Inside Bitwise’s Chainlink ETF filing and LINK’s 12% jump

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-07Last updated on 2026-01-07

Abstract

A document circulated on social media on January 6th claimed the SEC approved Bitwise’s Chainlink ETF, triggering market buzz. However, the filing was not an approval but an amended Form S-1 registration. Still, it drew investor attention, coinciding with a 12% surge in LINK’s price. The proposed ETF features a 0% management fee for the first three months on assets up to $500 million. It also saw $2.24 million in inflows, signaling strong institutional interest. Chainlink leads in developer activity with 191 contributions and has accumulated over $6.9 million in fees. Technically, LINK is approaching a key resistance zone at $15–16; a break above could target $20 or even $27. The coming days will be critical for its price direction.

A document circulated on social media on the 6th of January claiming the SEC approved Bitwise’s Chainlink ETF. The claim triggered market buzz, but the filing told a more nuanced story.

Still, the regulatory progress appeared to draw investor attention to Chainlink.

Regulatory filing, not approval

Bitwise’s Chainlink [LINK] ETF had not yet received formal SEC approval. Instead, the issuer filed an amended Form S-1 while completing Exchange Act registration steps.

The ETF’s shares were approved for listing by NYSE Arca and registered under Form 8-A. Trading can begin only after the SEC declares the S-1 effective.

Even so, the filing details fueled speculation. Bitwise proposed a 0% management fee for the first three months on assets up to $500 million.

That update coincided with LINK’s 12% price surge, reflecting heightened market interest rather than regulatory clearance.

LINK records $2.24 million in ETF inflows

Institutions continued to reduce LINK coins from the supply. The LINK ETF secured $2.24 million in inflows, signaling robust institutional interest.

This pointed to growing confidence in Chainlink’s Web3 capabilities, driven by the increasing adoption of its decentralized oracle network.

The rise in capital inflows showed investors are positioning for Chainlink’s future growth in the DeFi space.

Chainlink: Developers and fees back the narrative

Chainlink maintained its position at the top of DeFi charts, ranking 1st in developer activity with 191 contributions.

This continued surge in developer engagement was a sign of the growing adoption of Chainlink’s technology in decentralized applications. Furthermore, its Cumulative Fees surpassed $6.9 million, reflecting strong market confidence in its long-term utility.

In fact, the ongoing growth in developer activity and fees provided a solid foundation for LINK’s continued momentum.

With Chainlink securing its position as a top performer in the DeFi sector, the coming months could bring even more adoption, making LINK a key player in the evolving blockchain landscape.

Resistance loomed on the chart

Looking at the chart, LINK was approaching a crucial resistance zone at $15-$16.

If this resistance could be broken, a surge toward $20 could follow, which would open the door for a multi-year resistance level at $27. Technical indicators, including the RSI and MACD, suggested that LINK could experience explosive growth if the resistance level is breached.

With critical resistance levels nearing, the next few days would be decisive for LINK. Will it maintain its upward trajectory or face a short-term pullback?


Final Thoughts

  • Speculation around Bitwise’s ETF filing reframed sentiment around Chainlink without delivering final regulatory clearance.
  • If momentum holds, traders may stay focused on structure, flows, and follow-through rather than headlines alone.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason behind Chainlink's (LINK) 12% price surge mentioned in the article?

AThe price surge was primarily fueled by market speculation and heightened investor interest following Bitwise's amended ETF filing, not by an actual SEC approval.

QAccording to the article, what is the current status of the Bitwise Chainlink ETF?

AThe ETF has not received formal SEC approval. Bitwise filed an amended Form S-1 and the shares approved for listing, but trading can only begin after the SEC declares the S-1 effective.

QHow much in ETF inflows did LINK secure, and what does it signal?

ALINK secured $2.24 million in ETF inflows, which signals robust institutional interest and growing confidence in Chainlink's Web3 capabilities.

QWhat two key metrics does the article cite as evidence of strong fundamentals for Chainlink?

AThe article cites Chainlink's top ranking in developer activity (191 contributions) and its Cumulative Fees surpassing $6.9 million as evidence of strong fundamentals.

QWhat is the crucial price resistance zone that LINK was approaching, according to the technical analysis in the article?

ALINK was approaching a crucial resistance zone at $15-$16. A break above this level could potentially lead to a surge toward $20 and then a multi-year resistance level at $27.

Related Reads

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手1h ago

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手1h ago

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手1h ago

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片