Kraken Slashes 150 Roles While Ramping Up AI Efficiency Measures

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-19Last updated on 2026-05-19

Abstract

Cryptocurrency exchange Kraken has laid off approximately 150 employees as part of efforts to increase operational efficiency through the adoption of artificial intelligence. This move has reportedly pushed back the company's planned U.S. initial public offering (IPO) timeline to at least 2027. Kraken had confidentially filed for an IPO in late 2025 but placed plans on hold earlier this year amid declining crypto market conditions. The layoffs, driven by AI integration, reflect a broader trend in the crypto industry, where firms including Coinbase, Gemini, Crypto.com, and Block have collectively cut thousands of jobs in 2026. A weaker market and reported quarterly losses have added to the sector's pressures. Kraken has not publicly commented on the job cuts or the revised IPO schedule.

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Kraken’s plan to go public in the US may have to wait until 2027. The crypto exchange, formally known as Payward, laid off about 150 workers last week, a move that has pushed back its initial public offering timeline by at least a year, Bloomberg reported, citing a person familiar with the matter.

A Year Of Shifting Plans

The company had been quietly working toward a public listing for months. Kraken filed confidentially with US regulators late last year, then put those plans on hold in March as crypto prices fell.

Co-CEO Arjun Sethi acknowledged the filing at a recent conference but stopped short of giving any dates. Now, according to reports, the IPO is unlikely before 2027.

The layoffs were driven by the company’s growing use of artificial intelligence across its operations. The source told Bloomberg that AI is being used more broadly throughout the business, though no further job cuts are currently planned.

Crypto Sector Feels The Pressure

Kraken is far from alone. Crypto companies have shed more than 5,000 jobs so far this year, with AI adoption cited repeatedly as a key driver. Coinbase cut 700 employees, about 14% of its workforce, on May 5.

Rival exchanges Gemini and Crypto.com let go of about 200 and 180 staff, respectively, earlier in the year. Block Inc. made the steepest cut of all, eliminating around 4,000 positions in February, roughly half its total headcount.

BTCUSD trading at $76,384 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

Crypto data firm Dune also announced layoffs this week, trimming a quarter of its staff as it refocused on core products.

A weaker market has added to the strain. Prices have been sliding since late 2025, and several publicly traded crypto firms reported losses in their first-quarter earnings.

What Comes Next For Kraken

The company has not publicly confirmed the layoffs or the revised IPO timeline. Reporters reached out to Kraken and did not receive a response before publication.

For now, Kraken appears to be tightening its operations while it waits for better conditions. Whether the market recovers fast enough to make 2027 a realistic window for a public debut remains to be seen.

The exchange is one of the largest in the US, and its listing has been closely watched across the industry.

Featured image from DL News, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian Encila

Follow

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Full Profile

Related Posts

South Korea’s KB Financial Completes Stablecoin Pilot As Lawmakers Press For Regulatory Framework

The XRP Asian Breakout: Japan And South Korea Lead The Charge

Analyst Predicts Bitcoin And Ethereum Price For The Rest Of 2026, What To Expect

Crypto Systems Could Be Outpaced By Quantum Tech By 2033, Says Hoskinson

CLARITY Act Could Unlock Wider Tech Growth In America, Says a16z

Crypto Confidence Surges As Italy’s Largest Bank Doubles Holdings In Q1

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, why did Kraken lay off approximately 150 employees and how is this related to its IPO plans?

AThe layoffs were driven by Kraken's growing use of artificial intelligence across its operations to improve efficiency. According to Bloomberg, citing a source, this move has pushed back the company's initial public offering timeline in the US by at least a year, making an IPO unlikely before 2027.

QWhich other major crypto companies are mentioned in the article as having conducted significant layoffs in 2026, and what was a common reason cited?

AThe article mentions that Coinbase cut 700 employees (about 14% of its workforce), Gemini let go of about 200 staff, Crypto.com laid off about 180 staff, and Block Inc. eliminated around 4,000 positions. A key driver cited for these job cuts across the crypto sector is the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI).

QWhat was the stated reason for crypto data firm Dune's layoffs announced the same week as the article?

ADune announced layoffs, trimming a quarter of its staff, as part of a refocus on its core products.

QWhat market condition, besides AI adoption, is adding strain to crypto companies according to the article?

AA weaker cryptocurrency market is adding to the strain. Prices have been sliding since late 2025, and several publicly traded crypto firms reported losses in their first-quarter earnings.

QHow did Kraken's co-CEO, Arjun Sethi, previously acknowledge the company's IPO plans, and has the company officially confirmed the reported timeline delay?

ACo-CEO Arjun Sethi acknowledged at a recent conference that Kraken had confidentially filed with US regulators but did not provide any specific dates. The company has not publicly confirmed the reported layoffs or the revised IPO timeline, and did not respond to requests for comment before the article's publication.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit49m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit49m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片