MLCC Capacitor Price Increase: A Comprehensive Overview of Beneficiary Companies

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-25Last updated on 2026-05-25

Abstract

Recent teardown reports of Nvidia's next-generation AI chips have reignited investor interest in the MLCC (Multi-Layer Ceramic Capacitor) sector. Analysis of the Rubin architecture VR200 server reveals a 30% increase in MLCC count and a 182% surge in component value per rack compared to the previous generation, with GPU board usage nearly doubling. High-power, high-voltage hardware designs are driving massive adoption of high-end, high-withstand-voltage, and large-capacity MLCCs, exacerbating supply shortages. The global MLCC supply-demand balance remains tight. Leading Japanese and Korean manufacturers have successively raised prices across series, compounded by overseas capacity constraints and long-term customer order locks at major factories. Delivery lead times for high-end products now exceed 20 weeks, with capacity struggling to keep pace with surging orders. Demand drivers include AI servers, automotive electronics, and recovering consumer electronics, leading to both volume and price increases for MLCCs. The industry chain beneficiaries are outlined as follows: **1. MLCC Product Manufacturers:** Direct beneficiaries of price hikes. Key Chinese companies include Fenghua Advanced Technology (leading domestic player), Sanhuan Group (vertical integration from materials to products), and others like Hongyuan Electronics (military focus) and Torch Electron (specialty ceramics). **2. MLCC Raw Materials & Components:** The foundation of the supply chain. * **Release Fi...

Recently, a teardown report on NVIDIA's next-generation computing chips has reignited investment focus on the MLCC sector. The latest teardown of the Rubin architecture VR200 server rack by institutions revealed that compared to the previous generation, the number of MLCCs in the new rack increased significantly by 30%, with component value soaring 182%. The MLCC usage on a single GPU board nearly doubled. Hardware designs featuring high power consumption and high-voltage power supply necessitate the extensive adoption of high-voltage, high-capacity, high-end MLCC products, further widening the gap in essential industry demand.

The global MLCC supply-demand situation remains tight. Leading Japanese and Korean manufacturers have successively raised product prices, with multiple brands across various series experiencing price hikes of varying degrees. Coupled with limited overseas production capacity and major manufacturers' long-term capacity being locked in by customer long-term orders, the delivery lead time for high-end categories has currently extended to over twenty weeks, making it difficult for supply capacity to keep up with the surge in orders.

CITIC Securities research report states that with the continuous growth in AI server power, the quantity and quality requirements for chip inductors and chip capacitors serving GPUs/TPUs have significantly increased. Based on the projected shipments of GPUs/TPUs in 2027 and 2028, the chip inductor and chip capacitor industries are poised for explosive growth.

This article compiles a list of related companies as follows. It is recommended to like and bookmark for future research.

The related content is for logical interpretation and informational reference only, not investment advice. Follow me for daily analysis of core market thematic logic.

I. MLCC Product Side

This is the core segment directly benefiting from the MLCC price increase. Domestic leading manufacturers are the first to benefit, leveraging their production capacity and technological advantages.

Core Logic: Multiple demands such as AI servers, automotive electronics, and consumer electronics recovery are converging, driving simultaneous volume and price increases for MLCCs.

Related Companies:

1. Fenghua Advanced Technology: Domestic MLCC leader with leading production scale and technical level, actively expanding into high-capacitance and automotive-grade products.

2. Sanhuan Group: Masters core MLCC materials and manufacturing technologies, possessing advantages in ceramic powder and dielectric material fields.

3. Yunzhong Technology: Specializes in precision molds and core components for MLCCs, providing critical support for the industry.

4. Hongyuan Electronics: Holds a significant position in the military MLCC sector, benefiting from defense informationization construction.

5. Torch Electronics: Deeply involved in MLCCs for many years, technologically leading in special ceramic capacitors.

6. Zhenhua Technology: Its subsidiary Zhenhua Fu is a major domestic MLCC supplier, with products widely used in military and high-end electronics fields.

7. Dalicap: Specializes in RF microwave MLCCs, possessing competitiveness in the 5G and communications sectors.

II. MLCC Raw Materials Side

Raw materials are the foundation of the MLCC industry chain; their price increases and technological breakthroughs directly impact the industry landscape.

