No Bitcoin Buy This Monday: Strategy Opts For Bonds Instead

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-26Last updated on 2026-05-26

Abstract

Strategy, the Bitcoin treasury company, has paused its weekly Bitcoin accumulation for the first time, opting to purchase bonds instead. Co-founder Michael Saylor confirmed the skip in a regular Sunday update, explicitly stating "we bought bonds, not bitcoin." This follows the company's massive $2.01 billion purchase of 24,869 BTC the previous Monday, bringing its total holdings to 843,738 BTC. Saylor hinted the pause is temporary, suggesting "The ₿itVac is charging." Meanwhile, Bitcoin spot ETFs have seen two consecutive weeks of outflows, contrasting with prior inflows. Bitcoin's price briefly dipped below $75,000 over the weekend but has since recovered to around $77,400.

Michael Saylor has confirmed that Bitcoin treasury company Strategy skipped out on Bitcoin accumulation this week, opting to buy bonds instead.

Strategy Has Paused Bitcoin Accumulation For Now

In a new post on X, Strategy co-founder and chairman Michael Saylor revealed that the company didn’t buy Bitcoin during the past week. This post was the latest in the line of Saylor’s regular Sunday posts, which always come with an image of the firm’s portfolio tracker and often, the chairman includes a caption that hints at Strategy’s next Monday purchase announcement. This time, however, Saylor explicitly ruled out more accumulation.

Though this doesn’t mean that Strategy sat idle in the last week. “This week we bought bonds, not bitcoin,” noted Saylor in the post. The pause in buying has come after the treasury company announced a 24,869 BTC mega-acquisition last Monday.

This buy cost the company a whopping $2.01 billion. As the portfolio tracker shared by Saylor shows, the firm’s holdings have grown to 843,738 BTC following the purchase.

The acquisitions made by Strategy since it started BTC accumulation back in 2020 | Source: @saylor on X

Strategy’s cost basis per token is $75,701, so at the current Bitcoin spot price, the company’s holdings are in a profit of about 2.6%. This is relatively minor, but still an improvement from when the firm was underwater between February and April.

While Strategy has skipped out on an acquisition this Monday, it doesn’t mean that the treasury company is halting things altogether. Saylor hinted at this in the post, saying, “The ₿itVac is charging.” ₿itVac here is likely a shorthand for “Bitcoin Vacuum,” which is what the firm acts like when it comes to the cryptocurrency.

Recently, Strategy announced that it has filed to repurchase $1.5 billion of its convertible senior notes due in 2029. The news has come amid Saylor floating the idea of BTC sales, so it’s possible that the treasury firm could participate in distribution to fund this repurchase.

In some other news, the Bitcoin spot ETFs saw their second-straight week of outflows last week, according to data from SoSoValue.

Looks like the spot ETF netflow has been red recently | Source: SoSoValue

The spot ETFs here refer to investment vehicles that allow investors to gain indirect exposure to Bitcoin. As the above chart shows, the netflow related to such funds based in the United States has been negative during the last two weeks, indicating that a net amount of capital has been leaving the market.

These two weeks of outflows have come after six weeks of inflows. Whether the red netflows are the start of a new trend only remains to be seen.

BTC Price

Bitcoin briefly dipped under the $75,000 level during the weekend, but the coin has since surged back to $77,400.

The trend in the price of the coin over the last five days | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Related Questions

QWhat did Michael Saylor reveal about MicroStrategy's Bitcoin purchases this week?

AMichael Saylor revealed that MicroStrategy skipped out on Bitcoin accumulation this week, opting to buy bonds instead.

QWhat major purchase did MicroStrategy announce the previous Monday?

AThe previous Monday, MicroStrategy announced a mega-acquisition of 24,869 BTC, which cost the company $2.01 billion.

QWhat is MicroStrategy's total Bitcoin holding and cost basis per token according to the article?

AFollowing the recent purchase, MicroStrategy's holdings grew to 843,738 BTC, with a cost basis of $75,701 per token.

QWhat recent trend is mentioned regarding Bitcoin spot ETFs based in the United States?

ABitcoin spot ETFs based in the United States have seen their second-straight week of net outflows, indicating a net withdrawal of capital from the market.

QWhat is the price of Bitcoin at the end of the article's reporting period?

AAt the end of the reporting period, Bitcoin has surged back to $77,400 after briefly dipping under $75,000 during the weekend.

