Uniswap founder rejects claims v4 fees reduce LP earnings

cointelegraphPublished on 2026-07-29Last updated on 2026-07-29

Abstract

Uniswap founder Hayden Adams refuted criticism that the newly activated v4 protocol fees reduce liquidity provider (LP) earnings, labeling the claims as "FUD and misunderstanding." He clarified that a 5-basis-point protocol fee in a typical 30-basis-point pool represents about 14% of total swap fees, not a direct cut from LP profits. Adams emphasized that these fees are additive and not deducted from existing LP earnings. The comments followed Uniswap governance's approval to activate protocol fees for selected v4 pools across multiple blockchains. Uniswap remains the largest decentralized exchange by total value locked, with approximately $3.06 billion secured.

Uniswap founder Hayden Adams pushed back against criticism of Uniswap’s newly activated v4 protocol fees, arguing that claims they reduce liquidity providers’ earnings are based on incorrect assumptions.

In an X post on Tuesday, Adams said recent criticism surrounding the protocol fee activation amounted to “FUD and misunderstanding.”

Adams also disputed claims that the protocol was taking 25% of LP profits. Using a 30-basis-point pool as an example, he said a 5-basis-point protocol fee represents about 14% of total swap fees, not a reduction in LP earnings.

The comments came after Uniswap governance approved the activation of protocol fees for selected v4 pools across multiple blockchains. Adams rejected claims that liquidity providers would earn lower fees, saying protocol fees are additive rather than deducted from existing LP fees.

Uniswap is the world’s largest decentralized exchange by total value locked, with about $3.06 billion secured on the protocol, according to DefiLlama.

Related: Spark migrates $150M in stablecoin to Uniswap to advance shared liquidity

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument of Uniswap founder Hayden Adams regarding the v4 protocol fees?

AHayden Adams argues that claims the v4 protocol fees reduce liquidity providers' earnings are based on incorrect assumptions and misunderstanding. He states that the fees are additive, not deducted from existing LP fees.

QHow did Hayden Adams describe the recent criticism of the v4 protocol fee activation?

AHe described the recent criticism as 'FUD and misunderstanding' in an X post on Tuesday.

QWhat example did Adams use to clarify the percentage of the protocol fee, and what was his conclusion?

AHe used a 30-basis-point pool as an example. He stated that a 5-basis-point protocol fee represents about 14% of total swap fees, not a reduction in LP earnings.

QWhat action by Uniswap governance preceded Adams' comments, and what was its scope?

AUniswap governance approved the activation of protocol fees for selected v4 pools across multiple blockchains, which preceded Adams' comments.

QAccording to DefiLlama, what is Uniswap's position among decentralized exchanges by total value locked (TVL)?

AAccording to DefiLlama, Uniswap is the world's largest decentralized exchange by total value locked (TVL), with about $3.06 billion secured on the protocol.

Related Reads

Goldman Sachs: July Smashes Through Crowded Trades, U.S. Stock Bull Market Not Broken but Harder to Navigate

Goldman Sachs: July Sees Crowded Trades Unwound, U.S. Bull Market Intact but Getting Tougher. The U.S. stock market in July did not see an index-level crash, but rather a significant unwinding of speculative positions. While the S&P 500 remained stable—trading within a narrow 3.5% range and staying within 2% of its high—underlying market dynamics were volatile. Heavily crowded trades, particularly in high-momentum tech, AI-linked stocks, and Asian strategies, faced severe pressure and forced deleveraging. Data indicates this was a meaningful cleanse, not a minor adjustment. Global tech exposure saw its largest sell-off in over five years, leverage in Korean equity ETFs plummeted, and Goldman's prime brokerage recorded the largest gross exposure reduction since late 2022. Leverage on momentum factors among fundamental long/short clients fell to the 28th percentile of its one-year range. The AI trade narrative shifted from pure potential to a focus on tangible returns. While Meta failed to show clear AI monetization, Microsoft and Amazon provided evidence that massive capital expenditure is translating into scalable revenue and product growth, preventing a blanket sell-off of the AI sector. The Federal Reserve's more opaque communication style and volatility in long-end Treasury yields have introduced new friction, particularly for rate-sensitive growth and tech stocks. The broader outlook for U.S. equities remains favorable, supported by a strong economy, robust earnings, and substantial AI capital expenditure. However, risk/reward is no longer cheap, and the market's upward elasticity has weakened. The Nasdaq 100's trajectory—up 12% year-to-date despite significant pullbacks—illustrates that the bull trend persists but the path is becoming more difficult. The key lesson from July is that the market no longer rewards crowded, highly leveraged trades, requiring more disciplined and liquid portfolio approaches.

marsbit3h ago

Goldman Sachs: July Smashes Through Crowded Trades, U.S. Stock Bull Market Not Broken but Harder to Navigate

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片