U.S. Crypto Reserves Shrink by 26%: No 'Strategy' for Purchases, Only Shrinking 'Reserves'

比推Published on 2026-03-06Last updated on 2026-03-06

Abstract

A year after former US President Donald Trump signed an executive order establishing a "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" and a "US Digital Asset Reserve," the value of the US government's cryptocurrency holdings has fallen by 26%, from over $30 billion to approximately $22.39 billion. The reserves, which consist primarily of seized assets and are not involve new purchases, include about 328,272 Bitcoin (valued at roughly $22 billion), as well as Ethereum, USDC, wrapped Bitcoin, and BNB. The government has not increased its Bitcoin holdings since the order was issued and has no plans to use taxpayer funds for additional acquisitions. Officials emphasize that market volatility does not change the administration's commitment to US leadership in crypto, but critics warn that a lack of transparency and a clear framework could distort markets and erode public trust.

Author: Cointelegraph

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

Original title: U.S. Still Has No Plans to Advance Bitcoin Strategic Reserve


One year ago, U.S. President Trump signed an executive order to establish a U.S. Strategic Cryptocurrency Reserve. Now, a year later, the reserve's value has shrunk by billions of dollars.

Early in his administration, Trump established a special task force to study how the government could better implement and regulate cryptocurrencies, including plans for Bitcoin and cryptocurrency reserves.

Over the past year, the Trump administration has introduced multiple macroeconomic and policy adjustments. Among them, friendly regulatory policies from Washington have been beneficial for cryptocurrencies, but punitive tariffs and escalating geopolitical tensions have had negative impacts.

Currently, the number of tokens in the U.S. cryptocurrency reserve has remained largely unchanged since its establishment.

Trump's Crypto Reserve Largely Unchanged

On March 6, Trump established the "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" and the "U.S. Digital Asset Reserve" via executive orders. The Bitcoin Reserve contains only Bitcoin, while the Digital Asset Reserve includes various altcoins. Before the order was issued, Trump had stated that the reserve would include XRP, Solana, and Cardano.

Source: Donald Trump

These two reserves "will not acquire additional assets by any means other than forfeiture proceedings."

This executive order essentially consolidated previously scattered seized assets from multiple federal regulatory and law enforcement agencies. The order stated that centralizing ownership, control, and management of these assets within the federal government would ensure proper oversight, accurate tracking, and a unified approach to managing the government's cryptocurrency holdings.

The government has not disclosed specific details of the Bitcoin Reserve and Digital Asset Reserve, but blockchain analytics company Arkham Research has identified multiple blockchain wallets associated with the U.S. government.

As of press time, the total value of cryptocurrencies held by the U.S. government is approximately $22.39 billion, with Bitcoin alone accounting for about $22 billion. Other major holdings include the stablecoin USDC, Ether, Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), and BNB.

(Data collected on March 4)

It is currently unclear how much of these assets belong to the formal reserve, and whether and how these assets have been transferred. However, the dollar value of the reserve has significantly decreased. Arkham data shows that when Trump signed the executive order, the total value of crypto assets held by the U.S. was over $30 billion. As of press time, this figure has dropped to $22 billion, a decline of 26%.

Significant decline in the value of the U.S. crypto asset portfolio since March 2025. Source: Arkham

The White House does not appear to be swayed by this. Deputy Press Secretary Kush Desai, commenting on the recent price drop, said: "In a free market, the government does not set prices. Market volatility does not change the Trump administration's determination to ensure U.S. dominance in cryptocurrency and other frontier technologies."

Bitcoin Holdings Unchanged, No Purchase Plans Yet

Despite hopes from staunch Bitcoin supporters that the U.S. government would start buying Bitcoin, the amount of Bitcoin held by the government has not changed. Since the executive order was signed, the U.S. government has held approximately 328,272 Bitcoin.

U.S. Bitcoin holdings have remained constant since the reserve's establishment. Source: Arkham

Ether is the second-largest crypto asset held by the U.S. government. Its quantity decreased after the executive order was signed, possibly due to exchanges or transfers. However, after April 2025, Ether holdings have remained largely stable.

Changes in Ether holdings. Source: Arkham

Tether's USDT is the largest stablecoin held by the U.S. government. It saw a significant increase of over 200 million tokens in May 2025, before falling back to pre-March 2026 levels.

Changes in USDT holdings. Source: Arkham

These buying and selling patterns are not entirely clear. As mentioned, the government has not publicly disclosed specific transaction volumes.

The new crypto reserve strategy does not completely rule out the possibility of the government buying Bitcoin, but requires that any purchases must be made in a way that "does not impact the budget." Commissioner for AI and Crypto Affairs David Sacks said last year: "Cannot increase the deficit, cannot increase debt, cannot tax the American people."

"Not a single penny from taxpayers. But if the Treasury Secretaries can find a way to accumulate more Bitcoin without burdening taxpayers, they can do so."

A year on, it is unclear whether the government has developed such a strategy, or how it would be implemented.

Jason Yanowitz, co-founder of crypto company Blockworks, told the BBC last year that a crypto reserve containing a variety of different assets could negatively impact the market. "Without a clear framework, arbitrarily selecting assets can distort markets and lead to a loss of public trust," he said. "Ensuring transparency through independent audits and public reporting is crucial for fostering innovation and avoiding favoritism."

Following the success of software company-turned-Bitcoin investment vehicle Strategy, the idea of establishing Bitcoin reserves gained traction last year, both at the state and corporate levels. The narrative of Bitcoin as "digital gold" made holding the asset attractive for government budgets.

