Morgan Stanley's First Bitcoin ETF One-Week Review: Defying the Trend to Attract Capital, a Signal of Institutional Accumulation

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-16Last updated on 2026-04-16

Abstract

Morgan Stanley launched its first spot Bitcoin ETF, the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT), on April 8, becoming the first major U.S. bank to issue such a product. With a competitive 0.14% annual fee—the lowest among U.S. Bitcoin ETFs—and backing from Coinbase and BNY Mellon, MSBT attracted $30.6 million in net inflows on its first day, defying a broader market outflow of $93.9 million. It continued to see positive inflows in subsequent days, even as other major funds experienced significant withdrawals. Amid a 44% Bitcoin price correction from its 2025 peak and four consecutive months of net outflows across Bitcoin ETFs, MSBT’s steady inflows suggest institutional accumulation at lower price levels. The fund, which now holds around 960 BTC, is positioned to capture long-term institutional interest, supported by Morgan Stanley’s wealth advisors who recommend up to 4% Bitcoin allocation for high-net-worth clients. Shortly after MSBT’s debut, Goldman Sachs filed for its own Bitcoin ETF—a covered call strategy product aimed at generating steady income while maintaining Bitcoin exposure. This move, along with MSBT’s successful launch, signals growing institutional engagement despite bearish market sentiment. Analysts project MSBT could reach $5 billion in AUM within a year, highlighting its role as a key indicator of Wall Street’s evolving stance on Bitcoin.

Author|jk

What is this ETF?

On April 8th, Morgan Stanley officially launched the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (ticker: MSBT) on the NYSE Arca platform, a subsidiary of the New York Stock Exchange, making it the first spot Bitcoin ETF in U.S. history to be issued under the name of a major commercial bank.

The fund has Coinbase serving as the cryptocurrency custodian and The Bank of New York Mellon handling cash and administrative duties. Its core competitive advantage lies in its annual fee of 0.14%. This is the lowest among all current U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, lower than BlackRock's IBIT at 0.25%, Grayscale Mini BTC at 0.15%, and Bitwise's BITB at 0.20%.

To briefly summarize Morgan Stanley: It is one of the top-tier investment banks and financial services companies in the United States, founded in New York in 1935; with a market capitalization of approximately $1.8 trillion, it is one of the Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIB), standing alongside Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Bank of America as a top Wall Street institution; it consistently ranks among the top three globally in areas such as IPO underwriting, M&A advisory, and stock brokerage.

First Week Inflow and Outflow Data

On the first day of trading (April 8th), MSBT recorded a net inflow of $30.6 million, with a trading volume of approximately $34 million and over 1.6 million shares traded. Notably, the entire Bitcoin ETF market saw a net outflow of $93.9 million that day, with Fidelity's FBTC and ARK 21Shares both experiencing significant outflows; only BlackRock's IBIT and MSBT recorded positive inflows against the trend. In other words, this ETF attracted capital against the trend amidst a market-wide sell-off. On April 9th, as market sentiment improved with news of U.S.-Iran ceasefire talks, the entire Bitcoin ETF market shifted to a net inflow of $304 million. MSBT continued to record a net inflow of $14.9 million, ranking third among all ETFs for the day, behind only BlackRock's IBIT ($269.3 million) and Fidelity's FBTC ($53.3 million).

Entering the following week (Monday, April 13th), the market weakened again, and the entire Bitcoin ETF market returned to a net outflow state. On Tuesday, April 14th, the situation was similar, with Fidelity's FBTC experiencing a single-day outflow as high as $229.2 million, leading to a total market net outflow of $291 million. However, MSBT recorded a positive inflow of $6.28 million, standing alongside BlackRock's IBIT and Bitwise's BITB as the only three mainstream Bitcoin ETFs to maintain net inflows that day.

Cumulative data: Since inception, it has accumulated a net inflow of $37.5 million, with fund AUM approximately $63.84 million (according to Morgan Stanley). SoSoValue data shows $70.12 million, holding about 960 BTC. The market price shows a 0.57% premium to NAV. Since inception, the market price return is +6.86%, and the NAV return is +6.24%.

Behind the Data: Institutions Accumulating at Bear Market Lows

The inflow data for MSBT, placed in the current market context, sends a very clear signal.

Bitcoin experienced a significant correction after hitting an all-time high of $126,198 in October 2025 and is currently oscillating in the $70,000-$75,000 range, a decline of approximately 44% from the peak. Throughout the first few months of 2026, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced four consecutive months of net outflows, with low market sentiment and retail investors exiting.

But what are institutions doing? MSBT's data provides a good example.

First, regarding the timing of the launch, Morgan Stanley prepared this product for about 18 months, ultimately choosing to launch it at a time when Bitcoin was nearly halved from its all-time high and market sentiment was widespread, rather than chasing the rally at the bull market top. Secondly, this ETF saw continuous inflows against the trend during a period of widespread pessimism. On April 13th and 14th, while the entire Bitcoin ETF market saw significant net outflows (a single-day outflow of $291 million on the 14th), MSBT still maintained positive inflows.

This indicates that the funds flowing into MSBT are not hot money transferred from other ETFs due to the lower fee rate.

