Skynet Hack3D Report Highlights Web3 Security in 2025

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2025-12-24Last updated on 2025-12-24

Abstract

Web3 entered 2025 with strong momentum due to improved macroeconomic conditions, supportive U.S. policies, and growing institutional confidence. However, total losses from cyberattacks reached $3.35 billion, a 37% increase from 2024. Excluding the $1.45 billion Bybit exploit—attributed to the Lazarus Group via a supply-chain attack—losses actually decreased year-over-year, indicating a shift toward fewer but more sophisticated and high-value attacks. Phishing was the most common attack vector, accounting for $722.9 million across 248 incidents, followed by code-related exploits at $554.6 million. AI played a dual role: enhancing defensive tools like automated audits while also enabling highly convincing phishing campaigns, deepfake impersonations, and rapid exploit replication. Regulatory clarity improved with the U.S. GENIUS Act and E.U.’s MiCA implementation, raising security and compliance standards. CertiK expanded its security offerings, integrating risk analysis tools, publishing major reports, and advancing research in zkEVM and consensus mechanisms. As Web3 grows, integrating security at all levels remains essential to mitigate evolving AI-driven and systemic risks.

The Web3 ecosystem entered 2025 with renewed momentum, buoyed by improving macroeconomic conditions, stronger investor confidence, and a noticeably more supportive political climate in the United States. The new U.S. administration moved quickly to position digital assets as a strategic innovation sector rather than a regulatory anomaly, sending an early signal that blockchain technology would be encouraged rather than restrained. This shift restored confidence among builders, institutions, and venture capital, helping decentralized applications expand deeper into payments, gaming, tokenized assets, identity solutions, and real-world financial use cases.

Yet, as activity accelerated across the ecosystem, so did the threat landscape. Cyber adversaries evolved alongside the industry, refining both technical exploits and social engineering techniques. While innovation surged, 2025 became a stark reminder that growth and risk continue to move in parallel within Web3.

According to industry data, total losses in 2025 reached $3.35 billion, marking a 37% increase compared to $2.45 billion in 2024. At first glance, the numbers suggest a dramatic deterioration in security conditions. However, a closer look reveals a more nuanced picture. One single incident, the Bybit exploit, accounted for approximately $1.45 billion of the year’s losses. When this outlier is excluded, overall stolen funds would have declined year over year, underscoring a critical shift in attacker behavior.

Rather than relying on a high volume of mid-sized exploits, threat actors increasingly concentrated resources into fewer but far more devastating operations. The Bybit incident demonstrated the growing presence of well-funded, highly coordinated adversaries capable of executing complex, long-horizon attacks. This trend suggests that while baseline security hygiene is improving across many protocols, systemic risks remain, particularly at the infrastructure and supply-chain level.

When categorizing attack vectors, phishing emerged as the most prevalent threat in 2025. Excluding the Bybit supply-chain breach, phishing accounted for $722.9 million stolen across 248 incidents, surpassing both code vulnerabilities and infrastructure attacks in frequency. Code-related exploits followed closely, resulting in $554.6 million across 240 incidents, although nearly half of those funds were eventually frozen or returned, highlighting improved response coordination and on-chain intervention capabilities.

Artificial intelligence played a defining role in shaping this evolving threat environment. On the defensive side, developers increasingly relied on AI-powered tools to generate test cases, identify inefficiencies, enhance formal verification, and streamline audit workflows. Conversely, attackers adopted the same technologies at scale. AI-generated phishing interfaces became nearly indistinguishable from legitimate dApps and wallet prompts, while automated multilingual campaigns expanded reach into previously insulated communities.

Threat actors also leveraged AI for reconnaissance, scraping on-chain data and private chat channels to identify high-value targets. Impersonation attacks grew more convincing, with fake founder accounts, synthetic voices, and deepfake videos eroding traditional trust signals. Perhaps most concerning was the speed of exploit replication, as AI tools enabled attackers to copy and deploy successful attack patterns within days or even hours.

Regulatory clarity improved significantly throughout 2025, helping stabilize the broader ecosystem. In the U.S., the GENIUS Act established early frameworks for stablecoin oversight and digital asset transparency, while signaling a more cooperative stance toward innovation. Globally, the European Union advanced toward full MiCA implementation, raising standards for disclosures and consumer protection. Meanwhile, jurisdictions such as Singapore and Hong Kong expanded digital asset sandboxes, and countries including Brazil and Colombia progressed toward regulated commodity tokenization frameworks.

These developments contributed to more structured governance and influenced how projects approached compliance, architecture, and operational security. As regulations matured, security increasingly became a prerequisite for market access rather than an optional feature.

One of the year’s most significant incidents occurred in February, when Bybit suffered the largest crypto theft in history. The attack, attributed to the Lazarus Group, did not exploit Bybit’s internal systems directly. Instead, attackers compromised a developer machine at Safe{Wallet}, a third-party multi-signature wallet provider. Malicious code injected into the wallet interface altered transaction details invisibly, causing authorized signers to unknowingly approve fraudulent transfers. The incident exposed the growing risks associated with trusted tooling and supply-chain dependencies.

