Six-Year Evolution of Web3 Airdrops: From Uniswap to Monad, How Should Ordinary People Properly 'Farm Airdrops' in 2026?

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-09Last updated on 2026-04-09

Abstract

Web3 airdrops have evolved significantly from Uniswap's 2020 genesis event, where early users were simply rewarded for protocol usage, to complex systems emphasizing genuine participation, identity verification, and attention economics. Key phases include: - **Phase 1 (2020)**: DeFi airdrops like Uniswap, with no Sybil resistance or tasks—pure reward for usage. - **Phase 2 (2021)**: ENS introduced the concept of "users as shareholders," focusing on governance and contribution. - **Phase 3 (2022-2023)**: Airdrops became growth hacking tools (e.g., Aptos, Arbitrum, Celestia), using multi-tier scoring and cross-ecosystem criteria. - **Phase 4 (2024-2026)**: Points systems (e.g., Blast, EigenLayer) prioritize TVL, duration, and liquidity locking over transaction volume. Future trends indicate: - Chain-level airdrops are declining; ecosystem-level airdrops (e.g., restaking, lending) will dominate. - Rising capital requirements and AI-driven allocation using on-chain reputation and behavior analysis. - A shift from rewards to attention economics, where community influence and identity matter most. For 2026, focus on: - Technical contributions (e.g., testnet nodes). - Completed quests and points systems. - Active community engagement (Discord, social media). - Long-term participation and identity building. Airdrops are no longer just token distributions but tools for user acquisition, governance, and community building. Success requires strategy升级: ...

Author: kkmoat, GANx Labs Founder & stacks.btc Chinese Community Lead

Web3 Airdrops are essentially a core strategy for projects to incentivize early user participation, bootstrap liquidity, decentralize governance, and rapidly accumulate community and TVL (Total Value Locked) by freely distributing native tokens or NFTs.

From the "DeFi Summer" initiated by Uniswap in 2020 to the present, airdrops have evolved from simple "everyone gets a share" marketing tools into complex behavioral incentive systems, anti-Sybil mechanisms, and long-term retention tools.

Current trends in 2026 show: blanket airdrops have significantly diminished, shifting towards threshold-based, quest/task-mining, and hybrid models, emphasizing genuine usage over volume farming.

Phase 1 (2020): The "Genesis Era" of DeFi Airdrops

Representative Projects

  • Uniswap
  • 1inch
  • dYdX

Must mention Uniswap, because:all subsequent airdrops are essentially its derivatives.

September 2020:

Uniswap distributed 400 UNI to historical users

Directly changed the industry's distribution model

It is basically considered:Web3's first large-scale "wealth redistribution event"

Key Characteristics

1) No Sybil

2) No farming

3) No task system

4) No points

Simply:You used the product → You get money, the essence is Protocol ownership, not Marketing.

Phase 2 (2021): The ENS Era — "Users Own the Protocol"

Representative Projects

  • ENS
  • DYDX
  • Gitcoin

The most iconic among them:ENS (2021)

This was a milestone airdrop because it was the first to explicitly state:

Users are not users

Users are shareholders

ENS distributed governance tokens to users holding .eth domains, for DAO governance.

Why is ENS particularly important?

Because it established:Web3's political system, not its financial system.

Three Long-term Impacts of ENS

1) DAO governance became default

Almost all protocols now have: Governance token

2) "Contribution" became a core metric

For example:

  • Holding a domain
  • Using the protocol
  • Participating in governance

Not simply farming DeFi trading volume.

3) Community ownership narrative took shape

This phrase started with ENS:

users → owners

Phase 3 (2022–2023): Airdrops Become Growth Hacking Tools

This is:The most critical turning point

Airdrops changed from:Rewarding users to:Acquiring users

Representative Projects

The listed ones belong to this phase:

  • Aptos
  • Arbitrum
  • Starknet
  • Celestia

Aptos (2022)

This is:The standardization of the Testnet airdrop model

Characteristics:

Run testnet

Test claiming NFTs

Run a node

It distributed approximately $430 million worth of tokens to testnet users. I only 5 minutes binding Google and Discord accounts, and received an airdrop of 150 APT tokens worth $1700.

Key Change

This was the first time:Technical contribution = airdrop, not just using a Dapp.

Arbitrum (2023)

This is:The largest L2 airdrop

Value close to: $2 billion USD.

Arbitrum made a key innovation:

Multi-tier scoring

For example:

bridge

transaction

liquidity

DAO voting

This directly led to:Airdrops becoming financialized,because: You could optimize your wallet address behavior to increase airdrop weight.

