Tether's Acquisition of Juventus: The European Class Struggle Behind It

比推Published on 2025-12-15Last updated on 2025-12-15

Abstract

Tether, the world's largest stablecoin issuer, has made a cash offer to acquire a controlling 65.4% stake in the historic Italian football club Juventus from the Exor Group, controlled by the Agnelli family. The offer, representing a 20.74% premium, was swiftly rejected. Tether's CEO, Italian-born Paolo Ardoino, a lifelong Juventus supporter, sees this as an attempt to save his childhood club, which is mired in financial crisis following years of losses and a major accounting scandal. However, the old-money Agnelli family, which has owned the club for over a century, views the offer from the crypto giant with suspicion and as a threat to its legacy and traditional industrial prestige. The clash represents a broader cultural and economic conflict between established European "old money" and the emerging wealth of the "new money" crypto industry. Despite the club's financial struggles, Exor has so far refused to sell, prioritizing heritage and control over a significant capital injection.

Author: Sleepy.txt

Original Title: Crypto Printing Press Wants to Buy Juventus: The Offensive and Defensive Battle Between Europe's Old and New Money


Tether, the world's largest stablecoin giant, is preparing to buy Italy's most iconic football powerhouse, Juventus.

On December 12, Tether submitted a takeover offer to the Italian Stock Exchange, proposing to acquire the 65.4% stake in Juventus held by the Exor Group at a price of 2.66 euros per share, a 20.74% premium over the market price. If the deal is successful, Tether will also inject an additional 1 billion euros into the club.

This is an all-cash offer. No bets, no conditions, just a simple "cash on delivery." In the world of capital, this is the most brutal form of sincerity, and Tether gave the Exor Group only 10-day window to consider.

However, the Exor Group, controlled by the Agnelli family, quickly issued a statement: "There are currently no negotiations regarding the sale of Juventus shares."

The implication is clear: Not for sale.

Within 24 hours, renowned Italian journalist Eleonora Trotta reported that Tether was preparing to double its offer, directly valuing Juventus at 2 billion euros.

At the center of the storm is a man named Paolo Ardoino.

In 1984, Paolo was born in an ordinary small town in Italy. His parents were civil servants, and his grandparents tended a traditional olive grove. It was a typical Italian childhood; the black-and-white striped jerseys, the cheers at the Allianz Stadium in Turin, and the glory of the Agnelli family formed the spiritual totems of his growing memories.

Thirty-two years later, the boy from under the olive trees grew into the Caesar of the cryptocurrency world, managing Tether, a super printing press with an annual profit of $13 billion. Now he has returned home in glory, trying to buy the dream of his childhood and give back to the black-and-white faith flowing in his blood.

But reality taught sentimentality a lesson.

When Paolo enthusiastically knocked on the door of Juventus, he was greeted not with flowers or applause. What awaited him was nine months of exclusion and humiliation from the old world.

The 9 Months of Exclusion

The honeymoon period began in a way that was almost like unrequited love.

In February 2025, Tether announced it had acquired an 8.2% stake in Juventus, becoming the second-largest shareholder after the Exor Group. In the official statement, Paolo shed his business acumen and rarely showed his soft side: "For me, Juventus has always been a part of my life."

Paolo thought it was a mutually beneficial deal: I have money, you need money, let's make a deal. However, in Italy, some doors cannot be opened with money alone.

Two months later, Juventus announced a capital increase plan of up to 110 million euros. At this critical moment when blood transfusion was urgently needed, Paolo, as the second-largest shareholder, was deliberately "forgotten." No phone calls, no emails, not a word of explanation. The Exor Group didn't even bother to send him a consolation prize.

Paolo typed a message full of grievance on social media: "We hoped to increase our stake in Juventus through a possible capital increase by the club, but this wish was ignored."

Paolo had probably never felt so wronged in his life. A financial titan managing an annual profit of $13 billion had to use social media to "remind" Juventus: I want to participate in the capital increase, I want to invest more, but I'm being ignored.

Some sympathized with Paolo, believing he was a true Juventus fan; others questioned his motives, thinking he just wanted to use Juventus to whitewash Tether's image.

Whether the outside world sympathized or doubted, in the eyes of the Agnelli family, Paolo was still an "outsider." The relationship between the two sides was not one of cooperation from the beginning but of "defense."

