Polygon holds KEY support after 100M POL burn: What’s next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-21Last updated on 2026-02-21

Abstract

Polygon (POL) has burned 100 million tokens, a major deflationary milestone aimed at reducing supply and supporting price. Despite this, the altcoin's inflation remains elevated, indicating persistent sell pressure. POL's price increased 4.06% to $0.108, flipping the short-term EMA20 and showing bullish momentum, backed by a 17% rise in trading volume. Key indicators like the Stochastic RSI suggest strong buying interest but also significant seller presence. For a sustained bullish move, POL needs to close above $0.11. However, high exchange supply and a declining Stock-to-Flow ratio highlight ongoing downside risks, with a potential pullback to $0.106 if momentum fades.

Polygon [POL] continued to trade within a thin margin, still holding the $0.10 support level. The altcoin flipped its short-term moving average EMA20, signaling strengthening momentum.

At the time of writing, POL traded at $0.108, up 4.06% on the daily charts. This slight price uptick was backed by a 17% jump in trading volume, indicating increased on-chain activity.

Polygon burns 100M tokens

With POL struggling to hold an upside momentum, Polygon has continued to deploy its major deflationary tool to absorb market pressure.

According to the official report, Polygon has achieved a major milestone, burning 100 million POL. Typically, token burns help shrink the circulating supply, reduce inflation, and thus accelerate an asset’s upside momentum.

Even more importantly, sustained token burns reflect higher fees and network revenue, a sign of increased network usage and adoption.

In fact, at the time of writing, Daily Fees and Revenue have stabilized above $200k, with App Fees holding above $500k. When network revenue continues to rise, it suggests higher network participation and actual demand.

A network with sustained demand can boost its native token, potentially driving prices higher.

Any impact on POL price action?

In the short term, Polygon’s token burns have tended to positively impact POL’s price, as the altcoin slightly jumped from the lower boundary.

Notably, the altcoin’s Stochastic RSI made a bullish crossover and rose to 88.27 as of writing, although its signal line remained around 88.

With Stoch rising to such levels, it suggested strong upside momentum as demand stepped into the market. However, the signal remained roughly the same, suggesting a strong seller presence.

Such market conditions indicate a fierce struggle between bulls and bears for market control. For a bullish takeover, POL buyers must push for a daily close above the EMA 20 and EMA 50 at $0.11, setting up a move towards $0.12.

However, if the momentum turns short-lived and sellers cash out these minor gains, the altcoin will pull back towards $0.106.

Inflo remains elevated

Interestingly, despite continued token burns, POL’s inflation remains extremely elevated, signaling higher sell pressure. According to Santiment data, the altcoin’s Stock-to-Flow Ratio continued to decline, falling to 8.6 at press time.

A drop in SFR suggests low scarcity and increased immediate supply. A high supply presents a significant selling pressure in the market.

Even more so, the altcoin’s Exchange Supply Ratio surged to a monthly high of 0.003. When ESR rises, it suggests that a significant amount of Polygon has recently flowed into exchanges.

Therefore, sellers are more active than buyers on exchanges, further straining the already overwhelmed market. Typically, such market conditions tend to accelerate downside momentum, leading to lower prices.


Final Summary

  • Polygon reaches a major deflationary milestone by burning 100 million POL tokens, though inflation remains elevated.
  • POL rose 4% on daily charts, flipping EMA20, indicating short-term bullish momentum.

Related Questions

QWhat was the price impact on POL after the 100 million token burn, and what key support level did it hold?

APOL was trading at $0.108, up 4.06% on the daily charts, and it held the key $0.10 support level.

QWhat is the primary purpose of a token burn, and what does sustained burning activity indicate about a network?

AThe primary purpose of a token burn is to shrink the circulating supply, reduce inflation, and potentially accelerate an asset's upside momentum. Sustained burns reflect higher fees and network revenue, which is a sign of increased network usage and adoption.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what must POL buyers achieve to confirm a bullish takeover and target a move towards $0.12?

AFor a bullish takeover, POL buyers must push for a daily close above the EMA 20 and EMA 50 at $0.11.

QDespite the token burn, why does the article suggest that POL still faces significant selling pressure?

APOL faces significant selling pressure because its Stock-to-Flow Ratio declined, indicating low scarcity and increased immediate supply. Furthermore, its Exchange Supply Ratio surged, meaning more tokens are flowing into exchanges, which typically signals that sellers are more active than buyers.

QWhat two key metrics related to network fees and revenue are mentioned, and what were their approximate values?

AThe two key metrics are Daily Fees and Revenue, which stabilized above $200k, and App Fees, which held above $500k.

Related Reads

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News3m ago

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News3m ago

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

marsbit21m ago

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbit21m ago

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

Is there really a "World Cup Curse" affecting markets? Historical data shows global equity markets often underperform during the tournament. The S&P 500 has averaged negative returns of -1.5% to -2.11% across 19 World Cups since 1950, with declines in 58% of events. China's Shanghai Composite fell in 71% of tournaments since 1994. Studies confirm reduced trading activity during matches, with volumes dropping significantly, especially when a home nation plays. A team's loss can also lead to negative sentiment and selling pressure in its domestic market the next day. However, the "curse" may be partly attributed to seasonal weakness. Many tournaments are held in June-July, a historically weaker period for stocks ("Sell in May and go away"). The 2022 Qatar World Cup, held in November-December, saw a smaller drop in trading volume compared to summer events, suggesting timing plays a role. The cryptocurrency market's performance during World Cups has been mixed and largely driven by its own major catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, FTX collapse, halving cycles) rather than the tournament. Investment opportunities have shifted over time. Traditional beneficiaries like TV manufacturers have seen fading returns as streaming platforms become the core viewing channel. Classic consumer plays like beer and sportswear face challenges from changing consumption trends. Newer digital assets, like fractionalized collectible player cards on blockchain, have seen explosive growth. While gambling is a traditional sector, prediction markets are emerging. In conclusion, while a statistical correlation exists, the World Cup's direct impact on markets is likely limited and intertwined with seasonal patterns. With lower liquidity during the event, the simplest strategy for many might be to step back from trading and enjoy the games.

marsbit28m ago

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

marsbit28m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片