Third, Morgan Stanley's internal recommended allocation is as high as 4%. The bank had previously advised clients to set their Bitcoin allocation between 0% and 4%. With the launch of MSBT, advisors now have a direct internal tool with the lowest fee. If Morgan Stanley's approximately 16,000 wealth advisors are actively promoting this allocation to high-net-worth clients, even a tiny percentage reallocation from the $7 trillion in client assets under management could bring in billions in sustained inflows. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas even predicts MSBT's AUM could reach $5 billion within a year.

Goldman Sachs is Also Preparing to Enter

Finally, just six days after MSBT's listing, on April 14th, Goldman Sachs announced it had applied to launch its first-ever proprietary Bitcoin ETF, becoming another major U.S. bank to enter the fray following Morgan Stanley.

However, Goldman's product is fundamentally different from MSBT. This fund, named the "Goldman Sachs Bitcoin Premium Income ETF," employs a Covered Call strategy, aiming to generate ongoing premium income while maintaining Bitcoin exposure. According to the application process, it is expected to launch as early as late June to early July 2026.

The fund will allocate at least 80% of its net assets to Bitcoin-linked instruments, including spot Bitcoin ETPs, related options, and Bitcoin ETP index options, while using a covered call strategy to generate monthly income. The specific operation is: the fund dynamically adjusts the proportion of options sold between 40% and 100% of its Bitcoin exposure—this range design allows the fund to continuously collect option premiums in sideways or mildly rising markets, but during significant Bitcoin rallies, the fund's performance will lag behind pure spot ETFs due to capped upside gains.

Simply put, this is a structure that "trades a portion of upside potential for stable cash flow"—regularly distributing option premiums to holders, suitable for investors who want exposure to the Bitcoin narrative but prioritize stable cash flow over full price appreciation. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas thus dubbed it "Boomer Candy," tailor-made for those traditional institutional investors who want a piece of the Bitcoin action but can't stomach the high volatility.

Goldman's entry immediately spurred a single-day market-wide inflow of $411.5 million. In other words, there's no need to panic in the bear market; top Wall Street institutions have begun collectively positioning themselves.

Conclusion

The first-week numbers for MSBT's listing don't appear particularly striking on the surface. The cumulative inflow of $37.5 million is微不足道 (negligible) compared to BlackRock IBIT's $55 billion size. However, the signal itself is very significant: a century-old institution managing $7 trillion in wealth, entering the market with the lowest fee in history during a period when Bitcoin had corrected 44% and market sentiment was extremely pessimistic, and relying on 16,000 advisors to continuously push allocations to high-net-worth clients. For readers focused on institutional movements, MSBT's weekly inflow data will become an important window into Wall Street's true stance going forward.

Related Questions

QWhat is the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and what makes it unique among US spot Bitcoin ETFs?

AThe Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) is the first spot Bitcoin ETF issued under the name of a major US commercial bank, launched by Morgan Stanley on the NYSE Arca platform. Its core competitive advantage is its 0.14% annual fee, which is the lowest among all US spot Bitcoin ETFs, lower than competitors like BlackRock's IBIT (0.25%) and Grayscale's mini BTC (0.15%).

QHow did the MSBT perform in terms of net inflows during its first week of trading, particularly in a challenging market?

AIn its first week, the MSBT demonstrated resilience by attracting net inflows even when the broader market was experiencing outflows. On its debut (April 8), it saw a net inflow of $30.6 million while the overall Bitcoin ETF market had a net outflow of $93.9 million. It continued this trend on subsequent days, including April 14, when it recorded a $6.28 million inflow against a total market outflow of $291 million.

QWhat signal does the launch and initial performance of the MSBT send about institutional behavior in the current Bitcoin market?

AThe launch and performance of the MSBT signal that major financial institutions like Morgan Stanley are using periods of market pessimism and price retracement (Bitcoin was down ~44% from its high) as an opportunity to build positions. This suggests a strategy of accumulation at lower price levels rather than chasing the market at its peak, indicating a long-term, strategic institutional approach to Bitcoin.

QFollowing Morgan Stanley ETF, what did Goldman Sachs announce and how does its proposed Bitcoin ETF differ?

ASix days after MSBT's launch, Goldman Sachs announced its application for its first proprietary Bitcoin ETF, named the 'Goldman Sachs Bitcoin Premium Income ETF'. Unlike a standard spot ETF like MSBT, it will employ a covered call strategy, aiming to generate ongoing premium income by selling options against its holdings. This structure sacrifices some potential upside gains for stable cash flow, targeting investors who want Bitcoin exposure but prefer lower volatility.

QWhat is the potential long-term significance of the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust beyond its initial inflow numbers?

ABeyond the initial $37.5 million in cumulative inflows, the long-term significance of MSBT lies in its potential to channel a massive pool of institutional and high-net-worth capital into Bitcoin. With Morgan Stanley's ~16,000 wealth advisors potentially recommending allocations of up to 4% from its $7 trillion in client assets, the fund could see sustained, billion-dollar inflows, making it a key indicator of Wall Street's genuine appetite for Bitcoin.

Related Reads

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit8m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit8m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片