Since sentimentality couldn't buy respect, he would use money instead.

From April to October, Tether increased its stake from 8.2% to 10.7% through the open market. According to Italian law, a stake exceeding 10% grants the right to nominate board members.

On November 7, Turin, Juventus Annual General Meeting. The atmosphere became treacherous due to Tether's disruption.

Tether nominated Francesco Garino as a board candidate. He is a well-known local doctor from Turin and a lifelong Juventus fan. Paolo tried to tell everyone: We are not barbarians; we are sons of Turin, bound by blood.

The shrewd Exor Group counterattacked with a trump card: Giorgio Chiellini. This legendary captain, who played for Juventus for 17 years and won 9 Serie A titles, was pushed to the forefront.

This was Exor's strategy: use a club legend to fight capital, use sentiment to fight money.

In the end, Tether barely won a seat on the board. But in a board where the Agnelli family holds absolute control, one seat means you can listen, you can suggest, but you cannot touch the steering wheel.

John Elkann, the fifth-generation leader of the Agnelli family, concluded: "We are proud to have been shareholders of Juventus for over a century. We have no intention of selling our shares, but we are open to constructive ideas from all stakeholders."

To put it more bluntly: This is not just business; this is our family's territory. You can come in for tea, but don't expect to be the master here.

The Arrogance and Prejudice of Old Money

John's words carry the weight of 102 years of family pride and arrogance.

On July 24, 1923, 31-year-old Edoardo Agnelli took up the mantle of President of Juventus. From that day on, the fate of the Agnelli family and Juventus were tightly bound together. The family's Fiat auto empire was, for most of the 20th century, Italy's largest private enterprise, employing countless workers and supporting millions of families.

And Juventus is another symbol of this family's power. With 36 Serie A titles, 2 Champions League titles, and 14 Coppa Italia titles, Juventus is the most successful club in Italian football history and a source of national pride for Italians.

However, the history of the Agnelli family's inheritance is filled with bloodshed and fractures.

In 2000, Agnelli family heir Edoardo Agnelli jumped from a viaduct, ending his battle with depression. Three years later, family patriarch Gianni Agnelli passed away. The baton of power had to be passed to his grandson, John Elkann.

John was born in New York and grew up in Paris. He speaks English, French, and Italian, but his Italian has a noticeable foreign accent. In the eyes of many old-school Italians, he is just a proxy who gained power through bloodline.

It took John a full 20 years to prove himself worthy of the Agnelli name.

He restructured Fiat, swallowed Chrysler, and created Stellantis, the world's fourth-largest automotive group; he took Ferrari to the capital markets, doubling its market value; he bought The Economist, extending the Agnelli family's influence from Italy to the globe.

Unfortunately, the cracks within the family are becoming public. In September 2025, John Elkann's mother, Margherita, submitted a "will" from 1998 to the Turin court, claiming that the inheritance left to her by her father, Gianni, had been misappropriated by John. Mother and son faced off in court, a huge scandal in Italy, where family honor is highly valued.

In this context, selling Juventus would be equivalent to admitting the end of the family's glory, admitting that he is inferior to his ancestors.

To keep Juventus, John is frantically selling off other family assets.

Just days before Tether made its offer, the Exor Group was busy selling its GEDI media group to the Greek media group Antenna Group for 140 million euros. GEDI owns two major media outlets, La Repubblica and La Stampa, whose status in Italy is no less than that of Juventus in Italian football.

The news caused an uproar in Italy. The Italian government even invoked the "Golden Power" law, requiring Exor to protect jobs and editorial independence during the sale.

Newspapers losing money are liabilities and must be cut; Juventus losing money is a totem and must be kept.

This choice exposes the plight of the old aristocracy. They can no longer maintain their former empire and can only strive to retain the one that best represents the family's glory.

Therefore, despite Paolo's offer carrying a high 20% market premium, John Elkann still sees it as a threat.

In the value system of European old money, the quality of wealth has a hierarchy.

Every penny of the Agnelli family is steeped in the smell of engine oil. It is an industrial monument forged from steel, rubber, the roar of engines, and the sweat of millions of workers. This kind of wealth is visible and tangible; it represents order, control, and a social contract spanning a century.

