Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid Takes a Dig at Rate Cut, Will Cryptocurrencies Benefit?

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-12Last updated on 2026-02-12

Abstract

Kansas City Federal Reserve President Jeffrey Schmid supports maintaining the current lending rate, citing strong economic growth and persistent inflation. He argues that keeping rates high is necessary to curb spending and prevent inflation from rising further. Recent positive job data, including a drop in unemployment, supports the likelihood of a rate pause in the upcoming March 2026 meeting. While lower interest rates typically encourage investment in riskier assets like cryptocurrencies, the current high-rate environment may lead investors toward safer alternatives. Major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum are currently trading below key thresholds, though some institutions remain optimistic about the sector's long-term prospects.

Kansas City Federal Reserve President Jeffrey Schmid has come out in support of keeping the lending rate unchanged, at least in the next March meeting. He has based his statement on the grounds of the recent job data. It remains to be seen how investors react when allocating their funds to cryptocurrencies, which are going through turmoil at the moment.

Jeffrey Schmid on Rate Cut

Jeffrey Schmid, the President of Kansas City Federal Reserve, has noted the strong economic growth and sought a tighter monetary policy. He has said that the inflation is still running hot with demand exceeding the supply, adding that leaving interest rates high is needed to discourage spending and investment.

Jeffrey has further stated that further rate cuts could allow inflation to surge for longer, specifically at a time when the economy has a chance to grow above the trend. His statement comes at a time when US President Donald Trump has sought lower rates and Kevin Warsh, the next Fed Chair, has signalled that his policies would be in line with the same.

Rate Cut Paused?

A rate cut pause is plausible, given that the employment data have come out better than expected. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the nonfarm payroll rose by 130k in January 2026, and the unemployment rate dropped to 4.3% from 4.4%.

Oren Klachkin, a notable financial market economist, has said that an extended pause still seems likely. For a quick reference, the US Federal Reserve kept the lending rate unchanged in the January 2026 meeting.

The next meeting is scheduled in March 2026, when it is anticipated that the rate could again remain unchanged. Statements by Oren and Jeffery hint at a strong possibility of no rate cut in March 2026. However, a rate cut in June 2026 is still possible.

What’s For Cryptocurrencies?

Ideally, lower rates enable investors to allocate more funds to cryptocurrencies because their risk appetite is higher. Higher rates negate that intention. Thereby forcing investors to look for safer alternatives, like Gold and Silver at the moment.

Crypto prices are currently below the expected lines. BTC, for example, is trading at $68,029.09, below the $70k mark. ETH, similarly, is exchanging hands at $1,994.87 at the time of writing this article. The value is below the $3k mark.

Nevertheless, JPMorgan earlier expressed that it was bullish on cryptocurrencies following a reduction in the Bitcoin production cost to approximately $77k.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

OKX Ventures Invests in STBL To Launch RWA-Backed Stablecoin With Hamilton Lane and Securitize

TagsCryptocurrencyFederal Reserverate cut

Related Questions

QWhat is the stance of Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid on interest rate cuts, and why?

AJeffrey Schmid supports keeping the lending rate unchanged, at least for the upcoming March meeting. He bases this on strong economic growth, hot inflation with demand exceeding supply, and the belief that high rates are needed to discourage spending and investment to control inflation.

QAccording to the article, what recent economic data supports a potential pause in rate cuts?

AThe recent employment data supports a potential rate cut pause. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that nonfarm payrolls rose by 130k in January 2026, and the unemployment rate dropped to 4.3% from 4.4%.

QHow do interest rates theoretically affect investor behavior towards cryptocurrencies?

ALower interest rates typically encourage investors to allocate more funds to riskier assets like cryptocurrencies because their risk appetite is higher. Conversely, higher interest rates negate this intention, forcing investors to seek safer alternatives like gold and silver.

QWhat are the current price levels of BTC and ETH mentioned in the article?

AAt the time of writing, BTC was trading at $68,029.09, below the $70k mark. ETH was exchanging hands at $1,994.87, which is below the $3k mark.

QWhat was JPMorgan's outlook on cryptocurrencies, as cited in the article?

AJPMorgan expressed a bullish outlook on cryptocurrencies, citing a reduction in the Bitcoin production cost to approximately $77k.

Related Reads

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

On Thursday (June 11, U.S. Eastern Time), Wall Street staged a textbook V-shaped reversal. The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close above 50,000, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose 2.54% and 1.75%, respectively. The rally occurred despite the hottest PPI report in years, with May data showing a 6.5% year-on-year surge, the highest since 2022. The market ignored the inflation data, focusing instead on reports that former President Trump called off a planned strike on Iran, hinting at a potential multi-party peace agreement draft. This sparked a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling hopes that inflation may have peaked. Sector rotations were stark: previously battered AI hardware and cyclical stocks led the gains, while defensive sectors that hit record highs the prior day were sold off. Chip stocks like Micron and Intel saw sharp rebounds. In contrast, software giant Oracle plunged nearly 10% despite beating earnings, with concerns over cloud revenue and cash flow. Adobe also fell after hours despite raising guidance, as its CFO announced departure. The rally's sustainability is questioned, driven largely by social media posts about unconfirmed geopolitical developments. Inflation risks remain, with pipeline pressures still high. Meanwhile, the market's risk appetite faces a major test with SpaceX's historic IPO. Priced at $135 per share, it aims to raise ~$75 billion with a $1.75 trillion valuation, becoming the largest U.S. IPO ever. It will join the Nasdaq 100 in 15 days, triggering massive index fund buying. However, critics cite extreme valuation (88x sales) and market liquidity concerns.

marsbit24m ago

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

marsbit24m ago

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Mega IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare? The capital market in 2026 is witnessing a highly anticipated wave of tech IPOs, centered on SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Collectively valued at over $3.5 trillion, their potential listing represents one of the largest such waves in recent years. This raises concerns about market liquidity, valuation bubbles, and potential capital outflows from other assets like crypto. SpaceX's valuation narrative has shifted from rocket launches to becoming a global infrastructure play via its Starlink satellite network, which now drives most revenue. Despite ongoing losses, investors focus on its long-term growth potential. OpenAI and Anthropic represent the core productivity engines of generative AI. Their public listings would offer the first direct investment opportunity in large foundation model companies, potentially triggering a repricing within the AI sector. Market fears of a massive "capital drain" from these IPOs are likely overstated. Historical precedents like Alibaba and Saudi Aramco show that mega-listings primarily cause capital reallocation, not destruction, within the vast equities market. Systemic risk is rarely triggered by IPOs alone. For stock markets, short-term volatility and sector repricing are expected, especially for AI concept stocks. Long-term, these listings could reinforce the tech sector's importance. For crypto, direct competition for speculative capital exists, particularly affecting AI-themed tokens. However, crypto's trajectory remains more tied to its own cycles, macro liquidity, and Bitcoin ETF flows rather than a single IPO event. The real risk lies not in the listings themselves but in the sky-high growth expectations embedded in these valuations. If future revenue, profitability, or commercialization progress disappoints, significant valuation resets could follow, impacting high-growth tech stocks. Ultimately, the market's direction hinges on macroeconomic conditions and whether these companies can deliver on their ambitious promises.

链捕手40m ago

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

链捕手40m ago

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Title: Trillion-Dollar Valuations at Stake: Super IPOs of SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic – Tech Boom or Crypto Nightmare? TL;DR: A wave of mega-tech IPOs is approaching, featuring SpaceX (targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation), OpenAI (~$852B), and Anthropic (~$965B), with a combined potential valuation exceeding $3.5 trillion. This tests the market's pricing of innovation and sparks debate on liquidity impact. * **SpaceX**'s valuation is now driven more by its Starlink global communications infrastructure than its core rocket business. * **OpenAI & Anthropic** offer the first major public investment opportunities in foundational AI models, potentially repricing the entire AI sector. * Concerns about a market-wide "liquidity drain" are likely overblown; history shows large IPOs mainly cause fund reallocation, not disappearance, and rarely trigger systemic risk. * Crypto markets, especially some AI-themed tokens, may face short-term fund competition, but their long-term trajectory depends more on macro liquidity, regulation, and Bitcoin cycles. * The real risk lies not in the IPOs themselves, but in whether these companies can justify their sky-high valuations with future revenue growth and profitability. Unmet expectations could lead to significant repricing pressure. Ultimately, these IPOs represent a massive market pricing of next-gen tech infrastructure, not a prelude to a market crash. The broader market direction will be determined by macro conditions, corporate earnings, and risk appetite.

marsbit40m ago

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

marsbit40m ago

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片