Celestia (2023)

This is:The modular blockchain narrative airdrop

Airdrop recipients included:

Cosmos staker

Rollup developer

Ethereum user

And distributed approximately: $730 million USD.

Key Change

This was the first time:Cross-ecosystem airdrop,not: Single-chain airdrop.

Starknet (2024)

This is:One of the most controversial airdrops,reason: It was the first to start mass filtering users based on a balance condition, and added multi-dimensional black box criteria.

For example:

GitHub developer

Ethereum staker

contributor

And: Approximately 50 million STRK was allocated to early community member programs.

Key Change

This was the first time:identity-based,

not: activity-based.

Phase 4 (2024–2026): The Points Economy Era

This is: The current era.

Core mechanism:

Points system

For example:

  • Blur — Earn points by depositing ETH and trading NFTs
  • Blast — Earn points by depositing ETH
  • EigenLayer — Earn points by restaking
  • LayerZero — Long-term interaction records
  • Scroll — Complete tasks to earn Points

Now: Everything you see is not actually an airdrop.

But rather:pre-airdrop incentive system

Key Change

Airdrops are no longer about completing tasks, but:locking funds,the core metrics now are:

  • TVL
  • duration
  • liquidity

Not:

transaction count

Modern airdrops increasingly rely on points systems to measure user loyalty and deposit duration, but deposits can be stolen, or become unprofitable due to time redundancy, and the final airdrop might even be less than the principal.

Monad: A Very Typical "Attention-Driven Airdrop"

Monad's core is not technology,but:Attention engineering

Testnet has over hundreds of millions of address users, but it's not product-driven, it's:socially driven. This is a key characteristic of the new generation of airdrops.

Participating with lots of address interactions is useless; you need to gain project recognition, obtain Discord roles, have social media influence to get a Monad Card, get nominated—it's increasingly developing like a private domain rather than simple interaction.

Why do almost all projects do airdrops now?

The answer is simple:Airdrops are the cheapest user acquisition method

  • Traditional method: Google Ads
  • Cost: $50–$200 / user
  • Airdrop method: Issue token
  • Cost: 0 (theoretically)

So airdrops becomegrowth tools,not rewards.

The Real Economics of Airdrops (Most people don't realize this)

This is the most important part. Many airdrop projects experience:First rise → then large-scale sell-off

For example:

  • ENS
  • dYdX
  • STRK

Prices rose rapidly driven by market enthusiasm, but then corrected significantly due to selling pressure.

This is called:Airdrop Dump Cycle

Process:

1) Airdrop

2) Price spike

3) Dump

4) Stabilization

This is something almost all airdrop projects experience. Therefore, if you receive an airdrop, you need to think about a good time frame to sell, rather than simply FOMO or FUD.

The Future of Airdrops: 5 Trends,This is my core judgment.

1) Chain-level airdrop is over

For example:

Arbitrum

Starknet

zkSync

Scroll

Basically all have been issued. The future isonly ecosystem airdrops

For example:

Lending

Restaking

NFT infra

So I believe future opportunities mainly come from ecosystem protocols, not the chains themselves.

2) Airdrops are becoming financial products

For example:

staking

restaking

liquidity mining

Essence:Yield (lending),not reward.

3) Capital门槛 will become higher and higher

Before $0, now $1000+ is just entry level, future might even be $10000+, because Sybil costs are rising.

4) AI will participate in airdrop allocation

This is already happening a lot, e.g., auto-chat, auto-trade. Therefore, future projects might use:

on-chain reputation

behavioral pattern

identity graph

These will determine whether you can claim the airdrop, not just connecting and claiming in a single way.

5) Airdrops are becoming an "attention war"

Not a technology competition, but who can attract users.

Most值得关注的空投类型 (2026)

Tier 1 (Most likely to produce large-scale airdrops) Examples below

Monad

Eclipse

Berachain

Movement

Tier 2 (Medium airdrops)

restaking

lending

derivatives

Tier 3 (Small but frequent)

DEX

NFT infra

social

Final Summary (Core Viewpoints)

If I want to summarize,

1) 2020: Airdrop is a reward

2) 2021: Airdrop is user equity

3) 2022: Airdrop is growth

4) 2023: Airdrop is a transaction

4) 2024-2025: Airdrop is finance

5) 2026: Airdrop is attention

What needs to be done

1# Abandon meaningless testnet volume farming

2# Participate in project testnet nodes or technical contributions

3# Participate in the project's explicit airdrop task system

4# Participate in staking, trading, and other systems designed to explicitly obtain Points

5# Be active in Discord communities to gain community contributor status

6# Continuously use the product and participate deeply, long-termism

7# Build on-chain identity, keep Web2 identity active

Since the genesis event of Uniswap in 2020, Web3 airdrops have evolved from simple "use and get rewarded" to complex behavioral incentives, identity verification, and attention economy systems. From ENS explicitly stating that users are protocol shareholders, to projects like Aptos and Arbitrum optimizing airdrop weights through multi-dimensional scoring, to the current Points systems and attention-driven design, the essence of airdrops is no longer just token distribution, but a tool for long-term participation, community building, and value认同.

