South Korea’s Coinone Explores Sale of Chairman’s Stake

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-26Last updated on 2026-01-26

Abstract

South Korea's third-largest cryptocurrency exchange, Coinone, is exploring the sale of a stake held by its chairman and largest shareholder, Cha Myung-hoon. According to a report, the potential sale involves Cha's 53.4% stake, which includes his personal holdings and shares owned by his company, The One Group. Coinone is in preliminary discussions with overseas exchanges and local financial institutions regarding equity investments, though no specific decisions have been made. The report also suggests shares from the second-largest shareholder, gaming firm Com2uS, may be included. This move follows financial pressures at Coinone, which reported recent losses and a decreased book value. U.S.-based Coinbase may be involved in the sale, with officials scheduled to visit South Korea for meetings. The discussions remain preliminary, and no deal has been finalized.

The third-biggest cryptocurrency exchange in South Korea, Coinone, is looking for the sale of shares held by its chairman, as revealed via a report from local news outlet Seoul Economic Daily.

The exchange is looking for different options to sell a portion of Chairman and biggest shareholder Cha Myung-hoon’s 53.4% stake, as revealed by the report. The holdings of Cha comprise his personal stake of 19.14% and a 3.43% stake owned by his company, The One Group.

A Coinone representative has reported that the firm is talking with prominent overseas exchanges and local financial institutions regarding potential participation in the sale via equity investments but also highlighted that nothing specific has been decided till now.

What did the report further mention?

Cha, who formerly was a white hat hacker, has lately returned to active management after a four-month hiatus after his resignation as the Chief Executive Officer. The report mentioned that his return may be associated with the preparations for the stake sale or a bigger deal.

It further went on to add that shares held by the second-biggest shareholder, local gaming company Com2uS, which possessed around a 38.42% stake between 2021 and 2022, could also possibly be comprised in any deal.

The advancement comes as Coinone carries on to witness financial pressure. The exchange also witnessed a loss in the past few periods, leaving it with a book value of around 75.2 billion won at the end of Q3. However, this is lower than the last valuation of 94.4 billion won, as per the report.

The report quoted industry sources and revealed Coinbase may be included in the sale, adding that officials from the U.S. exchange are set to visit South Korea this week to meet with Coinone officials and those from other local companies.

Any public confirmation of the finalised deal has not been made from the company, and the discussion is still preliminary.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Japan Targets First Crypto ETFs Approval by 2028

TagsCryptoKorbit CoinoneSouth Korea

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason behind Coinone exploring the sale of its chairman's stake?

AThe exchange is facing financial pressure and has witnessed losses in recent periods, with its book value decreasing from 94.4 billion won to 75.2 billion won by the end of Q3.

QWhat percentage of Coinone does Chairman Cha Myung-hoon currently own?

AChairman Cha Myung-hoon owns a 53.4% stake, comprising his personal stake of 19.14% and a 3.43% stake owned by his company, The One Group.

QWhich potential buyers is Coinone discussing the stake sale with?

ACoinone is talking with prominent overseas exchanges, including potentially Coinbase, and local financial institutions regarding equity investments.

QWhat significant change occurred in Cha Myung-hoon's role prior to his return to active management?

ACha Myung-hoon resigned as Chief Executive Officer and was on a four-month hiatus before recently returning to active management.

QWhich other major shareholder's stake might be included in a potential deal besides the chairman's?

AShares held by the second-biggest shareholder, local gaming company Com2uS, which possessed around a 38.42% stake between 2021 and 2022, could also be included in any deal.

Related Reads

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit3h ago

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit3h ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手3h ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手3h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit5h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片