Morgan Stanley's First Bitcoin ETF One-Week Review: Defying the Trend to Attract Capital, a Signal of Institutional Accumulation

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-04-16Last updated on 2026-04-16

Abstract

Morgan Stanley launched its first spot Bitcoin ETF, the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT), on April 8, becoming the first major U.S. bank to issue such a product. With the lowest annual fee among U.S. Bitcoin ETFs at 0.14%, it is custodied by Coinbase and administered by BNY Mellon. In its first week, MSBT saw consistent inflows despite overall market outflows. On its debut, it attracted $30.6 million while the broader Bitcoin ETF market bled $93.9 million. It continued to see inflows in subsequent days, even as major ETFs like Fidelity’s FBTC experienced significant outflows. By the end of the week, MSBT had accumulated $37.5 million in net inflows, with assets under management (AUM) around $64–70 million, holding roughly 960 BTC. The launch timing—amid a 44% Bitcoin price correction from its 2025 high—suggests institutional accumulation at lower levels. Morgan Stanley’s wealth advisors are reportedly recommending up to a 4% Bitcoin allocation to high-net-worth clients, signaling potential sustained inflows from its $7 trillion client assets. Shortly after, Goldman Sachs filed for its own Bitcoin ETF—a covered call strategy product aimed at generating income from option premiums, catering to yield-seeking institutional investors. Analysts see MSBT’s steady inflows as a sign of institutional confidence despite bearish sentiment, making it a key indicator of Wall Street’s growing engagement with Bitcoin.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author|jk

What is this ETF?

On April 8th, Morgan Stanley officially launched the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) on the NYSE Arca platform, a subsidiary of the New York Stock Exchange, becoming the first spot Bitcoin ETF in U.S. history issued under the name of a major commercial bank.

The fund has Coinbase as its cryptocurrency custodian and The Bank of New York Mellon responsible for cash and administrative management. Its core competitive advantage lies in its annual fee of 0.14%. This is the lowest among all current U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, lower than BlackRock's IBIT at 0.25%, Grayscale Mini BTC at 0.15%, and Bitwise's BITB at 0.20%.

A brief summary of Morgan Stanley: It is one of the top investment banks and financial services companies in the U.S., founded in New York in 1935; its market capitalization is approximately $1.8 trillion, and it is one of the Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIB), ranking alongside Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Bank of America as top Wall Street institutions; it consistently ranks among the top three globally in IPO underwriting, M&A advisory, stock brokerage, and other areas.

First Week Inflow and Outflow Data

On the first day of listing (April 8th), MSBT recorded a net inflow of $30.6 million, with a trading volume of approximately $34 million and over 1.6 million shares traded. Notably, the entire Bitcoin ETF market saw a net outflow of $93.9 million that day, with Fidelity's FBTC and ARK 21Shares experiencing significant outflows. Only BlackRock's IBIT and MSBT recorded positive inflows against the trend. In other words, this ETF attracted capital against the trend amidst a market-wide outflow. On April 9th, as news of U.S.-Iran ceasefire talks boosted market sentiment, the entire Bitcoin ETF market turned to a net inflow of $304 million. MSBT continued to record a net inflow of $14.9 million, ranking third among all ETFs that day, behind only BlackRock's IBIT ($269.3 million) and Fidelity's FBTC ($53.3 million).

Entering the second week (Monday, April 13th), the market weakened again, and the entire Bitcoin ETF market returned to a net outflow state. On Tuesday, April 14th, the situation was similar. Fidelity's FBTC saw a single-day outflow as high as $229.2 million, and the entire market had a net outflow of $291 million. However, MSBT recorded a positive inflow of $6.28 million, standing alongside BlackRock's IBIT and Bitwise's BITB as the only three mainstream Bitcoin ETFs that maintained net inflows that day.

Cumulative data: A cumulative net inflow of $37.5 million since inception, fund AUM is approximately $63.84 million (Morgan Stanley口径), SoSoValue data shows $70.12 million, holdings of about 960 BTC, a market price premium to NAV of 0.57%, with a market price return of +6.86% and an NAV return of +6.24% since inception.

Behind the Data: Institutions Accumulating at Low Points in a Bear Market

The inflow data for MSBT, placed in the current market context, sends a very clear signal.

Bitcoin experienced a significant correction after hitting an all-time high of $126,198 in October 2025 and is currently fluctuating in the $70,000-$75,000 range, a decline of about 44% from the peak. Throughout the first few months of 2026, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced four consecutive months of net outflows, with low market sentiment and retail investors exiting.

But what are institutions doing? MSBT's data provides a good example.

First, regarding the timing of the launch, Morgan Stanley prepared this product for about 18 months, ultimately choosing to launch it at a time when Bitcoin was nearly halved from its all-time high and market sentiment was generally pessimistic, rather than chasing the rally at the top of the bull market. Second, this ETF saw continuous inflows against the trend during a period of widespread pessimism. On April 13th and 14th, while the entire Bitcoin ETF market saw significant net outflows (a single-day outflow of $291 million on the 14th), MSBT still maintained positive inflows.

This indicates that the funds flowing into MSBT are not hot money transferred from other ETFs due to fees.

