Vietnam Opens Crypto Exchange Licensing as Pilot Goes Live

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-22Last updated on 2026-01-22

Abstract

Vietnam has officially opened the licensing process for cryptocurrency exchanges, accepting applications from January 20, 2026, as part of a state-led pilot program to regulate the crypto market. This move, enabled by recent legal frameworks including the Law on the Digital Technology Industry, recognizes crypto as property but not legal tender, maintaining a ban on its use for payments. Despite the launch, no exchanges have been approved yet. About ten securities firms and banks—including SSI Securities, VIX Securities, and major banks like Military Bank—have announced plans to apply but are still preparing infrastructure pending regulatory clearance. Vietnam’s framework is among Asia’s strictest, requiring licensed entities to be Vietnamese-owned with at least $380 million in capital, 65% institutional ownership, and a 49% foreign cap. The regime aims to shift the crypto market toward institutional control but limits entry to well-capitalized players.

Vietnam has officially begun the procedure of accepting applications for licenses to allow the trade of virtual assets, a procedure that has been viewed as a milestone step towards the launch of a long-awaited cryptocurrency market. The State Securities Commission of Vietnam (SSC) confirmed the move on Tuesday, stating that it will accept applications starting Jan. 20, 2026, as part of its wider plan to bring crypto under formal oversight.

The licensing window follows the release of updated administrative procedures under Decision No. 96 from Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance. The decision operationalizes an earlier resolution that laid the groundwork for piloting a regulated crypto asset market over a multi-year timeframe.

Vietnam activates its crypto pilot after years of planning

Vietnam’s new licensing phase also builds on the Law on the Digital Technology Industry, which took effect on Jan. 1, 2026. This law defines digital assets and crypto assets in statute for the first time, giving regulators a clearer legal foundation to supervise exchanges and trading platforms.

However, Vietnam still draws a hard line between recognition and payment use. While the country recognizes crypto assets as property, it does not classify them as legal tender. Regulators also maintain restrictions that prevent crypto from being used as an official payment method, reinforcing the government’s cautious approach.

Banks and brokerages prepare to enter the market

Even though the pilot now has a live licensing process, Vietnam has not yet confirmed any approved exchanges. In October 2025, the Ministry of Finance said no company had applied for participation in the five-year crypto pilot at the time due to strict requirements and high capital thresholds.

Now, with Wednesday’s report in Vietnam News that about 10 securities companies and banks have publicly announced plans to participate once regulators give the word on licensing.

These include SSI Securities, which launched SSI Digital in 2022, and VIX Securities, which invested in its exchange-focused unit VIXEX. Major banks such as Military Bank, Techcombank, and VPBank have also signaled interest.

Importantly, these institutions are not yet operating licensed trading platforms. Instead, they are preparing applications and internal infrastructure, planning to launch only after regulatory clearance.

No exchange approvals yet despite licensing launch

Despite the milestone, Vietnam has not announced that it has received or approved any applications since opening the window. That gap matters because it highlights that Vietnam is still in the early operational phase of the pilot, where paperwork begins, but enforcement and approvals may take time.

This also means market participants cannot yet assume that the licensing process will produce fast results, especially given the government’s cautious stance.

Vietnam enforces one of the region’s strictest frameworks

Vietnam’s crypto licensing framework ranks among the most restrictive in Asia. When the country launched its five-year crypto market pilot in September 2025, it introduced rules that sharply limit what exchanges and platforms can do.

Under the framework, applicants must be Vietnamese entities with a minimum paid-in capital of 10 trillion dong (about $380 million). Institutional shareholders must hold at least 65% of the capital, and foreign ownership cannot exceed 49%.

Vietnam also bans the issuance of digital assets backed by fiat currencies or securities, signaling that regulators want trading activity under strict control and without stablecoin-like structures inside the pilot.

If this regime is implemented by Vietnam successfully, then it has the ability to shift the market from informal participation to institution-led trading; however, the strict bar to licensing ensures that only major players with deep balance sheets can enter.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Strive Targets $150M Raise to Cut Debt and Buy More Bitcoin

TagsCryptoCrypto LawCrypto Marketdigital asset exchangeVietnam

Related Questions

QWhen does Vietnam officially begin accepting applications for cryptocurrency exchange licenses?

AVietnam officially begins accepting applications for cryptocurrency exchange licenses starting January 20, 2026.

QWhat is the minimum paid-in capital requirement for entities applying for a crypto exchange license in Vietnam?

AApplicants must have a minimum paid-in capital of 10 trillion dong (approximately $380 million).

QHow does Vietnam's legal framework classify cryptocurrency assets?

AVietnam recognizes crypto assets as property but does not classify them as legal tender, and their use as an official payment method is restricted.

QWhat are the ownership restrictions for crypto exchanges under Vietnam's new framework?

AInstitutional shareholders must hold at least 65% of the capital, and foreign ownership cannot exceed 49%.

QWhich Vietnamese financial institutions have announced plans to participate in the crypto market pilot?

ASSI Securities (with SSI Digital), VIX Securities (with VIXEX), and major banks such as Military Bank, Techcombank, and VPBank have signaled interest.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit5m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit5m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit15m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit15m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片