Strategy Sells BTC at Loss, Trump Media Cuts Crypto Business, Grayscale Withdraws Altcoin ETFs: Crypto Market Experiences Sharp Retreat Within a Week

marsbitPublished on 2026-08-11Last updated on 2026-08-11

Abstract

In a single week, three key players in the crypto world pulled back simultaneously, signaling a market-wide retreat. MicroStrategy sold 1,690 BTC at a loss to repurchase its discounted preferred shares. Trump Media reported a quarterly net loss of $238.1 million, largely due to a $190.4 million crypto asset impairment, and announced a scaling back of its crypto ambitions. Grayscale withdrew its filings for spot ETFs tied to Cardano (ADA), Polkadot (DOT), and Hedera (HBAR) within minutes. Individually, these are company updates; together, they point to a sharp ebb tide in crypto. However, in this industry, such contractions are not an end but a prelude. Unlike traditional markets, crypto lacks institutional buffers. Its cleansing happens violently through price crashes and leverage implosions, which are painful but necessary to purge weak hands—speculators, over-leveraged entities, and undisciplined corporate buyers—and transfer their holdings to stronger ones. Previous cycles washed out retail and projects, laying groundwork for DeFi and institutional products like spot Bitcoin ETFs. The current phase targets corporate and institutional excess. MicroStrategy's sale shows even "forever holders" face balance sheet realities. Trump Media's retreat highlights the perils of undisciplined corporate treasury management. Grayscale's product pruning reflects a cooling institutional appetite for altcoins beyond BTC and ETH. This painful process creates a cleaner market structure. It...

Author: Xiaobing

Within a week, three different players in the crypto world simultaneously took a step back: Strategy sold 1,690 BTC at an average price below cost, using all proceeds to repurchase its own preferred shares trading below par value. Trump Media released its quarterly report, revealing a net loss of $238.1 million, of which $190.4 million stemmed from crypto asset impairment, with management announcing a scaling back of crypto operations. Grayscale withdrew registration applications for three spot ETFs (ADA, DOT, and HBAR) in just 190 seconds.

Looked at separately, they are just three pieces of company news. Together, they tell the same story: Crypto is experiencing a sharp retreat.

However, in this industry, retreat is never the final chapter; it's actually the prelude to the next cycle. As Brother Feng says, this is a good thing.

In One Week, Three Different Players Are Retreating

The flag-bearer loosens its grip first.

Strategy sold Bitcoin for two consecutive weeks. In the most recent week, it sold 1,690 BTC at approximately $64,262, raising $108.6 million, all used to repurchase STRZC preferred shares. Its average cost basis is around $75,385. Based on the current price of about $63,900, its total holdings of 840,000 BTC are roughly 15% underwater.

The speculator also directly admits defeat.

In the summer of 2025, with BTC near its all-time high, Trump Media purchased approximately 9,500 Bitcoins at an average price of about $108,519, with a total investment exceeding $1.1 billion. In less than a year, the fair value of its holdings has shrunk to $557.1 million, a gap close to $500 million. Revenue for the same quarter was only $1.7 million. A more direct signal is that management and Crypto.com canceled their plan to jointly list a CRO holding company. The CEO stated on the earnings call about "scaling back certain crypto and online entertainment expansions to refocus on social media," indicating crypto has shifted from strategic expansion to a side business needing damage control.

Institutions are quietly pulling back their battle lines.

On August 7th, Grayscale withdrew registration applications for three spot ETFs (Cardano, Hedera, Polkadot) in 190 seconds. The filing explicitly noted "the product has not been declared effective and no securities have been sold," indicating a voluntary withdrawal. The timing was also subtle: Cardano was just two days away from obtaining listing eligibility when Grayscale stepped back, leaving the spot for others.

The Crypto Industry Needs a Purge

Faced with a screen full of bad news, most people easily conclude "crypto is finished." By traditional industry standards, that would indeed be the case.

Traditional industries fear purges because they imply lost capacity and severe damage, with recovery relying on time to slowly heal. The crypto industry lacks this buffer—no central bank backstop, no bankruptcy reorganization. All purges are violently completed in an extremely short time through price crashes and leverage implosions. Violent, yet thorough.

The crypto market has a fundamental difference from traditional asset markets: It itself needs to periodically undergo violent purges to optimize its holder structure and create conditions for the next upswing. The prerequisite for every bull market is the previous cycle's 'heroes' being thoroughly washed out as sacrificial lambs.

The bursting of the 2018 ICO bubble cleared out thousands of worthless tokens and the speculative capital behind them, leaving behind Ethereum and DeFi infrastructure.

The 2022 collapse of FTX and TerraUSD (LUNA) sent highly leveraged lending and opaque centralized exchanges to their graves, forcing a wave of on-chain transparency and compliance, indirectly catalyzing the approval of spot BTC ETFs in 2024.

The purge happening in 2026 is targeting different players.

The previous two cycles washed out retail investors and project teams; this cycle is starting to wash out corporate-level buyers.