(I) Release Film

Core Logic: Release film is a key consumable in the casting process during MLCC production, used to carry ceramic slurry and be peeled off before sintering. Its flatness and high-temperature resistance directly affect MLCC yield rates. As the MLCC industry expands production and the proportion of high-capacitance products increases, so do the quality and stability requirements for release film.

Related Companies:

1. Jiemei Technology: Domestic leader in release film, deeply integrated with major MLCC manufacturers like Fenghua Advanced Technology and Sanhuan Group, and one of the few domestic companies capable of supplying high-end MLCC release film.

2. Shuangxing New Material: Engaged in optical-grade and electronic-grade film materials, with MLCC release film being one of its important business segments.

3. Sidike: Specializes in functional coating composite materials, with MLCC release film being one of its core products.

(II) Metal Powder

Core Logic: Metal powder (mainly nickel and copper powder) is the core material for MLCC internal electrodes. Its purity, particle size distribution, and sphericity directly determine MLCC electrical performance and reliability. As MLCCs develop towards miniaturization and higher capacitance, the technical requirements for metal powder are also increasing.

Related Companies:

1. Boqian New Materials: Leading domestic supplier of nano metal powders, with products widely used in MLCCs, electronic pastes, etc., and a core supplier to Fenghua Advanced Technology and Sanhuan Group.

2. Yue'an New Material: Specializes in carbonyl iron powder, nickel powder, and other metal powders, possessing strong competitiveness in MLCC internal electrode materials.

3. Gripm Advanced Materials: Leveraging the technical advantages of its parent research institute, it has a deep presence in electronic powder materials like copper and silver powder.

(III) Dielectric Ceramic Powder

Core Logic: Dielectric ceramic powder (mainly barium titanate-based ceramic powder) is the "heart" of an MLCC, determining product capacitance value, temperature stability, and voltage resistance. It is the segment with the highest technical barriers in the MLCC industry chain. High-capacitance and automotive-grade MLCCs impose extremely stringent requirements on the formulation and sintering processes of dielectric ceramic powder.

Related Companies:

1. Sinocera Functional Materials: A globally leading supplier of MLCC dielectric ceramic powder, mastering core formulations and sintering technologies. Its product range covers from standard to high-capacitance series, deeply integrated with international giants like Murata and Samsung Electro-Mechanics.

2. Sanhuan Group: Possesses a full industry chain layout from dielectric ceramic powder to finished MLCC products, producing high-purity barium titanate powder in-house, with significant cost and technological advantages.

3. Fenghua Advanced Technology: Engages in dielectric ceramic powder through its subsidiary Fenghua New Materials, securing its own production while also supplying some products externally.

4. Zhongci Electronic: Specializes in electronic ceramic materials and devices, with technical expertise in ceramic powders for high-frequency and high-voltage MLCCs.

Related Questions

QWhat is the key driver behind the recent surge in demand for high-end MLCCs, according to the article?

AThe key driver is the new generation of AI servers, specifically the increased power consumption and high-voltage power supply design of NVIDIA's Rubin architecture VR200 server, which necessitates the large-scale adoption of high-voltage-resistant, high-capacity, high-end MLCCs. The article states that the MLCC count in the new server rack increased by 30% and the component value soared by 182% compared to the previous generation.

QName at least two Chinese companies identified in the article as leaders in the MLCC manufacturing segment.

AFenghua Advanced Technology (风华高科) and Sanhuan Group (三环集团) are identified as core MLCC product manufacturers and domestic leaders.

QWhich material is described as the "heart" of an MLCC and has the highest technical barriers in the supply chain?

ADielectric ceramic powder, primarily barium titanate-based ceramic powder, is described as the "heart" of an MLCC and has the highest technical barriers. It determines the capacitor's capacitance, temperature stability, and voltage resistance.

QWhat are the two main reasons mentioned for the ongoing global tight supply of MLCCs?

AThe two main reasons are: 1) Leading Japanese and Korean manufacturers have raised prices. 2) Overseas production capacity is limited, and large manufacturers' future capacity has been locked in by long-term customer orders, leading to extended delivery cycles of over twenty weeks for high-end products.

QBesides MLCC product manufacturers, which two upstream raw material/supply chain segments are discussed in the article?

AThe article discusses the upstream segments of: 1) Release films (carrier films), a key consumable in the MLCC production process. 2) Metal powders (nickel, copper), the core material for internal electrodes. 3) Dielectric ceramic powders.

Related Reads

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手6h ago

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手6h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手7h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手7h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit7h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit7h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片