Related Reads

Coin & Stock Barometer: Bitcoin Miner MARA Holdings Spends Over $860,000 on Bulletproof Vehicle Services for Executives; Bitmine Included in Preliminary List for FTSE Russell 1000 Index (May 19)

Crypto Market Wrap & Key Corporate Updates (May 19) The crypto market saw a decline followed by a minor rebound, while U.S. crypto-related stocks fell broadly. In corporate news: **MARA Holdings**, a Bitcoin miner, disclosed spending over $869,000 on vehicle ballistic armor services for its CEO and CFO under its security program. The board cited higher risks associated with the company's public disclosure of holding substantial Bitcoin assets. According to BitcoinTreasuries.NET, Elon Musk's **SpaceX and Tesla** collectively hold 30,221 BTC ($2.3B), which would rank them as the fifth-largest public company holder if combined. **DDC Enterprise Limited** increased its Bitcoin holdings by 200 BTC, bringing its total to 2,583 BTC. The firm stated it plans to continue accumulating BTC based on liquidity, not short-term price movements. Bitcoin treasury company **Nakamoto** announced a 1-for-40 reverse stock split to regain compliance with Nasdaq's minimum bid price requirement. The company reported a Q1 2026 net loss of $238.8M, partly due to a $102.5M unrealized loss on its Bitcoin holdings. **Tether** acquired SoftBank's stake in **Twenty One Capital (XXI)**, increasing its control. Tether's CEO expressed strengthened confidence in XXI's long-term Bitcoin strategy. Fundstrat's **Tom Lee** stated that **Bitmine (BMNR)** has been included in the preliminary list for the FTSE Russell 1000 Index. Concurrently, two new wallets suspected to be linked to Bitmine withdrew 60,000 ETH ($126M) from Bitgo and Kraken. Solana treasury company **Solmate Infrastructure** announced a registered direct offering of shares to raise approximately $11.4 million. **AI Financial**, a WLFI treasury company, reported a Q1 2026 net loss of $271.5M and raised substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern, partly due to unrealized losses on its WLFI token holdings. **SUI Group** disclosed it holds over 108.7 million SUI tokens (~$115M), with its market cap to net asset value ratio at 0.91x. *Disclaimer: This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.*

marsbit11m ago

Coin & Stock Barometer: Bitcoin Miner MARA Holdings Spends Over $860,000 on Bulletproof Vehicle Services for Executives; Bitmine Included in Preliminary List for FTSE Russell 1000 Index (May 19)

marsbit11m ago

China's AI Fronts: From Yan'an to Midway

This article analyzes the competitive landscape of China's AI industry through a dual-front war analogy: the "Eastern Front" of business model competition and the "Western Front" of global strategic positioning. **The Eastern Front: The Scramble for Supply Lines and Monetization** The "Eastern Front" examines the contrasting strategies of three Chinese tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—in the face of AI's high marginal costs. Tencent integrates AI as a catalyst within its existing ecosystems (advertising, gaming, cloud) for monetization, prioritizing high-value scenarios over user growth. Alibaba bets on a full-stack, self-developed approach from chips to applications, aiming to control costs and ecosystem, though this requires immense patience and resources. ByteDance, with Doubao as its flagship, pursues a traditional traffic-driven, "super app" strategy but faces severe monetization challenges as its massive user base incurs unsustainable operational costs. The central challenge for all is building a reliable "supply line" (sustainable funding/profit) and achieving efficient monetization, moving beyond being mere "token factories." **The Western Front: "Preserving Land" vs. "Preserving People"** The "Western Front" frames a global strategic divergence. The U.S. model ("preserving land") focuses on closed-source, high-premium models (e.g., Anthropic) targeting lucrative enterprise markets. China's strategy ("preserving people") leverages open-source models (e.g., Alibaba's Qwen, DeepSeek) and extremely low pricing to attract global developers and capture long-tail markets, akin to a "surround the cities from the countryside" approach. The goal is to make Chinese models the default infrastructure, locking in future ecosystem value. However, the critical test is whether this open-source ecosystem can achieve a commercial闭环, converting developer adoption into tangible revenue (e.g., via cloud services), and bridging the monetization gap with Western models that charge for value, not just tokens. **Conclusion: The Long March from Factory to Brand** The article concludes that China's AI industry possesses technology, users, and scenarios but must integrate them to create and capture value. Its ultimate success depends on navigating both fronts: companies must establish sustainable monetization on the Eastern Front, while the industry's Western strategy must evolve from simply "preserving people" (developer adoption) to truly "preserving both people and land" — transforming open-source ecosystem dominance into commercial success and premium brand value. This journey from being a "token factory" to a "value highland" will require strategic patience and the ability to outlast competitors in a prolonged contest.

marsbit43m ago

China's AI Fronts: From Yan'an to Midway

marsbit43m ago

A History of Technological Evolution Powered by Electricity: Aluminum, Bitcoin, and AI

The journey from the Rockdale aluminum smelter in Texas to space-based data centers illustrates a core economic principle: whoever controls the cheapest electricity dictates the use of computing power. The evolution is clear. Old industrial sites with pre-existing, high-capacity power grids are being repurposed. In Rockdale, a former Alcoa plant now houses vast Bitcoin mining rigs, which are increasingly being replaced by AMD chips for AI training. The logic is purely financial: while smelting aluminum yields $0.17–0.27 per kWh and Bitcoin mining $0.05–0.11, AI inference on H100 GPUs generates $1.27–3.67 per kWh. Recent deals confirm the rush for power infrastructure. Riot Platforms leases space to AMD; TeraWulf bought an old Kentucky aluminum plant for its grid; NYDIG secured a New York site for its cheap hydropower to mine Bitcoin. As AI giants like Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Amazon aggressively expand, they now directly compete with crypto miners for the same industrial power resources, often outbidding them. This has led to a decline in Bitcoin's global hash rate and a wave of miner conversions to AI data centers. This "digital resource curse" extends globally. Gulf nations, long offering subsidized power to attract heavy industry like aluminum, are now pivoting to become AI and cloud computing hubs—exporting computational power instead of physical commodities. Similarly, Bhutan halted its sovereign Bitcoin mining to sell hydropower directly to India for a steadier return. The frontier is space. Projects like Starcloud plan orbital solar-powered data centers, leveraging constant sunlight and natural cooling, with Bitcoin mining as a secondary use for surplus power. Even consumer brands are transforming; Allbirds shifted from footwear to AI infrastructure, causing its stock to surge. Meanwhile, crypto projects like Bittensor, Render, and Akash propose a decentralized alternative, creating markets to aggregate distributed, idle computing resources from individual hardware. The underlying infrastructure—the power grid—remains constant. As profit margins shift, the facilities built upon it will continue to evolve, from aluminum to Bitcoin to AI and beyond, always chasing the highest yield per kilowatt-hour, whether in Texas, Abu Dhabi, or low Earth orbit.

marsbit52m ago

A History of Technological Evolution Powered by Electricity: Aluminum, Bitcoin, and AI

marsbit52m ago

Conquering is easy, governing is hard: Polymarket must bow to regulations to plant its flag globally

Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market platform, faces significant regulatory hurdles in its global expansion. Its "permissionless" model, which bypasses traditional identity and financial controls, has led to widespread crackdowns. India recently blocked the site, categorizing it as illegal online gambling under new 2025 laws. Brazil also banned it and similar platforms, though it simultaneously authorized a regulated, investor-only version on its national exchange. Across Europe, countries like France, Portugal, and the Netherlands are enforcing bans based on existing gambling and financial regulations. To enter key markets, Polymarket is adopting a pragmatic, compliant approach. In the U.S., it paid a $1.12 million fine, acquired a CFTC-licensed exchange, and now operates a regulated, KYC-mandatory platform for American users. It also secured a major investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), which will distribute its prediction data to institutional investors. In Japan, where gambling laws are strict, Polymarket has begun a long-term lobbying effort, aiming for legalization by 2030 through building institutional partnerships and community presence. Despite these challenges, the prediction market industry is booming, with global volume projected to surge from $51 billion to potentially $1 trillion by 2030. Polymarket's core dilemma remains: adapting its decentralized, anonymous model to fit within sovereign regulatory frameworks focused on licensing, consumer protection, and anti-money laundering rules. Its survival in each market depends on navigating this complex political and legal landscape.

marsbit55m ago

Conquering is easy, governing is hard: Polymarket must bow to regulations to plant its flag globally

marsbit55m ago

It's Easier to Conquer than to Govern: Polymarket Must Bend to Every Rule to Plant Its Flag Globally

Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market platform, is facing significant regulatory hurdles as it expands globally, illustrating the tension between permissionless, crypto-native platforms and national legal frameworks. The platform, which allows users to bet on event outcomes, was recently blocked in India under new online gambling laws and faces similar outright bans in Brazil and Ukraine, the latter citing moral objections to wagering on active war events. In Europe, countries like France, the Netherlands, and the UK are restricting access by enforcing existing gambling and financial derivatives regulations, forcing Polymarket to geo-block users or operate in view-only modes. To navigate this complex landscape, Polymarket is adopting a market-by-market, compliant strategy. In the U.S., it paid a $1.4 million CFTC fine, acquired a licensed exchange (QCEX) for $112 million, and now operates a regulated U.S. entity with strict KYC, abandoning anonymity. It also secured a major investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), which will distribute its prediction data to institutional investors. In Japan, a high-potential market, it has begun a long-term lobbying effort aiming for legalization by 2030, acknowledging the country's strict anti-gambling laws and slow regulatory processes. The article concludes that while the global prediction market is growing rapidly—projected to reach $2.4 trillion by 2030—Polymarket's core challenge is transforming its decentralized model to fit sovereign regulatory systems built on licensing, consumer protection, and anti-money laundering rules. Its survival depends on proving its legitimacy in each jurisdiction.

链捕手1h ago

It's Easier to Conquer than to Govern: Polymarket Must Bend to Every Rule to Plant Its Flag Globally

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片