Pudgy Penguins: Why PENGU’s retail push isn’t winning over bears yet

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-20Last updated on 2026-07-20

Abstract

Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) has expanded into retail with the launch of PENGU plushies, aiming to reach millions of new users and increase utility for its native token. The news prompted a slight price increase to $0.0062, driven by spot buyers, with exchange outflows indicating accumulation. However, the broader market structure remains bearish. Derivatives data shows aggressive selling, with negative volume deltas in perps and futures outflows. Technical indicators like the RSI at 45 confirm seller control. While the retail push could support the price at $0.006 and target $0.0068 with sustained demand, prevailing bearish momentum risks a pullback to $0.0058 if selling pressure continues.

Pudgy Penguins [PENGU] made a major step towards fulfilling its goal to expand its reach beyond the internet.

Following its successful TCG drop in June, Pudgy Penguins has now launched PENGU plushies for retail purchase. The new plushie line marks the NFT project’s biggest push yet into retail. Even more importantly, with this move, Pudgy Penguins extends its reach to millions more users.

In fact, Pudgy Penguins noted this milestone, adding that,

Pengu has been introduced to millions of new people in retail

An expanded user base is good news for the network and the native token, PENGU, as it increases use cases for the token. Furthermore, more traders will discover the token via QR codes on plushies, thus potentially driving demand for PENGU.

How did Pudgy Penguins’ market react?

With the news, the PENGU price made a slight move higher, hiking to $0.0062 before slightly pulling back to $0.0061 at press time. These slight gains were mostly driven by spot buyers who rushed to accumulate.

According to CoinGlass data, the exchange outflows outpaced inflows significantly over the past day. As a result, the Spot Netflow remained negative.

Source: CoinGlass

At press time, the Spot Netflow was -$139k, indicating that more PENGU flowed out of exchanges. Often, reduced supply on exchanges has preceded better price performances.

Bears still dominate perps, risking another pullback

While buyers rushed into the spot on the good news, traders on the derivatives aggressively cashed out on these gains.

Source: Coinalyze

For starters, on the perpetual side, the Perps Sell Volume rose to 984.2 million, compared to 874.9 million in Buy Volume.

As a result, the perps recorded a negative delta of -109.3 million, a clear sign of aggressive selling. The same market behavior was observed on the futures side.

According to CoinGlass data, Futures Outflow rose to $23.4 million while Inflow fell to $22.4 million. For that reason, Futures Netflow dropped 228% to -$975k.

Source: CoinGlass

A negative Futures Netflow suggests that more traders closed their positions, reflecting increased bearishness.

What’s next for the memecoin?

Despite PENGU’s extended reach, the market structure remains strongly bearish. At press time, the Relative Strength Index remained within the bearish zone at 45.

Source: TradingView

This implies sellers are still controlling the market. The Stochastic Momentum Index also confirmed this view, as it remains negative.

Although SMI has been on an upward trajectory, the indicator holds deeply within the bearish zone. Combined, these two indicate that the momentum leans to the downside and is likely to remain so.

Thus, if the slight demand driven by the news fades, exacerbated by derivatives pressure, PENGU will drop to $0.0058. If the plushies help boost demand, however, with the extended base, PENGU could hold $0.006 and target $0.0068.


Final Summary

  • Pudgy Penguins announced the launch of PENGU plushies on all Target shelves across the United States.
  • PENGU market remains structurally bearish, driven by intense selling pressure on thderivativeses market.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Most Difficult Thing to Predict on Polymarket Is... When the POLY Airdrop Will Happen

During the recent World Cup, Polymarket saw record-breaking activity, with its "World Cup winner" market reaching $4.32 billion in volume, making it the platform's highest-volume single prediction event ever. Over the six-week tournament, football markets amassed $85 billion in nominal trading volume, cementing sports as a major growth driver. Capitalizing on this surge in traffic, Polymarket quietly increased fees for its sports markets in early July. The taker fee multiplier was raised from 0.03 to 0.05, effectively raising maximum costs per trade by nearly 70% and moving sports out of its lowest fee tier. This follows a broader trend of the platform gradually expanding fee structures across various market categories since the start of the year to boost revenue. However, community focus is increasingly shifting from trading volumes to the long-awaited POLY token airdrop. Despite a senior executive confirming in late 2025 that a token and airdrop were planned for after U.S. market re-entry, no timeline has been provided. Recent actions, like an affiliated account deleting a potentially suggestive tweet and official help pages stating "no airdrop or token generation event has been announced," have fueled speculation and frustration. The community is divided on the reasons for the delay. Some believe Polymarket is waiting for a more favorable regulatory window in the U.S., while others speculate that the platform's strong organic growth and rising fee revenue have reduced the urgency to issue a token, potentially following a path similar to OpenSea. The prolonged uncertainty has led users to question not the *if*, but the *when*, of the POLY airdrop, turning it into one of the platform's most unpredictable events.

