US Clarity Act unlikely to be ‘world-shaking’ for Bitcoin’s price: Brandt

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-19Last updated on 2025-12-19

Abstract

Veteran trader Peter Brandt believes the potential passage of the US Clarity Act is unlikely to significantly impact Bitcoin's price, stating it is not a "world-shaking macro development." While he views the legislation as a positive step for regulatory clarity in the crypto industry, he does not see it as a catalyst that will drive Bitcoin back to its all-time high. Brandt also expressed a bearish outlook, suggesting Bitcoin could fall to $60,000 by Q3 2026. Similarly, Ledn's Chief Investment Officer John Glover noted that the act's potential effects have likely already been "priced in" by the market, expecting any benefits to be delayed rather than immediate. Despite this, both see the legislation as a move toward broader acceptance of cryptocurrencies as investable assets.

Veteran trader Peter Brandt said the potential passage of the US Clarity Act is unlikely to have a significant impact on Bitcoin’s price, after indications that it could pass Congress as soon as January.

“Is it a world-shaking macro development? Nope. Needed for sure, but not something that should redefine value,” Brandt told Cointelegraph on Friday. “Having an asset regulated, particularly an asset for which die-hard investors never wanted to be regulated, is not an earth-shattering event,” he added.

His comments came after White House crypto and AI czar David Sacks said on Thursday, ”We are closer than ever to passing the landmark crypto market structure legislation.”

“We look forward to finishing the job in January,” Sacks said.

Some say that the Clarity Act has already “been priced in”

While Brandt does not see the Clarity Act as a catalyst that will drive Bitcoin (BTC) back to its all-time high of $125,100, he emphasized that the legislation would still be a significant step forward for the wider crypto industry. “The Clarity Act would be positive because it would greatly clarify the regulatory structure for crypto assets,” he said.

Source: David Sacks

Echoing a similar sentiment to Brandt, Ledn’s chief investment officer, John Glover, told Cointelegraph that the potential passing of the Clarity Act has already “been priced into the market.”

“I don’t expect this event to have a significant impact on the markets on day 1,” Glover said, adding that any benefits to price action are likely to be more delayed.

“It is another step toward broad-based acceptance of Bitcoin and ETH as investable assets, so over time I still expect the price trajectory to be up and to the right over time,” Glover said.

Brandt opined that Bitcoin is in a bear market, though said the Clarity Act could mean his “downside bias is moderate.”

Brandt says Bitcoin could fall to $60,000 in 2026

“I believe the charts suggest that Bitcoin could trade down to the $60k level, likely in Q3 of 2026,” he said. That would represent a 31% drop from Bitcoin’s price at the time of publication of $88,000, according to CoinMarketCap.

Related: SEC commissioner says crypto is ‘helping to nudge reassessment’ on privacy

The bill has been top of mind not only for the crypto industry but also for pro-crypto lawmakers.

On Dec. 9, Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis, a member of the US Senate Banking Committee and one of the most prominent congressional proponents for addressing digital asset market structure, said she wants to take the next step in advancing the bill in the coming days.

The senator said the crypto industry “was getting a little concerned” about the progress of the bill, adding that drafts were “changed so much every few days” during bipartisan discussions.

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year power outage?

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to Peter Brandt, what impact will the US Clarity Act have on Bitcoin's price?

APeter Brandt stated that the potential passage of the US Clarity Act is unlikely to have a significant or 'world-shaking' impact on Bitcoin's price.

QWhat did David Sacks say about the progress of the crypto market structure legislation?

ADavid Sacks, the White House crypto and AI czar, said, 'We are closer than ever to passing the landmark crypto market structure legislation' and that they look forward to 'finishing the job in January.'

QWhy does John Glover believe the Clarity Act won't significantly impact markets on day 1?

AJohn Glover believes the potential passing of the Clarity Act has already 'been priced into the market,' so he doesn't expect a significant impact on the first day.

QWhat downside price level for Bitcoin did Peter Brandt predict for 2026?

APeter Brandt opined that the charts suggest Bitcoin could trade down to the $60,000 level, likely in Q3 of 2026.

QWhich US Senator expressed concern about the progress of the Clarity Act bill?

AWyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis, a member of the US Senate Banking Committee, said the crypto industry 'was getting a little concerned' about the bill's progress due to frequent changes during bipartisan discussions.

Related Reads

19 New Decacorns in Half a Year: Why is the Primary Market Chasing 'Certainty'?

In the first half of 2026, China’s primary market saw a notable increase in unicorns, adding 19 new companies each valued over 100 billion RMB, particularly in sectors like embodied AI and large language models (LLMs). Firms such as Galaxy General, Zibian, and ZhiPingFang even surpassed 200 billion RMB valuations within months. Moonshot AI's valuation surged from around $10 billion to $35 billion by July 2026, with a pre-IPO target of $50 billion. This concentration of capital into a few "certain" sectors highlights a market shift. The driving force is not a general abundance of capital but a chase for "certainty"—primarily clearer exit pathways like imminent IPOs. Companies with defined public listing timelines attract intense investment despite higher valuations, as they reduce exit uncertainty for investors. Secondary market valuations of listed peers also serve as new anchors, boosting the perceived value of private companies in similar fields, though this creates dependency on public market sentiment. Another form of certainty comes from the expectation of rising valuations in subsequent funding rounds. The investment logic has shifted in some cases from assessing long-term fundamental value to betting on the next round attracting higher prices. This dynamic is also seen in deep-tech areas like nuclear fusion, where firms like NeoFusion secured a 10.6 billion RMB valuation despite early commercial stages, driven by scarcity and strategic bets. However, this trend signals a risk transfer: technical uncertainties remain but are temporarily masked by valuation inflation. As valuations climb—50 billion to 200 billion or 500 billion RMB—companies face increasing pressure to demonstrate real revenue, profit, and sustainable business models. The danger lies not in the rise of unicorns itself, but if valuations become detached from value creation and rely merely on the expectation of future funding or exits. Ultimately, the surge reflects investors seeking perceived safety in shorter-term exit certainty and transactional momentum, rather than a renewed appetite for risk. The true test will come when the market inevitably refocuses on fundamentals, questioning how many of today’s high valuations are backed by genuine economic value.

