeared to defend the $80-support zone. However, it was too little to stop the downtrend.

With the loss of the $80-level, $73.4, $66.5, and $59.6 were the next long-term supports that Litecoin bears would target.

The 1-month lookback period liquidation heatmap showed that the liquidity around $73 was swept. A bounce was in progress. It may be possible that this bounce would reach the magnetic zone at $82-$83.

The less likely scenario ahead for Litecoin

This would be the bullish path. The magnetic zone at $88 is filled with short liquidations and could pull prices towards it. A market-wide sentiment shift and a cascade of short liquidations could see an LTC breakout past $90, reclaiming a bullish trend.

Traders’ call to action – Remain bearish!

The altcoin has just recently lost a significant support level. Its trend and price structure were bearish, and there was no appreciable buying pressure on the higher timeframes.

The $80-$84 area, if retested, would be too strong to overcome. Traders can look to short the bounce, targeting the support levels at $66 and $59.

Final Thoughts

  • Over the past two weeks, Litecoin bulls fought to defend the $80-demand zone but lacked the strength to succeed.
  • The selling pressure since the second week of October has not let up, with recent Bitcoin losses cementing bearish conviction.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Related Questions

QWhat key support level did Litecoin's price recently break below, and what was the significance of this level?

ALitecoin recently broke below the key long-term support zone at $80-$84, which was a significant demand area that bulls had been defending but lacked the strength to maintain.

QAccording to the Fixed Range Volume Profile for 2025, what are the Value Area High (VAH) and Value Area Low (VAL) for Litecoin?

AThe Value Area High (VAH) is at $120 and the Value Area Low (VAL) is at $83 for Litecoin in 2025.

QWhat are the next potential long-term support levels for Litecoin if the bearish trend continues below $80?

AThe next long-term support levels below $80 are $73.4, $66.5, and $59.6, which are the targets for Litecoin bears.

QWhat is the 'less likely scenario' or bullish path described for Litecoin's price action?

AThe less likely bullish scenario involves a market-wide sentiment shift and a cascade of short liquidations that could pull prices toward the magnetic zone at $88 and potentially see a breakout past $90, reclaiming a bullish trend.

QWhat trading advice does the article give regarding Litecoin's current trend and price structure?

AThe article advises traders to remain bearish, suggesting they look to short any bounce with targets at the support levels of $66 and $59, as the $80-$84 area is now expected to be a strong resistance if retested.

Related Reads

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

Hyperliquid, a cryptocurrency derivatives platform, is facing formal complaints from two major traditional exchanges, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the New York Stock Exchange). The firms have jointly approached the U.S. Congress and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), urging stricter regulatory oversight of Hyperliquid's operations. The action highlights growing tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto-native platforms in the derivatives market.

链捕手2h ago

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

链捕手2h ago

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit2h ago

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit2h ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手2h ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手2h ago

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

Bitcoin's recent recovery from February lows is approaching a critical supply cluster between $84,000 and $88,000, which holds the largest concentration of Bitcoin supply on the current chart. This zone represents the cost basis for short-term holders (investors who bought within the last 155 days) and is stacked with "trapped" sellers who bought near those levels and are now at breakeven. Technical analysis suggests the rally faces significant resistance in this area. Two primary scenarios are outlined: a direct push into the $84k-$86k zone followed by a rejection and pullback to $70,000 support, or a more volatile path involving a dip before testing the supply cluster. A weekly close above $84,000 would weaken the bearish rejection case, but a decisive break above $86,900-$88,000 is needed for a stronger bullish confirmation. Bitcoin is currently trading around $80,430.

bitcoinist2h ago

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

bitcoinist2h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit4h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow