Liquid staking under the lens after Nasdaq files JitoSOL ETF rule change – Details

ambcrypto2026-02-27 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-27 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Nasdaq has filed with the SEC to list the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF, which would be the first Solana spot ETF fully backed by a liquid staking token (LST). The fund aims to track the price of JitoSOL, a tradable asset users receive for staking SOL, allowing them to earn rewards without managing validators. The filing argues that JitoSOL is economically comparable to SOL, citing extremely high hourly price correlations (over 0.997) on major exchanges. This suggests the ETF introduces no new pricing risks beyond existing Solana ETFs. The SEC has 45 to 90 days to review the proposal. If approved, staking rewards would be reflected in the fund’s net asset value rather than distributed separately. This is the first U.S. filing for an LST-backed fund, though other products offering combined spot and staking exposure, like the REX-Osprey Solana ETF, already trade.

Nasdaq has submitted a filing to the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), proposing a rule change to list the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF. This fund was announced on 22 August 2025 as the first Solana [SOL] Spot ETF 100% backed by a liquid staking token (LST). It aims to track the price of JitoSOL, which it achieves using the MarketVector JitoSol VWAP Close Index.

In liquid staking, users receive a tradable asset in return for staking crypto. Users staking SOL receive JitoSOL in return. These can be traded while still earning the on-chain rewards from the staked SOL. These users don’t need to run validators or manage their on-chain staking.

Correlation data cited to show JitoSOL as analogous to SOL

The goal of the Nasdaq filing was to allow the listing and trading of the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF, which would hold JitoSOL directly. It submitted the proposal under Nasdaq Rule 5711(d), “which governs the listing and trading of Commodity-Based Trust Shares on the Exchange.”

The exchange relied on the “generic listing standards” the SEC approved in September. By demonstrating a high price alignment and correlation between JitoSOL and SOL, with hourly price correlations of approximately 0.9979 on OKX and 0.9985 on Coinbase, it argues that JitoSOL is economically comparable to SOL.

Therefore, the JitoSOL ETF does not bring new pricing risks not already present in the already-approved Solana ETF market.

The SEC’s review process gives the agency 45 days to approve or disapprove this proposal. This deadline can be extended to 90 days.

According to Jito Foundation president Brian Smith, staking rewards would not be distributed separately if the fund is approved. Instead, the rewards would reflect on the fund’s net asset value.

In August, JitoSOL had revealed that the Vaneck ETF filing was a result of months of collaborative policy outreach efforts with the SEC. This filing is still in the SEC’s exchange review stage. No liquid staking token fund is trading in the United States.

Other products that allow exposure to spot and staking rewards exist though. The REX-Osprey Solana + Staking ETF (SSK) began trading in early July. The REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK) was launched in September.

Grayscale introduced staking for its Ethereum and Solana ETFs in October too.

Final Summary

The Nasdaq filing to the SEC is aimed at allowing the listing and trading of the Vaneck JitoSOL.
High price alignment between JitoSOL and SOL means the two assets are economically comparable.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the purpose of the rule change filing submitted by Nasdaq to the SEC?

AThe purpose of the Nasdaq filing is to propose a rule change to allow the listing and trading of the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF, a fund that would be 100% backed by the liquid staking token JitoSOL.

QWhat is the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF designed to track, and how does it achieve this?

AThe Vaneck JitoSOL ETF is designed to track the price of JitoSOL, which it achieves by using the MarketVector JitoSol VWAP Close Index.

QWhat key data did Nasdaq cite in its filing to argue that JitoSOL is economically comparable to SOL?

ANasdaq cited high hourly price correlations of approximately 0.9979 on OKX and 0.9985 on Coinbase between JitoSOL and SOL to demonstrate their economic comparability.

QHow would staking rewards be handled for investors if the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF is approved?

AAccording to Jito Foundation president Brian Smith, staking rewards would not be distributed separately but would instead be reflected in the fund's net asset value.

QWhat is the current status of the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF filing and are there any similar funds trading in the U.S.?

AThe filing is currently in the SEC's exchange review stage, and no liquid staking token fund is currently trading in the United States.

İlgili Okumalar

Supply Chain, Energy, and Bloc Formation: Untangling the Core Threads of 2026 AI Investment

The core thesis for 2026 investment is a shift from traditional growth-inflation analysis towards a geopolitical framework of strategic blocs, supply chain reconfiguration, and capital expenditure (capex) direction. The US is moving from a global guarantor role towards a more bounded "camp system," reshaping trade, security, and technology flows. Key investment themes emerge from this realignment: production-capable US-aligned economies (e.g., Japan, South Korea), regional security focusing on Latin America, and the hard constraint of energy/grid capacity enabling reshoring. Europe's strength lies not in macro growth but in its high-quality "pick-and-shovel" industrial, electrical, and automation exporters serving the global capex cycle. AI remains the central US-China strategic battleground, driving massive investment in compute, power, and manufacturing stacks, with robotics gaining prominence. The investment implication is a rotation away from crowded US mega-cap tech momentum toward global beneficiaries of this restructuring: electrification equipment, industrial automation, energy storage, grid infrastructure, and select non-US markets. 2026 will be defined by investment intensity driven by geopolitical repositioning, not near-term commercial maturity.

marsbit42 dk önce

Supply Chain, Energy, and Bloc Formation: Untangling the Core Threads of 2026 AI Investment

marsbit42 dk önce

Appeals Court Rejects Sam Bankman-Fried Bid For New FTX Trial

A federal appeals court has rejected Sam Bankman-Fried's bid for a new trial, upholding his convictions in the FTX fraud case. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied defense claims of an unfair trial, sharply narrowing his legal options. His team could still petition the US Supreme Court. The ruling reinforces the legal precedent from one of crypto's most consequential cases, keeping focus on FTX's collapse, customer losses, and ongoing bankruptcy proceedings. For the market, the decision underscores the lasting impact of FTX on regulatory debates concerning exchange oversight, custody rules, and asset segregation as the industry works to rebuild trust.

bitcoinist47 dk önce

Appeals Court Rejects Sam Bankman-Fried Bid For New FTX Trial

bitcoinist47 dk önce

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbit1 saat önce

marsbit1 saat önce

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbit1 saat önce

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbit1 saat önce

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbit1 saat önce

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures