South Korean Lawmakers Propose Bill To Abolish 22% Upcoming Crypto Tax

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-20Last updated on 2026-03-20

Abstract

South Korea's opposition People Power Party (PPP) has proposed a bill to abolish the upcoming 20% income tax (up to 22% with local taxes) on crypto assets, scheduled to take effect in 2027. The party argues that classifying crypto as a commodity, similar to recent US regulatory guidance, makes its taxation under the current system inappropriate and could lead to double taxation. They also raised concerns about fairness, consistency, and administrative challenges. The ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK), which had previously supported the tax with a higher deduction limit, has agreed to review the amendment but noted it had not been previously discussed and that their stance had been to proceed with the existing policy.

South Korea’s opposition party has proposed a bill to abolish the upcoming income tax on crypto assets, citing US regulators’ guidance on asset classification, concerns about double taxation, and inconsistencies with the current tax system.

SK Lawmakers Push To Repeal Crypto Taxation

On Thursday, local news outlet Digital Asset reported that South Korea’s People Power Party (PPP) proposed a bill to amend the long-delayed Income Tax Act, which is scheduled to take effect next year.

According to the report, PPP’s floor leader, Song Eun-seok, introduced the legislation on March 19, seeking to abolish the taxation of crypto assets. If approved, the amendment would remove all provisions governing the taxation of digital assets in the current Income Tax Act.

Under the current digital assets law, crypto assets will be subject to a 20% income tax rate, up to 22% including local taxes, starting January 1, 2027, with a deduction limit of 2.5 million won.

Originally, the government proposed implementing a 20% tax on crypto gains by January 2022. However, the rule change has been postponed three times, including a two-year delay to the January 1, 2025, implementation date in December 2024.

As the report noted, the People Power Party and the Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) clashed over the latest two-year delay, with the PPP and the government supporting the postponement. In contrast, the DPK advocated raising the tax deduction limit to 50 million won rather than postponing crypto taxation, ultimately agreeing to postpone it until 2027.

The proposed amendment mentioned recent joint guidance by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). This guidance classified most digital assets as commodities rather than securities, which reportedly raised concerns in South Korea that “treating them under the same tax system as securities is inappropriate.”

“Since digital assets are already classified as commodities in Korea and subject to the value-added tax system, imposing an additional income tax on them would create issues of double taxation,” the report added, citing the bill.

The amendment contends that imposing a separate income tax on digital assets raises concerns regarding the fairness and consistency of the tax system, considering that the financial investment income tax has been abolished to promote capital market development and protect investors.

If income tax is imposed in the future, significant practical and administrative difficulties are expected, such as determining the acquisition cost for non-resident foreigners, which would limit the effectiveness of the system.

DPK To Review Tax Amendment Despite Long-Standing Policy

In response to the People Power Party’s push to abolish the 20% crypto taxes, the Democratic Party of Korea has affirmed that it will review the recently introduced amendment.

DPK’s Senior Deputy Floor Leader for Policy, Kim Han-kyu, acknowledged PPP’s concerns about tax equity between stocks and crypto assets and the consistency of the Korean tax system.

“I am aware that there are calls to strike a balance between the stock market and the digital asset market in terms of taxation,” he told reporters after a general meeting of lawmakers on Thursday.

Kim also revealed the South Korean ruling party had not considered a proposal or any measures to abolish the upcoming crypto taxation, as it had “not yet reached a level where it is being seriously discussed or where there is a consensus within the party.”

The PPP’s bill was not previously discussed between the ruling and opposition parties in advance, he stated, but affirmed that DPK lawmakers will discuss the bill in the Finance and Economy Committee now that it has been introduced.

Nonetheless, he noted that the party’s stance had previously been to proceed with the existing bill, previously advocating a higher deduction limit instead, which could signal the proposed amendment risks limited support from the DPK.

The total crypto market capitalization is at $2.36 trillion in the one-week chart. Source: TOTAL on TradingView

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of the bill proposed by South Korea's People Power Party (PPP)?

AThe main purpose of the bill is to abolish the upcoming 20% income tax on crypto assets by removing all provisions governing their taxation in the current Income Tax Act.

QWhat are the key reasons cited by the PPP for proposing to abolish the crypto tax?

AThe key reasons include the US regulators' guidance classifying most digital assets as commodities (not securities), concerns about double taxation since crypto is already subject to value-added tax, and inconsistencies with the current tax system which abolished the financial investment income tax to promote capital markets.

QWhen was the current 20% crypto income tax (up to 22% with local taxes) originally scheduled to take effect, and what is its new implementation date?

AThe tax was originally proposed to take effect in January 2022 but has been postponed multiple times. Its current scheduled implementation date is January 1, 2027.

QHow did the Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) initially differ from the PPP regarding the crypto tax?

AThe DPK initially advocated for raising the tax deduction limit to 50 million won instead of postponing the tax, but they ultimately agreed to the postponement until 2027. Their long-standing policy has been to proceed with the tax.

QWhat was the response of the Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) to the PPP's newly proposed amendment?

AThe DPK affirmed that it will review the amendment in the Finance and Economy Committee. However, a senior DPK official noted that the party had not seriously discussed abolishing the tax and that its previous stance was to proceed with the existing bill, indicating limited support for the PPP's proposal.

Related Reads

Cook's Curtain Call and Ternus Takes the Helm: The Disruption and Reboot of Apple's 4 Trillion Dollar Empire

Tim Cook has officially announced he will step down as CEO of Apple in September, transitioning to executive chairman after a 15-year tenure during which he grew the company’s market value from around $350 billion to nearly $4 trillion. He will be succeeded by John Ternus, a 50-year-old hardware engineering veteran who has been groomed for the role through increasing public visibility and internal responsibility. Ternus’s appointment signals a strategic shift toward hardware and engineering leadership, with Johny Srouji—head of Apple Silicon—taking on an expanded role as Chief Hardware Officer. This consolidation aims to strengthen Apple’s core technological capabilities. However, Cook’s departure highlights a significant unresolved issue: Apple’s delayed and fragmented approach to artificial intelligence. Despite early efforts, such as hiring John Giannandrea from Google in 2018, Apple’s AI initiatives—particularly around Siri—have struggled with internal restructuring and reliance on external partnerships, including with Google. The transition comes at a critical moment as Apple faces paradigm shifts with the rise of artificial general intelligence (ASI). The company’s closed ecosystem of hardware, software, and services—once a major advantage—now presents challenges in adapting to an AI-centric world where intelligence may matter more than the device itself. Ternus must quickly articulate a clear AI strategy, possibly starting at WWDC, to reassure markets and redefine Apple’s role in a new technological era. His task is not only to maintain Apple’s operational excellence but also to reinvigorate its capacity to innovate and lead in the age of AI.

marsbit43m ago

Cook's Curtain Call and Ternus Takes the Helm: The Disruption and Reboot of Apple's 4 Trillion Dollar Empire

marsbit43m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片