MSCI’s Bitcoin snub is like penalizing Chevron for oil: Strategy CEO

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-11Last updated on 2025-12-11

Abstract

MSCI's proposal to exclude companies holding over 50% of their assets in Bitcoin and other digital assets from its index is criticized by Strategy CEO Phong Le as "misinformed and misguided." He argues this would be akin to excluding companies like Chevron for holding oil, Weyerhaeuser for timber, or Simon Property Group for real estate. Le emphasizes that Strategy is an operating company, not a fund, and warns that such a move would stifle innovation and unfairly bias against crypto as an asset class. The consultation period for MSCI's proposal ends Dec. 31, with a decision expected by Jan. 15.

Stock market index MSCI’s proposed exclusion of companies holding more than 50% of their crypto on their balance sheets would be akin to pushing out multinational energy companies like Chevron for holding oil, argues Strategy CEO Phong Le.

The MSCI Index announced in October that it was consulting with the investment community about whether to exclude Bitcoin and other digital asset treasury companies (DATs) that have the majority of their balance sheet in crypto.

During an interview with the Schwab Network on Wednesday, a streaming and market-analysis channel, Le said that he has “a lot of respect for the indexes,” but said the MSCI’s stance is “misinformed and misguided.”

He also said that oil giant Chevron has more than half of its assets in oil, timberland company Weyerhaeuser has a significant portion of its assets in wood, and Simon Property Group owns a substantial part of its assets in real estate, and none of them are facing exclusion.

“It seems very early to pick winners and choosers and stifle innovation in a category like this,” Le said.

“This would be like in the 1980s, saying the telecom company shouldn’t have built out cell towers and spectrum, or three years ago, saying AI companies shouldn’t be investing in LL labs and high-performance compute.”

MSCI’s stance is a mischaracterization: Strategy CEO

Le said that other parts of the MSCI proposal, such as characterizing Strategy and other digital asset companies as funds rather than operating companies, are also a mistake.

Some of the feedback to the proposal so far has been that DATs can “exhibit characteristics similar to investment funds, which are currently not eligible for index inclusion,” according to the MSCI.

“I’ve been CFO since 2015, Michael Saylor founded the company in 1989, we’ve been public since 1998, I work here day to day, and we are 100% an operating company legally from a corporate structure,” Le said.

Strategy letter says MSCI proposal isn’t neutral

Le’s comments come on the same day as Strategy released its letter to MSCI, pushing back on the proposal on the grounds that it would bias the MSCI against crypto as an asset class, rather than the index company acting as a neutral arbiter.

Related: Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury swells past 660,000 BTC after fresh $962M buy

The MSCI consultation is open until Dec. 31, with the conclusion to be made public on Jan. 15 next year, and any resulting changes coming into force during February.

Charlie Sherry, the Head of Finance at Australian crypto exchange BTC Markets, told Cointelegraph last month that the MSCI only puts changes like this into consultation when they’re already leaning toward implementation.

Magazine: Bitcoin whale Metaplanet ‘underwater’ but eyeing more BTC: Asia Express

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Goldman Sachs Research Report Analysis: Circle and USDC Are Moving Beyond the Crypto World, Cross-Border Payments and AI Agents Become New Battlegrounds

Goldman Sachs published a summary of its meeting with Circle Internet Group (issuer of USDC) on July 5th. The core takeaway is that stablecoins, led by USDC, are evolving from a crypto-native tool into foundational infrastructure for traditional finance and the AI economy. USDC's use cases are rapidly expanding beyond crypto trading into cross-border payments, e-commerce, capital market settlements, and notably, payments for AI agents. Circle's management emphasized that stablecoin growth is now decoupled from crypto market cycles, driven by this diversification. They outlined five key application layers and highlighted USDC's network effects, global liquidity depth, and regulatory compliance as competitive moats. Circle distinguishes USDC from bank-issued tokenized deposits, arguing the former is an open, internet-native system without bank credit risk. Strategically, Circle is building a broader fintech platform with its Arc Layer 1 blockchain, the Circle Payments Network for cross-border transfers, and an "Agentic Stack" to serve AI agent economies, where USDC already dominates. Regarding regulation, Circle views potential U.S. legislation like the CLARITY Act as a catalyst for growth rather than a constraint, expecting it to encourage broader institutional adoption and active usage. Goldman Sachs maintains a Neutral rating on Circle with a $96 price target, noting the company's shift from a pure stablecoin issuer to a financial infrastructure provider. Key risks include competition from USDT and potential earnings pressure from declining interest rates on its reserve assets.

marsbit45m ago

Goldman Sachs Research Report Analysis: Circle and USDC Are Moving Beyond the Crypto World, Cross-Border Payments and AI Agents Become New Battlegrounds

marsbit45m ago

The Robinhood Stock Tokens You Bought Are Just Debts from Jersey Island

The Robinhood stock tokens you buy are essentially debt securities issued by a shell company in Jersey, not real equity. These tokens merely track stock prices like NVIDIA or Apple but grant no shareholder rights like voting or dividends. If the underlying company fails, you have no claim on its assets. Instead, you hold a debt instrument from Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited, which promises returns based on stock performance. If this Jersey entity goes bankrupt, you become an unsecured creditor. This complex structure stems from Robinhood's past crisis during the 2021 GameStop short squeeze, where T+2 settlement caused liquidity issues. The blockchain-based tokens enable instant settlement, theoretically preventing such trading halts. The product is classified by the SEC as a "linked security" or structured note, carrying counterparty risk not borne by actual shareholders. It is available globally but excluded from the US, UK, and other major markets, while Robinhood offers a fully compliant, asset-backed token model in Europe under MiFID II. The system relies on oracles for pricing, which poses risks like manipulation and faulty liquidations seen in DeFi exploits. Robinhood profits from spreads and aims to become a full-chain settlement layer. Meanwhile, competitors like Ondo have launched SEC-registered, fully compliant equity tokens in the US with actual voting rights and dividends. Robinhood’s Jersey debt model appears as a transitional, regulatory-arbitrage product, aiming to capture market share ahead of future regulatory clarity.

Foresight News1h ago

The Robinhood Stock Tokens You Bought Are Just Debts from Jersey Island

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片