MakerDAO Transforms and Receives B- Credit Rating, Same Level as Congo Government Bonds

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-10Last updated on 2026-04-10

Abstract

MakerDAO, the decentralized finance lending protocol, and its subDAO Spark are undertaking measures to improve their credit rating in a bid to attract institutional capital. In August, S&P Global Ratings assigned a B- rating to MakerDAO’s USDS and DAI stablecoins, placing them in the "junk bond" category, equivalent to the government bonds of the Democratic Republic of Congo. To enhance its standing, the protocol plans to repackage debt backing USDS, isolate exposure to high-risk yield sources, and introduce junior capital vaults. These structural changes aim to align with traditional finance expectations and mitigate concerns over riskier assets like Ethena’s USDe, which previously received a high-risk weighting from S&P. Spark intends to launch first-loss capital vaults in Q2, offering higher risk but greater returns, similar to junior tranches in traditional structured finance. The move reflects a broader trend among DeFi protocols seeking credibility through ratings from established agencies like S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch, as well as emerging crypto-native firms like Credora. Improving credit ratings is increasingly critical as DeFi aims to capture capital from traditional financial institutions entering the blockchain space.

Author: DLNews

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: S&P gave Sky's USDS and DAI a B- rating in August last year, placing them on the same level as the government bonds of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which fall into the junk bond category. To attract institutional investors, Sky and its subDAO Spark are repackaging debt, isolating high-risk yield sources, and launching junior capital vaults. Credit ratings are becoming a key threshold for DeFi protocols to attract traditional financial capital.

  • Sky aims to improve its credit rating.
  • This DeFi lender received a B- rating from S&P Global Ratings in August.
  • Credit ratings are becoming increasingly important for DeFi protocols.

Sky and its subDAO Spark will repackage their products, minimize exposure to risky yield sources, and launch new capital vaults to enhance the credit rating of Sky for potential institutional investors.

In August, S&P Global Ratings gave this decentralized finance lender a B- credit rating, placing the protocol's USDS and DAI stablecoins on the same level as the government bonds of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

As the protocol seeks to attract more institutions, their goal is to improve this rating.

"We have reached a dominant position in the current market. We need to grow into TradFi," Sam MacPherson, CEO of Phoenix Labs, the core development team behind Spark, and a core contributor to Sky, told DL News in an interview at EthCC in Cannes.

"We are very focused on improving the weak points that more traditional institutional participants are concerned about," he said.

As blockchain technology becomes more accepted and adopted by the world's largest financial institutions, capital from the traditional financial world is pouring into DeFi.

DeFi protocols want to attract these new investors, and a good way to do this is to get a strong score from a respected rating agency.

Credit ratings indicate to investors the likelihood of a debt issuer defaulting on loans or other debt instruments due to bankruptcy. They are crucial for traditional financial companies because they help manage risk in financial markets.

High-yield bonds, often referred to as junk bonds, are any debt securities rated below BBB- by S&P Global Ratings or Fitch Ratings.

Senior and Junior

The first thing Sky and Spark plan to do is repackage the debt backing the USDS stablecoin.

Sky users can mint USDS by depositing crypto assets such as Ethereum and stablecoins into Sky Vaults, which use these deposits to earn yield. Users can then exchange USDS for sUSDS, the interest-bearing version of the token, through Spark. Users cannot mint more USDS than the value of their collateral, meaning the loans are overcollateralized.

"There will be USDS, which may have some exposure to high-yield products, but it will be packaged in a way that rating agencies are comfortable with the exposure," MacPherson said.

Meanwhile, Spark plans to isolate riskier, higher-yield assets into junior risk capital vaults in the second quarter.

"This will be a first-loss type of vault. Higher risk, but also higher returns," MacPherson said.

This type of structured financial product is common in traditional financial markets.

When borrowers repay debt, lenders holding so-called senior products are paid first, but typically with lower returns. This makes the products less risky and popular with conservative investors.

On the other hand, junior products are riskier because they are paid last, but offer higher yields to compensate for potential losses.

Additionally, MacPherson said that Sky and Spark have minimized exposure to USDe, a synthetic dollar issued by Ethena, another DeFi protocol.

S&P Global Ratings previously assigned a 1250% risk weight to USDe in its assessment of Sky due to the complex mechanism used to maintain the asset's value.

Rating Competition

Sky is not the only crypto project paying for credit ratings.

In 2022, Compound Finance's institutional arm, Compound Prime, also received a B- rating from S&P Global Ratings for its senior unsecured debt.

In addition to traditional rating agencies like S&P Global Ratings, Moody's Ratings, and Fitch Ratings, several crypto-native rating agencies are emerging.

Platforms like Credora provide credit analysis and risk assessment for DeFi lending, although the ratings they offer do not yet carry the same weight with investors as those from traditional agencies.

As of March 2026, Spark's stUSDS Vault has received a B+ rating, equivalent to BB- from traditional rating agencies.

For DeFi protocols, obtaining these ratings is "very important," MacPherson said.

"There is a lot of questionable underwriting going on right now, and there really needs to be a check on major vault lending markets," he said.

Updated, April 9: This article has been updated to distinguish between references to Sky and Sky subDAO Spark.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat credit rating did S&P Global Ratings assign to MakerDAO's USDS and DAI stablecoins, and how does it compare?

AS&P Global Ratings assigned a B- credit rating to MakerDAO's USDS and DAI stablecoins, which is on par with the government bonds of the Democratic Republic of Congo, placing them in the high-yield or 'junk' bond category.

QWhy is MakerDAO's subDAO Spark planning to introduce junior risk capital vaults?

ASpark plans to introduce junior risk capital vaults to isolate higher-risk, higher-yield assets, creating a first-loss type of vault. This structure aims to repackage debt in a way that satisfies rating agencies and attracts institutional investors by offering different risk-return profiles.

QWhat is the significance of credit ratings for DeFi protocols like MakerDAO according to the article?

ACredit ratings are becoming crucial for DeFi protocols as they seek to attract institutional capital from traditional finance. A strong rating signals the likelihood of default risk and helps manage risk in financial markets, making the protocol more appealing to conservative institutional investors.

QHow did S&P Global Ratings assess the risk weight for USDe, and why?

AS&P Global Ratings assigned a 1,250% risk weight to USDe, the synthetic dollar issued by Ethena, due to the complex mechanisms involved in maintaining its value, indicating it as a high-risk asset.

QWhich other DeFi protocol has received a credit rating from S&P Global Ratings, and what was it?

ACompound Finance's institutional arm, Compound Prime, received a B- rating from S&P Global Ratings for its senior unsecured debt in 2022, similar to MakerDAO's initial rating.

Related Reads

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit12m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit12m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit13m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit13m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News23m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News23m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit40m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit40m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片