Strategy selling at a loss illustrates one thing: even for those who profess to "hold forever," when the capital structure has problems, they must face reality. Trump Media, carrying the Trump name, may seem imposing, but corporate allocations made without investment discipline become liabilities in a bear market.

Grayscale pruning its product line shows institutional enthusiasm for altcoins is undergoing a sifting process. Tokens outside of BTC and ETH need more than just an ETF application form to gain recognition from traditional finance.

These purges sound painful but are necessary for the industry's long-term health.

This industry's supply is coded and fixed, while demand relies entirely on incremental capital. And incremental capital cares about one thing: Is the holder structure clean? If underwater positions and leveraged positions aren't cleared out, why would new money come in to take over? Therefore, crypto needs a proper purge more than any other asset class. Only after a thorough purge can money for the next cycle flow in.

Only After a Thorough Purge Can a Bull Market Enter

The signals of this purge cycle are more subtle and complex than before.

mNAV falling below 1 means the perpetual motion machine of "issue shares to buy crypto, push up the share price with crypto price, then issue more shares" has stalled. The market is no longer paying for narratives, only for real assets. Even Strategy has started selling crypto to repurchase discounted preferred shares and bulked up its dollar reserves to $4.65 billion. The logic of capital allocation has returned: instead of blindly accumulating crypto, it's better to clean up the balance sheet first. A market that starts counting cash flow is far healthier than one that only chants "hold forever." Grayscale choosing to withdraw even as Cardano's eligibility was imminent is akin to admitting the story for marginal altcoins is over. The bubble is being squeezed to the edges, allowing core assets to solidify.

More crucial is the flow of holdings. The leveraged positions trapped at highs, the treasuries surviving on premiums, and the speculators looking to ride a concept and run—these 'weak hands' will create selling pressure at every price rebound as long as they hold the tokens. Today's underwater positions at Strategy, Trump Media's loss-cutting, and the lack of interest in altcoin ETFs are essentially about holdings moving from weak hands to strong hands. This process is painful but absolutely necessary.

The retreat washes away the foam and the weak hands. What remains is a cleaner holder structure, more pragmatic institutional participants, and stricter product standards.

Last cycle, the crypto industry built spot ETFs on the ruins of FTX. This cycle, upon the initial lessons from the corporate crypto-hoarding wave, what will it build?

The answer is still on the way, and it's something to look forward to.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what are the three key signals indicating a sharp pullback in the crypto market within a week?

AThe three signals are: 1) MicroStrategy selling Bitcoin at a loss to repurchase its own preferred stock; 2) Trump Media reporting significant losses from crypto asset impairments and scaling back its crypto business; and 3) Grayscale withdrawing applications for ADA, DOT, and HBAR spot ETFs.

QWhy does the article suggest that a 'clearing-out' (出清) phase is necessary for the crypto industry?

AThe article suggests that the crypto market, unlike traditional markets, requires periodic, violent clearing-out phases. This process forcibly removes weak hands (like over-leveraged players, speculative capital, and poorly managed corporate treasuries), optimizes the token distribution structure, and creates the conditions for the next bull market by paving the way for new capital to enter a cleaner market.

QWhat specific example does the article use to show that 'weak hands' are being cleared out in the current cycle?

AThe article uses MicroStrategy selling Bitcoin at a loss (below its average cost) and Trump Media recognizing massive impairments on its Bitcoin holdings as key examples. These actions demonstrate that even prominent corporate holders are being forced to face reality and liquidate positions, transferring tokens from weak to strong hands.

QWhat is the fundamental difference between the crypto market and traditional asset markets regarding market cycles, as explained in the article?

AThe fundamental difference is that the crypto market lacks the buffers (like central bank support or structured bankruptcy reorganization) found in traditional markets. Therefore, its clearing-out phases are achieved rapidly and violently through price crashes and leverage explosions. This harsh process is necessary to completely reset the market for the next cycle.

QWhat long-term positive outcome does the article associate with the current market pullback and clearing phase?

AThe article posits that the pullback, while painful, will leave behind a healthier market foundation. This includes a cleaner token supply structure (with fewer weak hands), more pragmatic institutional participants, and stricter product standards. It draws a parallel to the previous cycle where the industry built Bitcoin spot ETFs on the ruins of the FTX collapse, suggesting this cycle's lessons will pave the way for the next phase of institutional infrastructure.