marsbit4m ago

19 New Decacorns in Half a Year: Why is the Primary Market Chasing 'Certainty'?

marsbit4m ago

Just Now, Sam Altman Blasts Dario Amodei as 'Anti-Human', Secret Model Exposed the Same Day

Just now, Sam Altman strongly criticized Dario (Amodei, co-founder of Anthropic), denouncing his "doomsday marketing" as "anti-human dictator rhetoric." This came alongside the accidental exposure of OpenAI's next-generation model, codenamed "gpt-nathree," hinting at the imminent release of GPT-6 Astra. The leak occurred when an OpenAI employee's public GitHub commit mentioned the codename. Combined with previous leaks of "gpt-mewfour," it suggests these are iterative checkpoints for OpenAI's upcoming agent model, Astra. Astra is known for multi-agent collaboration and long-duration task handling, having reportedly solved previously unsolved mathematical problems. Meanwhile, two new Anthropic model codenames, "claude-marshmallow-eap" and "claude-melon-eap," were also exposed but are believed to be iterations of the Claude 5 series, not a new flagship. In a wide-ranging podcast interview, Altman admitted he was wrong about the speed of AI-driven disruption, acknowledging societal inertia slows adoption. He fiercely criticized rivals' marketing that simultaneously promises immense benefits (like curing cancer) and warns of existential risk, calling it a dangerous "benevolent dictator" narrative that seeks to concentrate power. He emphasized that people are the ultimate purpose of AI. Altman also revealed OpenAI's unconventional, consensus-defying path: spending four and a half years in the "dark" without a public product before ChatGPT's breakthrough, driven by scaling laws rather than early customer feedback. He concluded that even with superintelligent AI, genuine human connection will remain irreplaceably valuable.

marsbit44m ago

Just Now, Sam Altman Blasts Dario Amodei as 'Anti-Human', Secret Model Exposed the Same Day

marsbit44m ago

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

"Rescuing US Treasuries" Relay: After Bessent's Miss, All Eyes Are on Walsh Last week, US Treasury Secretary Bessent's announcement to at least double long-term Treasury buybacks failed to sustainably lower yields, which quickly rebounded. The market response saw a drop in the dollar alongside surges in gold and Bitcoin, interpreted as a "pressure release valve" for anxiety. The focus now shifts to Fed Chairman Walsh's upcoming Jackson Hole speech. Markets are highly sensitive to his message, seeking clarity on the Fed's policy response to stubborn inflation and worsening fiscal conditions. Analysts warn that a lack of new guidance could disappoint markets and worsen the sell-off in long-dated bonds. Analysts question the scale of Bessent's operations, noting they are too small relative to the overall debt market and do not constitute quantitative easing. A key issue is the Fed's massive holdings of long-term bonds, which distorts the market. With the Fed holding low-yielding short-term bonds that are losing money relative to its policy rate, discussion is growing around a potential Fed-led "Operation Twist." This would involve selling short-term bonds to buy long-term ones, aiming to lower long-end yields without expanding the balance sheet. The upcoming PCE inflation data will set the stage for Walsh's speech. However, the window for action is narrowing amid political pressures. A critical threshold is the 30-year yield at 5%; holding above it could increase stress on the dollar and leveraged sectors. Overall, the article suggests that without coordinated Fed action to anchor inflation expectations, Treasury interventions may ultimately fail, with investors increasingly looking to assets like gold as hedges.

marsbit1h ago

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

marsbit1h ago

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

Hyperliquid’s Compliance Path: From Permissionless to Permissioned HIP-3 Hyperliquid currently blocks U.S. access because its permissionless, on-chain infrastructure conflicts with U.S. market structure laws, which restrict futures trading to registered exchanges, clearinghouses, and brokers. Through its Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), the project is advocating for regulatory modernization, proposing that regulated entities be allowed to build products on HyperCore (its exchange and clearing layer) while fulfilling their compliance obligations. The platform’s modular stack separates roles like a traditional exchange (DCM), clearinghouse (DCO), and broker (FCM), but reconstructs them on-chain with code. This enables permissionless access, self-custody, and 24/7 global trading, but clashes with U.S. rules requiring KYC, specific margin models, and custodial arrangements. To resolve this, HPC is engaging with U.S. regulators (CFTC, SEC) to seek clarity that deploying on-chain software does not itself trigger licensing, and to establish exemptions allowing non-custodial wallets to route users to regulated derivatives. Recent political signals suggest openness to this approach. On the technical side, Hyperliquid Labs has introduced permissioned HIP-3 deployers on testnet. These allow regulated entities to launch markets, perform KYC, and whitelist compliant users. While these create separate order books, whitelisted market makers can bridge liquidity between them, ensuring deep, shared liquidity across the same L1. Features like payload-based “PA” permissions enable DEX-level account controls (e.g., reduce-only orders), mirroring traditional broker authorities. The strategy is not to open the native, permissionless front-end to U.S. users, but to position Hyperliquid as neutral infrastructure that U.S. regulated firms can use while meeting their legal duties. This paves a compliant path for U.S. investor access while preserving the protocol’s core, permissionless nature.

marsbit1h ago

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片