Third, Morgan Stanley's internal recommended holding ratio is as high as 4%. The bank had previously advised clients to set their Bitcoin allocation between 0% and 4%. With the launch of MSBT, advisors now have a direct internal tool with the lowest fees. If Morgan Stanley's approximately 16,000 wealth advisors are actively promoting allocations to high-net-worth clients, even a tiny percentage reallocation of the $7 trillion in client assets under management could bring in billions in sustained inflows. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas even predicts MSBT's AUM could reach $5 billion within a year.

Goldman Sachs Also Prepares to Enter

Finally, just six days after MSBT's listing, on April 14th, Goldman Sachs announced its application to launch its first-ever proprietary Bitcoin ETF, becoming another major U.S. bank to enter the fray following Morgan Stanley.

But Goldman's product is fundamentally different from MSBT. This fund, named the "Goldman Sachs Bitcoin Premium Income ETF," employs a Covered Call strategy, aiming to generate ongoing premium income by selling options while maintaining Bitcoin exposure. According to the application process, it is expected to launch as early as late June to early July 2026.

The fund will allocate at least 80% of its net assets to Bitcoin-linked instruments, including spot Bitcoin ETPs, related options, and Bitcoin ETP index options, while using a covered call strategy to generate monthly income. The specific operation is: the fund sells options dynamically adjusted between 40% and 100% of its Bitcoin exposure—this range design allows the fund to continuously collect option premiums in sideways or mildly rising markets, but during significant Bitcoin rallies, the fund's performance will lag behind pure spot ETFs due to capped upside gains.

Simply put, this is a structure that "trades some upside potential for stable cash flow"—regularly distributing option premiums to holders, suitable for investors who want to participate in the Bitcoin narrative but prioritize stable cash flow over full price appreciation. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas thus dubbed it "Boomer Candy," tailor-made for those traditional institutional investors who want a piece of the Bitcoin action but can't stomach the extreme volatility.

Goldman's entry immediately drove a single-day market-wide inflow of $411.5 million. This means, there's no need to panic in a bear market; Wall Street's top institutions have already begun collectively positioning themselves.

Conclusion

The first week numbers for MSBT's listing don't appear particularly striking. The cumulative inflow of $37.5 million is微不足道 compared to BlackRock's IBIT's $55 billion size. But the signal itself is very significant: a century-old institution managing $7 trillion in wealth, entering the market with the lowest fee in history during a 44% Bitcoin correction and极度 pessimistic market sentiment, and relying on 16,000 advisors to continuously push allocations to high-net-worth clients. For readers focused on institutional movements, MSBT's weekly inflow data will become an important window to observe Wall Street's true stance going forward.

Related Questions

QWhat is the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and what makes it unique among US spot Bitcoin ETFs?

AThe Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) is the first spot Bitcoin ETF issued under the name of a major US commercial bank, launched by Morgan Stanley on the NYSE Arca platform. Its most significant competitive advantage is its annual fee of 0.14%, which is the lowest among all US spot Bitcoin ETFs, lower than BlackRock's IBIT (0.25%), Grayscale Mini BTC (0.15%), and Bitwise's BITB (0.20%).

QHow did the MSBT perform in terms of net inflows during its first week of trading, particularly in the context of overall market outflows?

AIn its first week, the MSBT demonstrated resilience by attracting net inflows even when the broader market was experiencing outflows. On its first day (April 8), it recorded a net inflow of $30.6 million while the overall market saw a net outflow of $93.9 million. It continued this trend on subsequent days, such as April 14, when it had a net inflow of $6.28 million while the total market had a significant net outflow of $291 million.

QWhat signal does the launch and initial performance of the MSBT send about institutional behavior in the Bitcoin market?

AThe launch and performance of the MSBT signal that major financial institutions like Morgan Stanley are strategically building positions during a market downturn rather than chasing highs. By launching after a ~44% price correction from the all-time high and continuing to attract inflows during periods of broad market pessimism and outflows, it indicates a calculated, long-term institutional accumulation strategy at lower price levels.

QWhat is Goldman Sachs' proposed Bitcoin ETF and how does its strategy differ from the MSBT?

AGoldman Sachs has applied for its first proprietary Bitcoin ETF called the 'Goldman Sachs Bitcoin Premium Income ETF.' Unlike the straightforward spot Bitcoin strategy of the MSBT, Goldman's fund will employ a covered call options strategy. It aims to generate consistent premium income by selling call options on its Bitcoin holdings, trading off some potential upside price appreciation for stable cash flow. This structure is designed for investors seeking Bitcoin exposure but preferring lower volatility and regular income.

QWhat is the potential long-term significance of the MSBT's launch, according to the article's conclusion?

AThe article concludes that while the initial inflows into the MSBT may seem modest compared to giants like BlackRock's IBIT, its long-term significance is substantial. The fact that a century-old institution managing $7 trillion in client assets entered the market with the lowest fee during a period of extreme pessimism is a powerful signal. The weekly inflow data for MSBT will serve as a crucial window into Wall Street's genuine appetite for Bitcoin, as its vast network of financial advisors begins allocating a portion of their clients' portfolios to it.

Related Reads

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit16m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit16m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手23m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手23m ago

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit58m ago

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit58m ago

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1h ago

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1h ago

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1h ago

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片