The Secret Behind BTC's Rise: MSTR's New Flywheel - STRC

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-17Last updated on 2026-03-17

Abstract

BTC's recent strength amid market volatility may be linked to the high trading volume of MicroStrategy’s (MSTR) preferred stock, STRC, which reached up to $750 million in daily volume last week. This activity could have generated an estimated $700 million in net Bitcoin buying pressure. STRC functions as a perpetual, equity-like instrument with a fixed 11.5% annual dividend, designed to anchor around $100 through mechanisms like dynamic dividend adjustments, ATM (at-the-market) offerings, and a $101 redemption option. When STRC trades at or above $100, MSTR issues new shares via its ATM program, using the proceeds to buy Bitcoin. Due to MSTR’s target leverage ratio of 33%, each dollar raised through STRC issuance results in approximately $3 worth of Bitcoin purchases. Key constraints include the requirement that STRC trades near $100 to trigger issuance, MSTR’s mNAV (market net asset value) must remain above 1x to avoid equity dilution, and the strategy fundamentally depends on long-term Bitcoin appreciation. If Bitcoin enters a prolonged bear market, MSTR could face challenges covering dividends, potentially forcing BTC sales. In summary, STRC acts as a structured financial tool that converts market demand into Bitcoin acquisitions, reinforcing MicroStrategy’s role as a Bitcoin-focused financial company rather than a simple holding entity.

Author: CJ_Blockchain

BTC has maintained absolute strength in a macro-fluctuating market, and the active trading of STRC may be one of the reasons for its strength.

Last week, the average daily trading volume of MSTR's preferred stock STRC exceeded $300 million, with a single-day peak reaching $750 million. It has almost become the most liquid preferred stock in the U.S. stock market.

According to STRC's mechanism, last week's trading volume may have brought about approximately $700 million in potential net buying pressure for BTC.

This article aims to introduce the basic situation of STRC, its operational mechanism, why it brings buying pressure to BTC, and potential risks.

1. What is STRC Preferred Stock?

From a financial structure perspective, STRC is a "debt-like" equity instrument issued to external investors. It decomposes Bitcoin's extreme volatility into a credit product with fixed cash flow attributes through layering.

Four Core Features of STRC:

  • Short-Term High-Yield Credit: Positioned as a short-term high-yield instrument, it offers competitive monthly dividends (current annualized interest rate of 11.5%).

  • Perpetual Structure: No fixed maturity date, the company avoids the "principal repayment" pressure of traditional bonds, making it permanent capital.

  • Capital Structure Priority: Higher priority in the liquidation order than common stock ($MSTR), providing a safety cushion for debt-oriented investors.

  • No Default Risk: Legally classified as equity, dividend payments are not mandatory, avoiding bankruptcy triggers due to temporary cash flow shortages.

MSTR vs. STRC

2. Price Anchoring Mechanism: STRC's Anchoring and Liquidity Absorption

Strategy Company uses a series of financial leverages to lock STRC's market price around $100, thereby establishing a stable financing window.

Key Price Control Tools:

  • Dynamic Dividend Adjustment: Strategy uses reflexive interest rate adjustments. If STRC's price falls below $99, the company increases dividends (by 25-50 bps) to stimulate buying; conversely, it lowers rates to curb excessive demand, bringing yields back to market equilibrium.

  • ATM (At-The-Market Offering): When STRC's price > $100, Strategy issues additional STRC at $100 and sells it on the market, absorbing surplus demand while converting excess funds into BTC purchasing power.

  • Redemption Clause: The company reserves the right to redeem STRC at $101. This clause psychologically and financially limits investors' motivation to buy at a premium, ensuring the price does not deviate from par value.

  • Tax Efficiency Optimization: STRC dividends have a "return of capital" nature, allowing holders to enjoy tax deferral benefits. This structural design reduces investors' selling frequency and enhances the stability of the $100 price anchor.

Strategy is committed to anchoring STRC's price within the narrow range of $99-$100, using this as the cornerstone for large-scale conversion into Bitcoin purchasing power.

3. Structured BTC Appreciation Flywheel: Converting Trading Volume into Purchasing Power

When the STRC price fluctuates between 99-101, trading volume is converted into BTC purchasing power as follows:

  • Issuing STRC to Meet Excess Demand: When the STRC price reaches $100 (par value), the company issues and sells new shares through the STRC ATM program to meet "excess demand" beyond the current market cap. For example, if STRC's trading volume at $100 is $100 million on a given day, and assuming 30% corresponds to new share issuance, the company sells $30 million worth of STRC and immediately buys $30 million worth of BTC.

  • Balancing Leverage Ratio: Issuing more STRC effectively increases the company's debt. MSTR's current target leverage ratio is around 33%, meaning for every $1 increase in debt, the treasury must hold an additional $3 in BTC. Therefore, with a $30 million debt increase in the above scenario, Strategy needs to add an additional $60 million in BTC.

  • Issuing Common Stock MSTR to Fill the Gap: To acquire this additional $60 million in BTC and maintain stable leverage, the company uses the ATM on its common stock MSTR, issuing and selling $60 million worth of new MSTR shares, then using the proceeds to buy $60 million worth of BTC.