Paolo's money, however, comes from cryptocurrency, from an industry that has grown wildly and controversially over the past decade.

Precedents are still fresh.

Just a few years ago, the blockchain company DigitalBit signed sponsorship deals worth 85 million euros with two Serie A giants, Inter Milan and Roma. But DigitalBits defaulted on its payments due to a broken capital chain, forcing both clubs to terminate the contracts, leaving a mess behind.

Not to mention the chain of collapses in the cryptocurrency industry in 2022. Back then, Luna's logo was plastered on the Washington Nationals' stadium, and FTX's name still adorned the Miami Heat's arena. In the eyes of the Agnelli family, the cryptocurrency industry is full of speculation and bubbles.

In the Agnelli family's eyes, Paolo will always be an "outsider." Not because of his origins, but because of his money.

A Totem in Need of Saving

But the problem is, Juventus really needs money.

Today's Juventus is deeply mired in trouble, all stemming from July 10, 2018, when Juventus announced the signing of 33-year-old Cristiano Ronaldo. A 100 million euro transfer fee, a net annual salary of 30 million euros, for a four-year contract.

This was the largest transfer in Serie A history and the highest salary in Serie A history. Then-Juventus President Andrea Agnelli, the fourth-generation leader of the Agnelli family, said excitedly at the shareholders' meeting: "This is the most important signing in Juventus history. We will win the Champions League with Ronaldo."

The city of Turin was ecstatic. Fans flocked to the Juventus store to buy jerseys with Ronaldo's name. In just 24 hours after the signing, the club sold over 520,000 jerseys, setting a record in football history. Everyone believed Ronaldo would lead Juventus to the top of Europe.

But Juventus did not win the Champions League. In 2019, they were eliminated by Ajax; in 2020, by Lyon; in 2021, by Porto. In August 2021, Ronaldo suddenly left the team and moved to Manchester United. Juventus not only failed to recoup their investment but fell into deeper financial quagmire.

Accountants later calculated the total cost: including transfer fees, salaries, and taxes, signing Ronaldo cost a total of 340 million euros. In his three years at Juventus, he scored 101 goals, with each goal costing an average of 2.8 million euros.

For a club of Juventus's size, the Champions League is not just an honor; it's a cash flow switch: broadcasting revenue, matchday income, bonus clauses in sponsorship deals—many are tied to the Champions League. Once they lose the Champions League, the books immediately thin, and the team is forced to use accounting methods to fill the gap.

Juventus sold Miralem Pjanić to Spanish giants Barcelona for 60 million euros while buying Arthur from Barcelona for 72 million euros. Both transactions were officially claimed to be unrelated, but everyone knew it was a carefully designed swap. Juventus only needed to pay a 12 million euro cash difference but could record tens of millions of euros in "capital gains" on the books.

This kind of accounting is not uncommon in football, but Juventus overdid it.

The prosecutor's investigation found that over three years, the club had inflated profits by 282 million euros through 42 similar suspicious transactions. After the scandal was exposed, the entire board, including President Andrea Agnelli, resigned collectively.

What followed were punishments for the team: deducted league points, exclusion from the Champions League, long-term bans for executives. This led to an even more terrible vicious cycle: poor team performance led to sharp revenue declines, which led to an inability to sign new talent, which led to worse performance.

Starting with a loss of 39.6 million euros in the 2018-19 season, Juventus's financial situation continued to deteriorate. By the 2022-23 season, the loss had reached 123.7 million euros. From the peak of nine consecutive Serie A titles to years of huge losses, in November 2025, the Exor Group had to inject nearly 100 million euros into Juventus again.

This was the third time in two years that the Exor Group had to bail out Juventus. The Exor Group also owns assets such as Ferrari, the Stellantis automotive group, and The Economist magazine. Juventus's continuous losses are eroding the group's overall profits. In the 2024 financial report, the Exor Group's net profit fell by 12%. Analysts pointed out that Juventus has become a drag on the group's performance.

John Elkann is in a dilemma, unsure how to decide.

And Paolo, with his $13 billion in annual profits, is knocking on the door. He has money, he has patience, he has love for Juventus.

This should have been a perfect deal, if not for the mountain called "class" standing in between.

The Dream Under the Olive Trees

Paolo's knocking received no response, so he made his choice.