Beyond large-scale breaches, individual users faced mounting risks. AI-driven phishing, deepfake impersonation, and targeted social engineering attacks surged throughout the year. Many losses went unreported, particularly those linked to off-chain scams such as pig-butchering schemes and investment fraud, suggesting that actual user losses are likely far higher than recorded figures.

As 2026 approaches, the trajectory of Web3 security is becoming clearer. Attackers are expected to further refine AI-powered impersonation and phishing campaigns, while supply-chain attacks may grow more sophisticated. At the same time, stronger regulation, real-time monitoring, and AI-assisted defenses offer a path toward reducing preventable losses.

2025 at CertiK

2025 marked a milestone year for CertiK, defined by expanded research, deeper ecosystem integrations, and continued leadership in Web3 security. Below are some of the key achievements that shaped the year:

  • Integrated Token Scan with ChainGPT and Binance Wallet, extending real-time token risk analysis directly into widely used Web3 tools.
  • Published the Skynet Stablecoin Spotlight Report: H1 2025, delivering an in-depth review of the stablecoin landscape, key vulnerabilities, and how the Skynet Security Score can be used to assess stablecoin risk.
  • Released the 2025 Skynet RWA Security Report, providing structured due-diligence criteria and a comprehensive risk review framework for real-world asset (RWA) protocols.
  • Launched the 2025 Skynet Korea Web3 Security & Ecosystem Report, offering insights into South Korea’s Web3 market dynamics and profiling leading platforms in the region.
  • Published the 2025 Skynet Digital Asset Treasuries (DAT) Report, introducing the Skynet DAT Security & Compliance Framework to evaluate operational integrity beyond surface-level metrics.
  • Released the Skynet U.S. Digital Asset Policy Report, summarizing the legal foundations, market-structure implications, and operational requirements of the GENIUS Act and CLARITY Act in the United States.
  • Conducted a full-scale security assessment of the USDCx mint and burn process on Canton Network, including audits of on-chain Daml smart contracts and penetration testing of off-chain infrastructure.
  • Launched CertiK SkyNode, a validator node service designed to improve network security, reliability, and performance across multiple public blockchain ecosystems.
  • Co-published research with Ant Group’s AntChain (Ant Dense Computing) focused on the formal verification of core components within the Asterinas operating system.
  • Introduced the LiDO framework, presented by CertiK Co-Founder Professor Shao Zhong, addressing critical security challenges in Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) consensus mechanisms.
  • Secured two grants from the Ethereum Foundation, reinforcing CertiK’s leadership position in zkEVM formal verification research.
  • Rolled out Skynet leaderboards, a security-focused ranking platform designed to evaluate and compare crypto and Web3 project security.
  • Released ecosystem-specific showcase leaderboards to support strategic Layer 1 growth, including dedicated leaderboards for BNB Chain and SUI..

In this rapidly evolving environment, long-term success will depend on integrating security into every layer of Web3 development. As the largest Web3 security services provider, CertiK continues to play a central role in safeguarding the ecosystem, supporting thousands of projects, and strengthening trust as blockchain technology moves closer to mainstream adoption.

TagsBlockchainexchange

Related Questions

QWhat was the total value of losses in the Web3 ecosystem in 2025, and how did it compare to the previous year?

ATotal losses in 2025 reached $3.35 billion, which was a 37% increase compared to the $2.45 billion lost in 2024.

QWhich single incident was responsible for the largest portion of losses in 2025, and how much was stolen?

AThe Bybit exploit was the largest single incident, accounting for approximately $1.45 billion of the year's total losses.

QWhat was the most prevalent type of attack vector in 2025, excluding the Bybit incident?

APhishing was the most prevalent attack vector, accounting for $722.9 million stolen across 248 incidents.

QHow did artificial intelligence (AI) impact the Web3 security landscape in 2025?

AAI was used both defensively by developers for tasks like generating test cases and enhancing audits, and offensively by attackers for creating convincing phishing interfaces, automated multilingual campaigns, reconnaissance, and rapid exploit replication.

QWhat significant U.S. regulatory development for digital assets is mentioned in the report?

AThe GENIUS Act established early frameworks for stablecoin oversight and digital asset transparency, signaling a more cooperative U.S. stance toward innovation.

Related Reads

Bitroot Public Chain Invited to Attend Tencent Cloud Singapore AI Conference, Discussing the Future Alongside Solana

On May 19, Bitroot, an emerging Layer 1 blockchain, participated in the Tencent Cloud AI Summit in Singapore alongside key industry players like Solana Foundation. The event explored the intersection of AI infrastructure, enterprise applications, AI Agents, and Web3. Bitroot's invitation, despite being pre-mainnet, highlights industry interest in its focus on high-performance, AI-native architecture tailored for future AI Agent execution and verifiable on-chain automation. Bitroot CEO Juan Jose emphasized that AI competition is shifting from model performance to data, real-world application scenarios, and trust infrastructure. He argued that for AI Agents to evolve from assistants to autonomous executors managing transactions and assets, they require low-latency, low-cost, and high-throughput blockchain environments. Bitroot aims to address this through its EVM-compatible design, optimistic parallel execution, and a consensus mechanism targeting high scalability. Currently in its Testnet 5.0 phase, Bitroot reports metrics like over 50,000 peak TPS and sub-0.3 second average block time. Its narrative positions it within a growing landscape where next-generation Layer 1s like Monad and Aptos also compete on performance, while Bitroot differentiates by integrating AI computational capabilities natively across its stack. The summit underscored that the fusion of AI and Web3 is moving from concept to infrastructure competition, where networks balancing performance, security, and verifiability will be crucial for enabling scalable AI-driven applications.