Conclusion: According to this mechanism, every $1 of STRC issued roughly translates to an increase of $3 in BTC in the treasury. Therefore, a daily STRC trading volume of $100 million at par value not only generates $30 million in new STRC but ultimately leads the company to purchase up to $90 million worth of BTC.

Of course, the core factors here are the time and volume STRC traded above $100 during the week; the 30% figure is an assumption for ease of understanding. The actual figure depends on the announcement MSTR releases next week.

This flywheel mechanism cannot spin forever; there are currently three core constraints:

  • STRC Price Must Reach $100: MSTR is only a seller of STRC at $100. If STRC's price is strictly below $100, new share issuance is not triggered, and no new BTC purchasing power is generated.

  • Common Stock mNAV Must Be Greater Than 1x: Strategy's core long-term goal is to increase the Bitcoin-per-share ratio. Selling common stock MSTR to buy BTC increases bps only if MSTR's mNAV is above 1x; if mNAV falls below 1, selling MSTR for BTC would cause dilution, and the company would avoid using the ATM for MSTR. If there is extreme demand for STRC but mNAV is below 1x, the company can only suppress excess demand by lowering STRC's dividend rate.

  • BTC's Long-Term Price Performance (The Fundamental Risk): The entire strategy relies on the long-term expectation of BTC's price appreciation (e.g., annual returns above 20%). If BTC enters a prolonged bear market, STRC could trade below par and sustain a discount, and MSTR's mNAV could fall below 1, cutting off the path to issuing common stock to pay dividends. In such an extreme scenario, Strategy could only rely on its existing dollar reserves (currently sufficient for about 28 months) to pay dividends; if the dollar reserves are depleted, the company would be forced to gradually sell its BTC holdings.

4. Conclusion

Saylor emphasized last year that Strategy is not simply a "DAT" company but a structured finance company backed by Bitcoin. He is not just a simple BTC believer but a financial genius.

Every time BTC falls, Strategy and Saylor himself face the most criticism. Some worry about Strategy blowing up, others worry that Strategy is buying too much, affecting BTC's decentralization.

But Saylor doesn't care; he just wants to buy BTC by any means necessary.

Related Questions

QWhat is STRC and what are its key features?

ASTRC is a type of 'debt-like' equity instrument issued by MicroStrategy. Its four core features are: 1) Short-term high-yield credit with a competitive monthly dividend (currently 11.5% annualized); 2) A perpetual structure with no fixed maturity date; 3) Priority in the capital structure over common stock ($MSTR); 4) No default risk, as it is legally equity and dividend payments are not mandatory.

QHow does MicroStrategy anchor the price of STRC around $100?

AMicroStrategy uses several key tools to anchor STRC price: 1) Dynamic dividend adjustment: It raises the dividend if the price falls below $99 and lowers it to suppress excessive demand above that level. 2) ATM (At-The-Market) offering: It issues and sells new STRC shares at $100 when the price is above that to absorb surplus demand. 3) Redemption clause: The company reserves the right to redeem STRC at $101, limiting investor incentive to buy at a premium. 4) Tax efficiency: The dividend's 'return of capital' nature provides tax deferral, reducing selling frequency.

QAccording to the article, how does STRC trading volume translate into buying pressure for Bitcoin?

AThe mechanism converts STRC trading volume into BTC buying pressure in three steps: 1) When STRC trades at $100, MicroStrategy issues new shares via its offering to meet excess demand. 2) To maintain its target leverage ratio of ~33%, for every $1 of new STRC (liability) issued, the company must hold $3 of BTC in its treasury. 3) To acquire the additional BTC needed to maintain this ratio, the company issues and sells new common stock ($MSTR) and uses the proceeds to buy more BTC. The article estimates that $1 of STRC issuance can ultimately lead to ~$3 of BTC purchases.

QWhat are the three main constraints on this 'flywheel' mechanism described in the article?

AThe three core constraints are: 1) The STRC price must be at or above $100 for the ATM issuance to be activated. 2) The common stock's mNAV (market Net Asset Value) must be greater than 1x for issuing $MSTR to be accretive; if it falls below 1, the company would avoid selling shares. 3) The long-term price performance of Bitcoin is the fundamental risk. A prolonged bear market could cause STRC to trade at a discount and the mNAV to fall below 1, potentially forcing the company to use its dollar reserves and eventually sell BTC to pay dividends.

QHow does the article characterize MicroStrategy's CEO, Michael Saylor, and his strategy?

AThe article characterizes Michael Saylor not merely as a Bitcoin believer but as a 'financial genius.' It states that his company, MicroStrategy, is not a simple 'DAT' (Digital Asset Treasury) company but a structured finance company built around Bitcoin. The strategy involves using financial engineering (through instruments like STRC) to continuously acquire more BTC, a goal he pursues relentlessly despite criticism during market downturns or concerns about Bitcoin's decentralization.

Related Reads

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit20m ago

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit20m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit28m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit28m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit36m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit36m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit39m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit39m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit42m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit42m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片