Standard Chartered, Coinbase deepen alliance to build institutional crypto infrastructure

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-14Last updated on 2025-12-14

Abstract

Standard Chartered and Coinbase have expanded their partnership to build crypto infrastructure for institutional clients. The collaboration will explore offerings across trading, prime services, custody, staking, and lending. The partnership combines Standard Chartered’s banking and custody expertise with Coinbase’s institutional crypto platform to develop secure, compliant digital asset services. This builds on their existing relationship in Singapore, where Standard Chartered provides real-time SGD transfers for Coinbase. Separately, the US OCC conditionally approved national trust bank charters for five crypto-related firms, including BitGo, Fidelity, Paxos, Circle, and Ripple. Coinbase is also expected to announce new products soon.

Standard Chartered and Coinbase have expanded their partnership to build crypto infrastructure for institutional clients.

As part of the partnership, the duo will explore offerings across trading, prime services, custody, staking and lending, the British multinational bank announced on Friday.

“We aim to explore how the two organisations can support secure, transparent and interoperable solutions that meet the highest standards of security and compliance,” Margaret Harwood-Jones, global head of financing and securities services at Standard Chartered, said.

The two firms said the partnership combines Standard Chartered’s cross-border banking and custody expertise with Coinbase’s institutional crypto platform. The goal is to develop an integrated suite of services that allows institutions to trade and manage digital assets within a secure and compliant framework.

Related: Coinbase opens Solana DEX access as CeFi and DeFi converge

Standard Chartered, Coinbase build on Singapore partnership

The announcement builds on an existing relationship in Singapore, where Standard Chartered already provides banking connectivity for Coinbase, enabling real-time Singapore dollar transfers for the exchange’s customers.

Last year, Crypto.com also partnered with Standard Chartered to roll out global retail banking services that allow users in more than 90 countries to deposit and withdraw US dollars, euros and UAE dirhams through its app.

Meanwhile, Coinbase is set to announce new products next week that could include prediction markets and tokenized stocks.

Related: Pantera, Coinbase back Surf’s $15M push to build crypto-native AI models

Bank regulator clears path for crypto trust banks

On Friday, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency conditionally approved national trust bank charter applications for five companies linked to the digital asset sector.

The approvals cover BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets and Paxos, which plan to convert existing state-chartered trust companies into national trust banks, as well as new applicants Circle and Ripple.

Magazine: 2026 is the year of pragmatic privacy in crypto — Canton, Zcash and more

Related Questions

QWhat is the main focus of the expanded partnership between Standard Chartered and Coinbase?

AThe main focus is to build crypto infrastructure for institutional clients, exploring offerings across trading, prime services, custody, staking, and lending.

QHow does the partnership leverage the strengths of both Standard Chartered and Coinbase?

AIt combines Standard Chartered's cross-border banking and custody expertise with Coinbase's institutional crypto platform to develop secure and compliant digital asset services.

QWhat existing relationship did Standard Chartered and Coinbase have in Singapore prior to this announcement?

AStandard Chartered already provides banking connectivity for Coinbase in Singapore, enabling real-time Singapore dollar transfers for the exchange's customers.

QWhat other major crypto exchange has Standard Chartered partnered with recently, and what service did they provide?

AStandard Chartered partnered with Crypto.com to roll out global retail banking services allowing users in over 90 countries to deposit and withdraw US dollars, euros, and UAE dirhams.

QWhat significant regulatory development for crypto companies was announced on the same day?

AThe US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency conditionally approved national trust bank charter applications for five digital asset companies: BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, Paxos, Circle, and Ripple.

Related Reads

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit2h ago

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit2h ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手2h ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手2h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit4h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片