marsbit7m ago

Bitroot Public Chain Invited to Attend Tencent Cloud Singapore AI Conference, Discussing the Future Alongside Solana

marsbit7m ago

Hedge Fund Q1 Interpretation: Everyone Is Selling Software, Buying Chips

Hedge Funds and Mutual Funds Aligned in Q1: Dumping Software, Buying Chips A clear consensus emerged among major U.S. hedge funds and mutual funds in Q1: they were simultaneously selling software stocks and pouring capital into the semiconductor sector. This aggressive rotation pushed semiconductor exposure in hedge fund long portfolios to a record high. Hedge funds delivered a 7% return year-to-date, while only 30% of large-cap active mutual funds outperformed their benchmarks. The average short interest for S&P 500 constituents rose to 3% of market cap, the highest since 2011. Within technology, the structural shift was stark. Hedge funds' semiconductor weighting hit an all-time high, while software fell to its lowest since 2019. Excluding Microsoft, mutual funds' relative overexposure to semis vs. software was the largest since 2012. Microsoft was among the most net-sold stocks by both groups. Hedge funds net purchased semiconductor names like LRCX and AMAT. Strategies diverged on leverage and cash. Hedge funds increased their net exposure to near a one-year high after an initial cut. Mutual funds raised their cash allocation, though it remains historically low at 1.4%. Sector alignment was high in Industrials (both overweight) but divergent in Tech: hedge funds increased their Tech net tilt by a record 853 basis points, while mutual funds reduced theirs. Clear splits also appeared in Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Four stocks appeared on both Goldman's hedge fund VIP and mutual fund overweight lists: BA, MA, MRVL, and V. This "shared favorites" basket has returned 10% YTD, outperforming the equal-weight S&P 500. Notably, all "Magnificent Seven" stocks are on the hedge fund VIP list but are uniformly underweighted by mutual funds.

marsbit17m ago

Hedge Fund Q1 Interpretation: Everyone Is Selling Software, Buying Chips

marsbit17m ago

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

The Evolution of Physical Bitcoin Bitcoin's digital nature is its core strength, enabling self-custody and rapid global transfers. However, its intangibility also hinders mainstream adoption. For over a decade, creators have attempted to materialize Bitcoin while preserving its cash-like properties, yielding notable results. Casascius Coins, launched in 2011, were the first and most iconic physical Bitcoin. Creator Mike Caldwell generated private keys offline, printed them on coins, and sealed them with tamper-evident holograms. This model relied on user trust in the centralized issuer. Production ceased in 2013 due to regulatory pressure from FinCEN. RavenBit Coins emerged in 2014 aiming to decentralize minting by letting users generate and apply their own keys. However, this led to trust issues with numerous untrusted minters and insecure key generation methods. In 2016, Coinkite introduced Opendimes—a breakthrough in bearer asset technology. These USB-shaped devices generate and store keys internally. Funds can be received by checking the public key, but spending requires physically breaking the device to extract the private key. While innovative and open-source, its cost (~$20) and form factor limit its use for small, everyday transactions. Satochip's Satodime, a card-shaped device using similar secure chip technology, followed. It supports NFC interaction and comes in various forms. While potentially cheaper in bulk (~13€), it remains a high-security hardware wallet, not a low-cost cash substitute. A fundamental cost barrier exists. For physical Bitcoin to achieve widespread commercial use, hardware costs must drop below $1 to match the production cost of fiat banknotes. Current secure chips capable of running Bitcoin's cryptographic algorithms (like secp256k1) are too expensive. Chips like NXP's NTAG X DNA (~$3) show cost-reduction potential but lack native Bitcoin curve support. Projects like OfflineCash embed chips in banknote-like paper, but face challenges with durability, the need for custom Bitcoin-enabled chips, and the inherent requirement for users to verify balances online—which conflicts with Bitcoin's trustless ideal. Coinkite's Tapsigner, a ~$20 card with a proprietary Bitcoin NFC chip, is seen as a more practical step forward. It functions as a reloadable hardware wallet for contactless payments, solving the "change" problem and focusing on real-world retail integration, a direction also pursued by companies like Cash App and Square. In summary, the journey to physical Bitcoin has progressed from trusted centralized mints (Casascius) to user-generated keys (RavenBit) and finally to self-contained secure hardware (Opendimes, Satodime, Tapsigner). The core challenge remains developing a sufficiently low-cost, durable, and truly trustless physical bearer asset that can function like cash in daily transactions. Current solutions are either too expensive or introduce new trust assumptions, keeping the ideal of ubiquitous physical Bitcoin just out of reach for now.

marsbit1h ago

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片