Here’s Why The XRP Price Will Shine In The New Year

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-12-23Last updated on 2025-12-23

Abstract

XRP has been on a downtrend after an earlier bullish cycle, but technical analysis suggests a potential for a significant price surge in the new year. According to analyst Dark Defender, the 3-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicates that the recent correction may be complete, with the RSI entering a zone historically associated with price rebounds. XRP is currently stabilizing near a key support level around $1.86–$1.90, aligning with the 1.618 Fibonacci extension. Elliott Wave Theory analysis further supports a bullish outlook, suggesting the recent decline is part of a corrective wave that could be followed by an impulsive Wave 5 rally. A breakout from this structure could propel XRP toward a target of $5.85, based on the 2.618 Fibonacci extension. Improved market sentiment around the holiday season and potential scarcity factors, such as Spot XRP ETFs, may also contribute to upward momentum in 2026.

XRP has spent the past few weeks on a downtrend after a bullish cycle earlier in the year, and this has left traders divided between caution and anticipation. However, as the year draws to a close, the interest in the altcoin is gradually changing from short-term volatility to what the new year could bring.

Interestingly, technical insights using the Relative Strength Index suggest that the current price action may be setting the stage for the token to shine in 2026, even if the market is not quite ready to reveal its hand just yet.

RSI Signals Point To A Completed Dip

One of the arguments supporting a bullish outlook comes from the 3-day Relative Strength Index highlighted by Dark Defender. According to the analyst, the RSI has already dropped into a zone that is known to indicate completed price corrections for XRP. This is because similar RSI conditions in 2024 were highlighted by periods before its price action returned decisively to the upside.

The chart accompanying his analysis shows XRP stabilizing near a horizontal support region, and this fits with the RSI flattening near oversold territory. According to the analyst, this type of structure suggests exhaustion on the sell side, even if price action continues to trade sideways in the next couple of days.

Source: Chart from Dark Defender on X

Speaking of stabilizing near a support region, XRP is currently trading around the $1.86 to $1.90 price range, which aligns closely with the 1.618 Fibonacci extension highlighted on the chart at approximately $1.8815. This support level aligns with a projection using the Elliott Wave Theory, and this contributes to the notion that the XRP price will rebound to the upside any time soon.

Building The Base For A Surge

In addition to the RSI momentum indicator, XRP’s price structure on the chart analyzed by Dark Defender supports the idea that the cryptocurrency is forming a base. The visual Elliott Wave count on the 3-day timeframe shows that the recent decline fits within a corrective sequence on sub-impulse wave 5. Interestingly, this sub-wave is an extension of a fourth impulse wave that traces its origin as far back as early 2025.

According to the Elliott Wave theory, this fourth impulse wave is expected to be followed by an impulsive Wave 5 that resolves to the upside. The projected impulse path on the chart shows how a confirmed breakout from this structure could push XRP into a massive rally. The price target in this case is around the 2.618 Fibonacci extension, which is marked at $5.85.

Dark Defender also linked this technical setup to timing, pointing out that the period around Christmas and the New Year could coincide with improving sentiment, and XRP will shine after the holidays. He also pointed to upcoming scarcity as another factor, which might be referring to the projected longer-term implications of Spot XRP ETFs.

XRP trading at $1.92 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat technical indicator is used to suggest that XRP's price correction may be completed, according to the article?

AThe 3-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) is used to suggest that XRP's price correction may be completed.

QAccording to the analyst Dark Defender, what price range is XRP currently stabilizing near, which aligns with a key Fibonacci level?

AXRP is currently stabilizing near the $1.86 to $1.90 price range, which aligns with the 1.618 Fibonacci extension level at approximately $1.8815.

QWhat is the projected price target for XRP if it breaks out from its current structure, based on Elliott Wave Theory?

AThe projected price target for XRP is around the 2.618 Fibonacci extension, which is marked at $5.85.

QBesides technical analysis, what two other factors does the article mention that could contribute to XRP's potential surge?

AThe article mentions improving sentiment around the Christmas and New Year holidays and upcoming scarcity, likely referring to the longer-term implications of Spot XRP ETFs.

QOn which timeframe does the chart analysis by Dark Defender show the Elliott Wave count that indicates a corrective sequence?

AThe Elliott Wave count is shown on the 3-day timeframe.

