How a $300 mln Ripple fund revealed Korea’s crypto obsession

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-14Last updated on 2025-12-14

Abstract

VivoPower International PLC has strategically partnered with Ripple Labs and South Korean asset manager Lean Ventures to create a $300 million investment vehicle targeting Ripple Labs shares. This capital-light initiative allows VivoPower to gain exposure to Ripple and XRP holdings without using its own balance-sheet capital, while generating an estimated $75 million in returns over three years. The move taps into South Korea’s strong institutional and retail demand for XRP-linked assets and aligns with the country’s recent regulatory shift, which now recognizes crypto firms as venture businesses, granting them tax benefits and state support. The announcement boosted VivoPower’s stock by 13%, reflecting market confidence in the strategy.

VivoPower International PLC has turned a standard joint venture agreement into a strategic expansion play.

It now connects Seoul’s institutional crypto markets with the private equity of Ripple Labs, one of the industry’s most prominent blockchain companies.

Additionally, its digital asset arm, Vivo Federation, has partnered with licensed South Korean asset manager Lean Ventures to create a dedicated investment vehicle.

This fund will target the purchase of $300 million in Ripple Labs shares, tapping directly into the strong retail and institutional demand for Ripple [XRP]-linked assets.

The initiative will advance within South Korea’s massive crypto market, a region often overlooked in Western coverage.

VivoPower X Ripple Labs

In this process, Seoul-based Lean Ventures will establish the dedicated investment vehicle and secure the capital.

This detail is crucial because it may involve firms like K-Weather, where VivoPower is finalizing a 20% stake, creating a potential synergy loop within its emerging South Korean ecosystem.

The deal’s most significant financial element is its fee structure.

Vivo Federation will receive a share of the management fees and performance carry, aiming to generate a net economic return of $75 million for VivoPower over three years.

Importantly, VivoPower gains full exposure to the future upside in Ripple Labs and its XRP holdings without committing any of its own balance-sheet capital, giving the company a capital-light path to substantial revenue.

Execs weigh in on the merger

Remarking on the same, Adam Traidman, Chairman of VivoPower’s Advisory Council, said,

“As we have noted previously, South Korea is a highly strategic market for Vivo Federation, given that it is the largest holder by value and number of XRP tokens in the world.”

Echoing similar sentiments, Chris Kim, Managing Partner of Lean Ventures, added,

“There is significant appetite in South Korea amongst institutional and retail investors seeking to gain exposure to Ripple Labs shares.”

The market has clearly signaled its approval, with VivoPower’s stock immediately climbing 13% to $2.88 following the announcement, demonstrating investor confidence in the firm’s strategic, fee-based pivot into digital assets.

This move by VivoPower and Lean Ventures is perfectly timed to capitalize on South Korea’s significant regulatory shift.

South Korea’s latest U-Turn

Effective from the 16th of September, Seoul is reversing a long-standing prohibition, allowing crypto trading and brokerage firms to qualify as venture companies under new revisions to the Venture Business Act.

By lifting a ban that had been in place since 2018, when regulators grouped digital assets with industries like gambling, the government is now providing digital asset firms access to critical tax incentives, financing programs, and state-backed investment support.

The Ministry of SMEs and Startups explicitly states that the policy shift aims to align South Korea with global regulatory trends, boost innovation in areas like smart contracts, and strengthen national competitiveness against rivals like the United States.

Thus, while the domestic crypto market remains dominated by giants like Upbit and Bithumb, the new rules are expected to accelerate innovation across the sector.


Final Thoughts

  • By targeting $300 million in Ripple Labs shares, VivoPower has engineered a capital-light model that delivers substantial upside while minimizing corporate risk.
  • This venture exposes a strategic blind spot in Western markets, where Ripple equity demand is high but access remains limited.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit52m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit52m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片