On December 12, Paolo bypassed all private roundtable discussions and made the offer public directly through the Italian Stock Exchange. Paolo backed John Elkann into a corner, forcing him to answer this question in front of all of Italy: Do you want money, or do you want family face?

The news caused Juventus's stock price to soar, as the market expressed its desire for "new money." Both La Gazzetta dello Sport and Tuttosport reported it on their front pages. The entire Apennine Peninsula is waiting for the Agnelli family's decision.

The Agnelli family's refusal was expected, yet unreasonable.

Expected, because the Agnelli family's pride does not allow them to bow to new money. Unreasonable, because given their current financial situation, rejecting such a huge sum requires an almost tragic stubbornness.

For Paolo, he wants to use the money he earned to save the idol of his childhood. Companies ultimately have a nationality. Although Tether is a digitally nomadic enterprise with global operations, its CEO is Italian, and its heart is in Italy.

From the Agnelli family's perspective, what they are guarding is not just a club but 102 years of family glory and a symbol of Italy's industrial era.

This is no longer a game of business logic; it is a collision of two beliefs.

In John Elkann's eyes, that bronze door must remain closed because outside stands a speculator trying to whitewash his identity; but in Paolo's eyes, that door should be opened because outside stands a child of Italian blood who can save this team.

However, the times are not on the side of the old aristocracy.

In the same week that Exor rejected Tether, Premier League champions Manchester City announced a renewal of their partnership with the crypto trading platform OKX, with the chest advertisement worth over 100 million. European giants like Paris Saint-Germain, Barcelona, and AC Milan have already established deep cooperation with crypto companies. In Asia, South Korea's K League and Japan's J League have also begun accepting cryptocurrency sponsorships.

New money entering traditional industries controlled by old money is no longer a question of "if" but "in what way." Football is just one battlefield. In the art auction field, Sotheby's and Christie's have begun accepting cryptocurrency payments; in real estate, luxury home transactions in cities like Dubai and Miami can already be completed with Bitcoin. Similar conflicts are playing out all over the world.

Paolo's charge, whether successful or not, is testing the boundaries of this era: When a generation creates huge wealth in new ways, do they deserve a seat at the old world's table controlled by old money?

At the end of the story, the picture freezes on that olive grove in the suburbs.

Thirty-two years ago, a dark-haired boy sat there, accompanied by the sounds of his grandparents working, cheering at the black-and-white figures on the TV. He would never have imagined that one day he would stand outside that door, waiting for an answer.

That tightly closed bronze door remains cold and majestic. Behind it lies a century of Agnelli family glory and the last afterglow of the old industrial era.

It has not opened for new money now, but this time, the person knocking will not back down. Because he knows that pushing this door open is only a matter of time.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7595816

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason behind the Agnelli family's resistance to Tether's acquisition of Juventus?

AThe Agnelli family views Juventus as a century-old symbol of their industrial legacy and family honor, and they are reluctant to sell to a cryptocurrency company, which they perceive as 'new money' with a controversial and speculative background, threatening their traditional values and control.

QHow did Tether initially attempt to increase its stake in Juventus before the public takeover bid?

ATether first acquired 8.2% of Juventus shares in February 2025, becoming the second-largest shareholder. They then increased their stake to 10.7% through open market purchases from April to October 2025, which allowed them to nominate a board member under Italian law.

QWhat financial challenges is Juventus currently facing that make Tether's offer attractive?

AJuventus is struggling with massive financial losses, reaching €123.7 million in the 2022-23 season, due to failed investments like the signing of Cristiano Ronaldo, accounting scandals, penalties from authorities, and exclusion from Champions League revenue, forcing Exor to repeatedly inject capital.

QWho is Paolo Ardoino and what is his personal connection to Juventus?

APaolo Ardoino is the CEO of Tether, born in Italy, and a lifelong Juventus fan. He grew up idolizing the club and sees the acquisition as a way to save his childhood team, reflecting a personal passion beyond business interests.

QWhat broader trend does the Tether-Juventus situation represent in global business?

AIt symbolizes the clash between 'old money' from traditional industries and 'new money' from disruptive sectors like cryptocurrency, testing whether wealth generated through new avenues can gain acceptance in established, legacy-controlled industries such as sports, real estate, and art.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit30m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit30m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit40m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit40m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片