Related Reads

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

Anthropic has publicly detailed its security measures and a new "Cyber Jailbreak Severity" (CJS) framework following the controversial takedown of its Fable 5 model. The incident, triggered by simple user requests like counting letters or stating a profession, highlighted overzealous safety filters. Anthropic classifies cybersecurity-related prompts into four tiers: malicious activities (blocked), high-risk dual-use (like pentesting, with strict limits), low-risk dual-use (often blocked by "safety margin" errors), and harmless tasks (theoretically allowed but still frequently flagged). The company admits its classifiers are tuned for high sensitivity, leading to many false positives. The newly proposed CJS framework aims to objectively score the severity of AI "jailbreaks" (prompts that bypass safety rules) on a 0-10 scale across four dimensions: Capability Gain (does it grant new attack abilities?), Breadth (does it work across multiple attack types?), Weaponization Ease (how hard is it to turn into a real attack?), and Discoverability (how easy is it to find?). The score determines the response, from no action (CJS-0) to a potential model takedown (CJS-4). The score is context-dependent; for example, discovering a major unknown vulnerability today scores high, while asking about a well-known one scores low. The article raises concerns about Anthropic's dual role: it is both creating powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) and defining the rules (CJS) for judging their misuse, potentially giving it disproportionate influence. This is set against the backdrop of U.S. export controls, which for the first time directly restricted API access to a model (Fable 5), creating a "tiered" system where public models are heavily filtered and advanced ones are limited to vetted partners. The CJS framework is portrayed as potentially providing regulators with a metric to justify future API shutdowns. For users, the advice is to carefully phrase prompts, watch for signs of being downgraded to a weaker model, and wait indefinitely for promised filter improvements.

marsbit16m ago

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

marsbit16m ago

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

Arena, the AI model ranking platform, has become a $100 million annual revenue business just eight months after launching its commercial service. Originally a UC Berkeley open-source research project called Chatbot Arena, it created a "battle arena" where users blind-test and vote on anonymous AI model responses. This has generated a highly trusted, community-driven leaderboard based on over 10 million user evaluations and 82 million votes. Major AI companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic submit their flagship models to be ranked. The core monetization strategy is its AI Evaluations service, where model developers and large enterprises pay for in-depth performance analysis from Arena's massive user community. This provides real-world feedback on model strengths, weaknesses, and hallucinations—a critical service as models become more complex. The company, spun out from Berkeley in early 2025, quickly raised $100 million in seed funding at a $600 million valuation and later secured a $150 million Series A at a $1.7 billion valuation. The founding team includes CEO Anastasios Angelopoulos, a mathematician focused on rigorous model evaluation; CTO Wei-Lin Chiang, creator of the popular Vicuna chatbot; and co-founder Ion Stoica, a renowned Berkeley professor. Arena is now expanding beyond chat benchmarks into "Agent Mode," evaluating AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks like coding and research. The company's success illustrates the growing value and cost of independent, real-world AI model evaluation as the industry intensifies.

marsbit20m ago

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

marsbit20m ago

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

Vercel, known for its developer tools like Next.js, has launched 'skills', a package manager for AI coding agents, garnering 24,000 GitHub stars. It allows developers to add specialized capabilities, such as React best practices, to AI assistants like Claude Code or Cursor with a single command: `npx skills add <package>`. Skills are shareable, reusable modules that define an AI agent's behavior for specific tasks, moving beyond one-off prompt engineering towards standardized 'capability engineering'. A key innovation is the 'find-skills' skill, which acts as an internal search engine, allowing an agent to autonomously find and install the right skill for a user's request. This lowers the barrier for non-developers to leverage advanced AI coding assistance. However, this 'npm moment' for AI brings significant security risks. Security audits of thousands of skills on platforms like skills.sh and ClawHub found over 30% contained security flaws, with about 13% classified as severe. Threats include malicious scripts that can access local files and credentials, and prompt injection hidden within skill documentation. Unlike traditional code packages, skills blend instructions, code, and system access, posing a direct risk to user machines and data. Experts advise treating skills like code—reviewing them carefully before installation, especially their scripts, and being wary of excessive permissions. Ultimately, Vercel's initiative represents a major shift towards modular, reusable AI capabilities, but its rapid adoption requires developers to bring the same caution used in managing traditional software dependencies.

marsbit21m ago

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

marsbit21m ago

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

This article, titled "Claude Engineer Finally Releases Fable 5 'Skill-Burning' Guide, Teaching How to Bridge the Information Gap with Models," details a blog post by Claude Code engineer Thariq Shihipar. The core concept is the "information gap" or "unknowns"—the disconnect between a user's instructions (the "map") and the actual task requirements (the "territory"). The article argues that with powerful models like Claude Fable 5, work quality depends on the user's ability to identify and clarify these unknowns. Shihipar categorizes unknowns into four types: Known Knowns (explicit instructions), Known Unknowns (awareness of gaps), Unknown Knowns (implicit, unstated knowledge), and Unknown Unknowns (unforeseen issues). The blog provides a framework for addressing these gaps throughout the workflow: * **Before Implementation:** Techniques include "Blindspot Scanning" to uncover Unknown Unknowns, brainstorming/prototyping for visual or complex tasks, having Claude ask clarifying questions, using reference code/examples, and creating implementation plans. * **During Implementation:** Maintaining an "implementation notes" file for Claude to document deviations and decisions made due to encountered edge cases. * **After Implementation:** Creating summary documents for review and having Claude generate quizzes to ensure the user fully understands the completed changes. The article concludes that as models become more capable, the key to success is systematically discovering and defining these unknowns through low-cost methods like prototyping and planning, allowing for more effective collaboration.

marsbit26m ago

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

marsbit26m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片