Related Reads

Wall Street Morning Report: Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Falls Nearly 3%, Nvidia's 'Circular Financing' Concerns Trigger Tech Stock Correction, Optical Communication and Chip Stocks Plunge

Wall Street Morning Report: The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell nearly 3%, and concerns over Nvidia's "revolving financing" sparked a tech stock pullback, with optical communications and chip stocks declining sharply. U.S. stocks retreated from record highs on Monday amid geopolitical tensions and AI financing doubts. The Dow fell 0.11%, the Nasdaq 0.32%, and the S&P 500 was nearly flat. Hopes for reopening the Strait of Hormuz dimmed after Trump demanded war reparations from Iran, pushing Brent crude above $87 and WTI above $82. Spot gold broke above $4400/oz. Treasury yields rose, with the market pricing in a ~54% chance of a September Fed hike. The semiconductor and AI infrastructure sectors were hit hard. The Philly Semiconductor Index dropped nearly 3%, with the semiconductor ETF down 2.28%. Optical communication was the worst-performing AI sub-sector, with Coherent plunging over 14%. The sell-off centered on Nvidia, which fell 2.86% on reports it is collaborating with major financial institutions to mobilize over $500 billion in third-party capital for AI infrastructure. Market concerns focused on whether this creates a circular financing loop and if future AI facilities can generate sufficient cash flow. Other notable moves: Intel dropped over 4% on a new share offering. Microsoft rose 1.21% on plans for its next-gen Maia 300 chip. The software sector outperformed, with Palantir up 1.85%. Energy stocks rallied nearly 4.7% on geopolitical risks. Key upcoming events include the RBA rate decision on Aug 11 and earnings from Lumentum, CoreWeave, and Super Micro Computer after the close on Aug 12, which will test the real demand for AI infrastructure.

marsbit26m ago

Wall Street Morning Report: Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Falls Nearly 3%, Nvidia's 'Circular Financing' Concerns Trigger Tech Stock Correction, Optical Communication and Chip Stocks Plunge

marsbit26m ago

Podcast Notes | VanEck Digital Asset Research Head: Current AI Infrastructure Rally Not a Bubble; Crypto Market Quiet Due to Institutional Disappointment in L1s

In this podcast, VanEck's Head of Digital Asset Research Matthew Sigel discusses the current market dynamics. He argues the ongoing AI infrastructure boom is not a bubble, contrasting it with the 19th-century railroad mania. Unlike railroads funded by speculative land grants and government bonds, today's AI data centers are backed by long-term private contracts and significant customer prepayments, making the investment cycle more sustainable. Sigel notes a recent market shift: companies with high capital expenditures (capex) were rewarded in early 2024 but are now being punished. Cryptocurrencies, categorized as software assets, have suffered alongside the broader software sector. His NODE ETF has outperformed Bitcoin by nearly 100 percentage points over 15 months, largely by betting on Bitcoin miners transitioning into AI data centers. He highlights the value of miners' key assets—power and land—and their new ability to fund growth through debt instead of diluting shareholders. Regarding the crypto market's weakness, Sigel points to institutional disappointment with major Layer-1 (L1) blockchains like Ethereum and Solana. Post-election rallies lacked breakout applications, and regulated entities are increasingly building their own private, permissioned chains (e.g., by Circle, Stripe, Wells Fargo), diluting the "winner-takes-all" potential of public L1s. He believes a regulatory catalyst like the CLARITY Act, which would enforce disclosure standards, could trigger a significant relief rally for some tokens, but remains cautious until then. He also views proposals by ETH, Solana, and NEAR to reduce token inflation as a positive, necessary adjustment for the maturing sector.

marsbit30m ago

Podcast Notes | VanEck Digital Asset Research Head: Current AI Infrastructure Rally Not a Bubble; Crypto Market Quiet Due to Institutional Disappointment in L1s

marsbit30m ago

Shenzhen Competing for 'Tsinghua Faction' Talent

Shenzhen is actively attracting Tsinghua University-affiliated technology ventures, as highlighted during the "X-Day" Xili Lake Roadshow held in Nanshan. The event featured six startup projects from Tsinghua alumni, spanning semiconductors, AI, materials, and healthcare. The showcased companies include: Zhichen Semiconductor, developing edge AI chips; Guangsu Evolution, creating AI-powered home security systems; Qingli Technology, commercializing "self-superlubricating" technology; Shu Yu Technology, offering an AI Agent for analog chip design; Heyi Intelligent Control, providing AI-driven building management systems; and Shengshengyi, applying AI to assisted reproductive medicine. These ventures represent a trend of deep-tech innovation closely linked to academic research. The roadshow series, initiated a year ago, underscores a strategic shift in Shenzhen's investment landscape. Venture capital is moving earlier into the innovation cycle, seeking projects directly from laboratories and research papers. Tsinghua University serves as a key source for such early-stage, technology-intensive startups. Over the past two years, Tsinghua alumni projects have accounted for nearly 30% of the approximately 280 billion RMB in early-stage deep-tech funding in Shenzhen. The "X-Day" platform has facilitated significant growth. To date, its 19 roadshows have connected companies with investors thousands of times, leading to over 3.3 billion RMB in equity financing for 58 firms. Past participants like Kuaiwei Intelligent (recently valued over 10 billion RMB after a Series B round) and Lingcifang (securing four funding rounds in 18 months) exemplify the successful trajectory from this ecosystem. The activity underscores Shenzhen's, particularly Nanshan District's, role in bridging academic research from institutions like Tsinghua with industrial application and venture capital.

marsbit31m ago

Shenzhen Competing for 'Tsinghua Faction' Talent

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.7k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片