Odaily星球日报10m ago

The Most Difficult Thing to Predict on Polymarket Is... When the POLY Airdrop Will Happen

Odaily星球日报10m ago

After Investing in Changxin, Hefei State Capital Makes Another Move

Two events unfolded within the same week. On July 13th, the Hefei Industrial Investment Xinzhi Xinyu Equity Investment Partnership with a pledged scale of 5 billion RMB was established. Three days later, ChangXin Technology launched its online and offline public offering at a price of 8.66 RMB per share, aiming to raise approximately 57.9 billion RMB. The link between these events is the Hefei Industrial Investment Group (Hefei ChanTou). Hefei ChanTou directly holds shares in ChangXin Technology through its wholly-owned subsidiary, ChangXin Integration, and is also behind the newly established 5 billion RMB fund. This highlights a strategic move: as ChangXin approaches its IPO, Hefei ChanTou establishes a new fund to prepare for the next round of industrial investment. Founded in 2015, Hefei ChanTou is a state-owned capital investment platform focused on industrial financing and innovation. Beyond direct equity holdings in major projects like ChangXin's 12-inch memory wafer manufacturing base, it manages various provincial and municipal government-guided funds. Its self-managed fund scale exceeds 100 billion RMB. ChangXin Technology, now China's leading DRAM manufacturer, exemplifies the classic "Hefei model." A decade ago, when founder Zhu Yiming sought entry into the capital-intensive DRAM sector, Hefei's state capital provided the crucial long-term support. Pre-IPO, entities within the Hefei ChanTou system hold significant direct and indirect stakes, with a theoretical combined value of roughly 116.2 billion RMB based on the IPO price. However, this long-cycle, concentrated investment model brings financial pressure. Hefei ChanTou's financials show significant liabilities, net outflows from investing activities, and reliance on investment income. The focus is now shifting alongside Hefei's broader "654X" industrial system, which encompasses six dominant industries, five emerging industries (like AI and biopharma), and four future industries (including quantum tech and nuclear fusion). The narrative is one of transition. As the ChangXin project reaches a major milestone with its IPO, the new 5 billion RMB fund symbolizes the beginning of the next investment chapter—targeting a more diverse and early-stage array of sectors within Hefei's expanded industrial vision.

marsbit20m ago

After Investing in Changxin, Hefei State Capital Makes Another Move

marsbit20m ago

Should Developers Build on Corporate Blockchains Like Base and Robinhood?

Should developers build on enterprise-backed public chains like Base, Robinhood, or Stripe's Tempo? While these chains offer enticing benefits—primarily access to the platform's existing user base for accelerated growth—they come with significant, well-documented risks stemming from the inherent conflict of interest when a company controls both the underlying chain and major on-chain applications. The core promise is traffic distribution: projects gain exposure through platforms like the Coinbase wallet or app. However, this model creates five major risks: 1. **Direct Competition**: The platform can leverage its data and position to launch and prioritize its own competing products, similar to Amazon creating private-label goods or Microsoft bundling Internet Explorer. 2. **Wallet Agnosticism**: Companion wallets (e.g., Coinbase Wallet) must support multiple chains and integrate top applications across the ecosystem to remain competitive, diluting the promised exclusive traffic advantage for the enterprise chain. 3. **Competitor Exclusion**: Rival platforms (e.g., Coinbase vs. Robinhood) have no incentive to promote applications built on a competitor's chain. 4. **Profit Extraction**: The party controlling end-users holds disproportionate bargaining power and can capture most of the value, squeezing protocol profits down to marginal cost. 5. **Unfulfilled Promises**: Promised traffic support can be deprioritized or withdrawn based on shifting corporate strategies. In contrast, neutral chains like Ethereum or Solana avoid these platform risks entirely. For developers considering enterprise chains, risk mitigation strategies include: evaluating substantial onboarding grants, seeking (though often weak) contractual guarantees, and, most crucially, pursuing a multi-chain strategy while building independent user acquisition channels. Enterprise chains may be useful for initial cold-start growth, but the ultimate goal should be cultivating a dedicated user base rather than long-term dependence on a single, conflicted platform.

marsbit21m ago

Should Developers Build on Corporate Blockchains Like Base and Robinhood?

marsbit21m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片