For long-term participants and newcomers, airdrops are still full of opportunities, but strategies must be upgraded: abandon simple volume farming, deeply participate in testnets and node contributions, complete task systems, actively stake and interact, and build influence within communities. In this way, you may not only receive quality airdrops but also truly become part of the protocol ecosystem.

Although blanket airdrops have significantly cooled, threshold-based, task-mining, and hybrid models are rising, emphasizing genuine usage and long-term value. This means that,as long as the method is appropriate and the strategy is long-term, airdrops are still a viable way to obtain early equity and participate in innovative ecosystems. The future belongs to those who understand on-chain identity, contribute value, and the attention economy—the opportunities in the airdrop industry have never truly disappeared.

In short,Airdrops evolved from reward → user equity → growth → transaction → finance → attention, becoming a core tool for Web3 user acquisition, governance, and community building. The core capabilities for the future lie in identity, contribution, attention, and long-term participation.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the core evolution of Web3 airdrops from 2020 to 2026 according to the article?

AThe core evolution is: 2020 - Airdrops as rewards; 2021 - Airdrops as user equity; 2022 - Airdrops as growth; 2023 - Airdrops as transactions; 2024-2025 - Airdrops as finance; 2026 - Airdrops as attention.

QWhich project is considered the genesis event that started the large-scale 'wealth redistribution' in Web3 airdrops?

AUniswap is considered the genesis event, as it distributed 400 UNI to historical users in September 2020, fundamentally changing the industry's distribution model.

QWhat was the key innovation introduced by the ENS airdrop in 2021?

AThe ENS airdrop introduced the concept that 'users are not users, users are shareholders,' establishing Web3's political system (DAO governance) rather than just a financial system, and making contribution a core metric for distribution.

QWhat is the primary mechanism used in the current 'Phase 4' of airdrops (2024-2026)?

AThe primary mechanism is the 'Points system,' which functions as a pre-airdrop incentive system that measures user loyalty and deposit duration (e.g., TVL, duration, liquidity) rather than just transaction count.

QWhat are the two major future trends for airdrops mentioned in the article?

ATwo major trends are: 1) Airdrops are becoming financial products (e.g., staking, restaking, liquidity mining) focused on yield, not just rewards. 2) AI will participate in airdrop allocation using on-chain reputation, behavioral patterns, and identity graphs to filter users.

Related Reads

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit23m ago

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit23m ago

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbit33m ago

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbit33m ago

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

RWA Weekly: European Banks Form Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network Covering July 24-31, 2026, the RWA sector saw a steady on-chain total value locked (TVL) of $36.8 billion, with holder count hitting a record high. However, stablecoin transfer volumes fell sharply (~30%), indicating low on-chain settlement demand. Key regulatory moves include South Korea advancing stablecoin legislation and a push to scrap crypto taxes, Kenya lowering capital requirements for stablecoin issuers, and Zimbabwe approving seven projects for its crypto sandbox. In project developments, BIS-led Project Agorá successfully tested cross-border payments with tokenized funds across six currencies. Ten major European financial institutions formed the RL1 blockchain cooperative to build tokenized asset infrastructure. Other notable updates: Aviva launched a tokenized dollar liquidity fund on XRPL, POSCO International tokenized commercial invoices on Injective, and a Brazilian farmer used tokenized cattle as collateral for a loan. Additional progress includes BNY Mellon migrating its core transfer agent operations to blockchain, Securitize gaining SEC investment advisor registration, and Tether’s compliant stablecoin USA₮ launching on Celo. Ondo Finance introduced Ondo Network, a new execution layer focused on speed and privacy, moving away from its initial chain plans. An analysis highlights that despite the growing scale of on-chain RWAs (~$32B), approximately 90% remain underutilized in DeFi, pointing to a critical challenge in unlocking liquidity and fostering real-world application beyond mere issuance.

marsbit33m ago

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

marsbit33m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy PEOPLE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)After purchasing your ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Easily trade ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

7.7k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy PEOPLE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of PEOPLE (PEOPLE) are presented below.

活动图片