MSCI’s Bitcoin snub is like penalizing Chevron for oil: Strategy CEO

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-11Last updated on 2025-12-11

Abstract

MSCI's proposal to exclude companies holding over 50% of their assets in Bitcoin and other digital assets from its index is criticized by Strategy CEO Phong Le as "misinformed and misguided." He argues this would be akin to excluding companies like Chevron for holding oil, Weyerhaeuser for timber, or Simon Property Group for real estate. Le emphasizes that Strategy is an operating company, not a fund, and warns that such a move would stifle innovation and unfairly bias against crypto as an asset class. The consultation period for MSCI's proposal ends Dec. 31, with a decision expected by Jan. 15.

Stock market index MSCI’s proposed exclusion of companies holding more than 50% of their crypto on their balance sheets would be akin to pushing out multinational energy companies like Chevron for holding oil, argues Strategy CEO Phong Le.

The MSCI Index announced in October that it was consulting with the investment community about whether to exclude Bitcoin and other digital asset treasury companies (DATs) that have the majority of their balance sheet in crypto.

During an interview with the Schwab Network on Wednesday, a streaming and market-analysis channel, Le said that he has “a lot of respect for the indexes,” but said the MSCI’s stance is “misinformed and misguided.”

He also said that oil giant Chevron has more than half of its assets in oil, timberland company Weyerhaeuser has a significant portion of its assets in wood, and Simon Property Group owns a substantial part of its assets in real estate, and none of them are facing exclusion.

“It seems very early to pick winners and choosers and stifle innovation in a category like this,” Le said.

“This would be like in the 1980s, saying the telecom company shouldn’t have built out cell towers and spectrum, or three years ago, saying AI companies shouldn’t be investing in LL labs and high-performance compute.”

MSCI’s stance is a mischaracterization: Strategy CEO

Le said that other parts of the MSCI proposal, such as characterizing Strategy and other digital asset companies as funds rather than operating companies, are also a mistake.

Some of the feedback to the proposal so far has been that DATs can “exhibit characteristics similar to investment funds, which are currently not eligible for index inclusion,” according to the MSCI.

“I’ve been CFO since 2015, Michael Saylor founded the company in 1989, we’ve been public since 1998, I work here day to day, and we are 100% an operating company legally from a corporate structure,” Le said.

Strategy letter says MSCI proposal isn’t neutral

Le’s comments come on the same day as Strategy released its letter to MSCI, pushing back on the proposal on the grounds that it would bias the MSCI against crypto as an asset class, rather than the index company acting as a neutral arbiter.

Related: Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury swells past 660,000 BTC after fresh $962M buy

The MSCI consultation is open until Dec. 31, with the conclusion to be made public on Jan. 15 next year, and any resulting changes coming into force during February.

Charlie Sherry, the Head of Finance at Australian crypto exchange BTC Markets, told Cointelegraph last month that the MSCI only puts changes like this into consultation when they’re already leaning toward implementation.

Magazine: Bitcoin whale Metaplanet ‘underwater’ but eyeing more BTC: Asia Express

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

MiCA is coming for DeFi vaults, but regulation will be difficult

The European Commission is exploring whether to extend the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation to cover decentralized finance (DeFi) lending and borrowing, including lending vaults. These vaults, which channel billions into on-chain credit markets, present significant regulatory challenges because their decentralized structure doesn't map neatly onto existing financial frameworks. Their legal status is currently based on non-binding interpretations that they fall outside MiCA and EU fund rules. The article uses Morpho's decentralized lending protocol as an example, illustrating how responsibilities are divided among various participants (owner, curator, allocator, sentinel), making it difficult to identify a single "provider" to regulate. Experts warn that broadly categorizing "DeFi lending" could inadvertently capture vastly different structures. They argue that any regulatory approach should focus on the specific structure and control mechanisms of a vault, rather than using decentralization as a simple dividing line, and that DeFi lending may require a dedicated, carefully crafted framework distinct from traditional finance. The Commission's consultation closes on September 30, 2026. The core challenge for regulators is not just whether to regulate DeFi lending, but how to design rules that distinguish between different forms of on-chain lending and the entities that control them.

cointelegraph42m ago

MiCA is coming for DeFi vaults, but regulation will be difficult

cointelegraph42m ago

Grayscale Report: Financial Privacy in the AI Era, Why Zcash Should Not Be Overlooked?

Title: Grayscale Report: Financial Privacy in the AI Era – Why Zcash Should Not Be Overlooked The article argues that privacy is a fundamental, not niche, attribute of functional money. It highlights that technological shifts, like the rise of AI and stablecoins, are driving a new wave of public focus on financial privacy. Zcash, a decentralized digital currency similar to Bitcoin but with built-in privacy via zero-knowledge proofs, is positioned to address this need. Unlike transparent blockchains, Zcash offers users the option to conduct "shielded" transactions that hide sender, receiver, and amount while remaining verifiable. The report details Zcash's evolution, noting key upgrades that improved usability and security. It points to rising on-chain usage of privacy features as evidence of real demand. Currently, ZEC holds a minimal share (~0.4%) of the total crypto market cap. Grayscale suggests this reflects a market assumption that privacy is a marginal concern. The investment thesis hinges on a potential market re-evaluation: if privacy is recognized as a core monetary feature in an era of enhanced surveillance, Zcash's current valuation represents significant upside potential. Key risks discussed include regulatory challenges, historical trusted setup concerns for older pools (mitigated by newer protocols), quantum computing threats, and execution risks associated with future technical upgrades. The conclusion is that while the future scale of private digital currency is uncertain, the market currently prices in little chance of its value increasing substantially, presenting a potential opportunity for investors.

marsbit2h ago

Grayscale Report: Financial Privacy in the AI Era, Why Zcash Should Not Be Overlooked?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片