According to data from tracking website BitcoinTreasuries.net, 10 countries including the United States, China, Ukraine, El Salvador, the United Kingdom, and North Korea currently hold Bitcoin.

At the corporate level, analysts expect industry consolidation as the bear market continues. Wojciech Kasicki, Chief Strategy Officer of crypto infrastructure and treasury company BTCS, previously told Cointelegraph that companies with Bitcoin treasury values below net asset value might be acquired by operating businesses.

Bitcoin reserves remain a new concept and have not yet been tested through a full crypto winter.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7617407

Related Questions

QWhat was the total value of the US government's cryptocurrency holdings when the strategic reserve was established, and what is it now?

AWhen the strategic reserve was established, the US government's cryptocurrency holdings were valued at over $30 billion. As of the article's publication, that value has decreased to approximately $22.39 billion, a decline of 26%.

QAccording to the executive order, how can the US government acquire additional assets for its crypto reserves?

AAccording to the executive order, the US government can only acquire additional assets for its crypto reserves through forfeiture proceedings, not through purchases or any other means.

QWhat is the government's position on the recent price decline of its crypto assets, as stated by the deputy press secretary?

AThe deputy press secretary, Kush Desai, stated that in a free market, the government does not set prices, and market volatility does not change the Trump administration's determination to ensure US dominance in cryptocurrency and other frontier technologies.

QWhat was the condition set by Commissioner David Sacks for the government to potentially purchase more Bitcoin?

ACommissioner David Sacks stated that any purchase of Bitcoin must be done in a way that is 'budget-neutral,' meaning it cannot add to the deficit, increase debt, or tax the American people. Taxpayers should not spend a single penny.

QWhich other countries, besides the US, are listed as holding Bitcoin according to BitcoinTreasuries.net?

AAccording to BitcoinTreasuries.net, the countries that hold Bitcoin, besides the US, are China, Ukraine, El Salvador, the United Kingdom, and North Korea, among others, for a total of 10 nations.

Related Reads

Vitalik's Vision for the Next Evolution of On-Chain Finance: How to Reconstruct DeFi with an 'Options Mindset'?

Vitalik Buterin recently proposed a conceptual shift for DeFi: replacing traditional Collateralized Debt Positions (CDPs) and forced liquidations with an options-based mechanism. This aims to address key vulnerabilities in current DeFi lending. The traditional CDP model, foundational to protocols like MakerDAO and Aave, allows users to borrow against collateral but relies on real-time oracles and triggers sudden, mandatory liquidations during price volatility. This can cause cascading sell-offs, oracle manipulation risks, and significant MEV extraction, exacerbating market stress. Vitalik's alternative envisions splitting an asset like 1 ETH into two complementary components: one offering stable/index-like exposure and the other absorbing the opposite risk/reward. Instead of a hard liquidation threshold, a user's exposure to the target asset would gradually and smoothly deviate (following a near-quadratic curve) as the collateral price moves. The system would primarily depend on "slow oracles" for periodic settlement rather than instant price feeds. Key potential benefits include: the elimination of abrupt, forced liquidations; drastically reduced reliance on vulnerable real-time oracles; and inherent resistance to certain MEV exploits centered on liquidation auctions. The article posits that for Ethereum DeFi to maintain its relevance amid competition from faster, cheaper chains, it must compete on sophisticated financial engineering and robustness—not just transaction speed or yields. The core value proposition should shift towards offering users clearer, more manageable risk structures, greater autonomy, and resilience in extreme scenarios, moving DeFi from high-risk experimentation towards becoming reliable financial infrastructure.

marsbit30m ago

Vitalik's Vision for the Next Evolution of On-Chain Finance: How to Reconstruct DeFi with an 'Options Mindset'?

marsbit30m ago

AI Agent Completely Transforms Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New 2026 Agent Paradigm

This article explores how the AI Agent paradigm is fundamentally transforming Web3 gaming, moving from a disruptive force to a core, legitimized element. It begins with the controversy in the competitive baking game Rugpull Bakery, where automated scripts caused fairness issues. Instead of banning them, the developers integrated AI Agents into the official gameplay by providing technical documentation (skill.md, agent.json), marking a shift towards "Agentic Gaming." The piece outlines three primary implementation models for AI Agents in Web3 games by 2026: 1. **Autonomous Competitors & Economic Entities:** AI Agents act as independent players with unique strategies. Examples include TEN Protocol's poker agents, AI Arena's trainable NFT fighters, and Satoshi Strike Force's "Digital Athletes" trained on player data. The Somnia blockchain is highlighted as a dedicated "Agentic L1" infrastructure supporting this model at scale. 2. **Modular Infrastructure & Programmable Environments:** This model, exemplified by EVE Frontier, allows AI Agents to program game world logic itself. Using "Smart Assemblies" (e.g., Smart Turrets, Smart Gates), Agents can modify shared economic and physical rules on-chain, creating dynamic, player/AI-built worlds. The ERC-8183 standard further enables these automated entities to hire other AI services for complex tasks. 3. **Hybrid Companions & Dynamic Adaptation:** Here, AI serves as a collaborative partner. In Parallel Colony, highly autonomous AI Avatars work alongside human players who provide high-level guidance. Illuvium plans to use AI to make NPCs dynamic and responsive, creating personalized, emergent narratives for each player. The conclusion posits that Web3 gaming has reached a "post-human" inflection point. Blockchains' transparency and programmability, combined with new standards and infrastructure like Somnia, make integrating and governing AI Agents not just viable but essential. The future lies in a symbiotic digital order where players transition from manual laborers to commanders and partners of algorithmic intelligence.

marsbit1h ago

AI Agent Completely Transforms Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New 2026 Agent Paradigm

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片