From 'Cash Incinerator' to 'Money Printing Machine': ChangXin Technology's Remarkable Turnaround, Raking in 50 Billion in Half a Year

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-18Last updated on 2026-05-18

Abstract

Changxin Technology: From "Money Incinerator" to "Money Printer" in Six Months Changxin Technology, a Chinese DRAM chipmaker once dubbed a "money incinerator" for years of massive losses, has staged a staggering financial turnaround. Its updated IPO prospectus reveals explosive 2026 first-half results: revenue forecast of 110-120 billion yuan (up 613-677% year-on-year) and net profit of 50-57 billion yuan (up 2244-2544% year-on-year). This half-year profit rivals that of major state-owned energy giants. The reversal stems from a historic memory chip super-cycle fueled by AI. Massive demand from AI servers, consuming 8-10x more DRAM than traditional servers, coupled with a supply crunch as major players shift capacity to premium HBM, has driven DRAM prices to multi-year highs. As China's only large-scale DRAM IDM (integrated design and manufacturing) firm, Changxin was positioned to capitalize. With upgraded product lines (DDR5/LPDDR5) and high capacity utilization, it achieved both volume and price increases, doubling its global market share to 7.67% in just half a year. This follows a decade of heavy investment and losses totaling 36.65 billion yuan, a gamble led by Chairman Zhu Yiming, who famously vowed to take no salary until the company was profitable. The IPO aims to raise 29.5 billion yuan, implying a valuation that some analysts project could reach 1-2 trillion yuan long-term. Debate persists over the sustainability of profits given DRAM's cyclicality, but support...

Original Author: Xu Chao

Original Source: Wall Street News

One quarter's profit of 24.7 billion yuan, a half-year profit approaching 57 billion yuan — this chip company, once a perennial loss-maker mockingly called a "cash incinerator" by the market, is staging the most astonishing profit turnaround in China's tech history.

On May 17th, ChangXin Technology updated its IPO prospectus on the STAR Market. A set of numbers shocked the entire capital market: In the first quarter of 2026, the company's revenue reached 50.8 billion yuan, skyrocketing 719% year-over-year; net profit attributable to the parent company after non-recurring gains/losses was 26.34 billion yuan, soaring 1993.41% year-over-year; the company expects revenue for the first half of this year to be between 110 and 120 billion yuan, a year-over-year increase of 612.53% to 677.31%; net profit attributable to the parent company is projected to be between 50 and 57 billion yuan, up 2244% to 2544% year-over-year.

Just how extraordinary is this report card? A horizontal comparison makes it clear.

Among non-financial A-share companies, only three—PetroChina, China Mobile, and CNOOC—had annual net profits exceeding 100 billion yuan in 2025; Kweichow Moutai was 80+ billion yuan; CATL was 70+ billion yuan; the sixth-ranked CHN Energy Group was just 52.9 billion yuan. ChangXin Technology, with its net profit attributable to the parent company for just half a year, has already reached a level comparable to CHN Energy Group, placing it among the top six non-financial A-share companies.

Even more astonishing is that if this data is extrapolated linearly, ChangXin Technology's net profit for 2026 is expected to potentially exceed 100 billion yuan. Thus, this chip company's annual profitability is catching up to the profit scale of those former oil giants.

However, just over a year ago, this company was a veritable "cash incinerator."

The Abyss of Past Losses: Burning Through 36.6 Billion in Three Years

Looking at ChangXin Technology's historical public financial data: a loss of 16.34 billion yuan in 2023, a loss of 7.145 billion yuan in 2024, and cumulative losses reaching 36.65 billion yuan as of December 31, 2025. Over nearly a decade, ChangXin Technology poured almost every cent it raised into the bottomless pit of chip manufacturing.

Now, how did this "cash incinerator" transform into a "money printing machine" earning nearly 400 million yuan per day in less than half a year?

The answer lies in two key phrases: AI and the chip shortage.

The Epic Super Cycle: AI is "Devouring" Memory

The world is experiencing an epic-level memory chip cycle.

The root of this super boom cycle is the "violent consumption" of memory by AI large models.

Every model inference is essentially a massive data grab between GPUs and memory. The demand for DRAM from a single AI server is 8 to 10 times that of a traditional server. As global cloud providers and AI computing infrastructure construction continues to accelerate, DRAM demand is experiencing structural explosion.

Simultaneously, the three major camps—Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron—are shifting a significant portion of their advanced capacity to higher-margin HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), severely constricting production line resources for general-purpose chips like DDR4 and DDR5.

This extreme supply-demand mismatch has driven DRAM prices to historic highs.

TrendForce data shows that DRAM contract prices surged 93% to 98% quarter-over-quarter in Q1 2026; Q2 is still expected to maintain gains of 58% to 63%. Data from the National Development and Reform Commission's Price Monitoring Center shows that as of January 2026, mainstream DRAM product prices had hit their highest levels since 2016. All 2026 production capacity from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron has reportedly been sold out.

Industry institutions predict this memory upcycle could last until 2030, with a supply gap exceeding 20%.

Optimal Volume & Price: ChangXin Technology Hit the Node

In this epic memory super cycle, ChangXin Technology not only caught the tailwind but also maximized the realization of industry dividends through its years of strategic positioning.

Founded in 2016, ChangXin Technology is currently the only true IDM enterprise in mainland China achieving large-scale DRAM production—meaning it covers the entire industrial chain: design, manufacturing, and packaging/testing. The company has three 12-inch wafer fabs in Beijing and Hefei, with capacity utilization climbing to 94.63% in 2025.

On the product front, ChangXin Technology has completed a full upgrade from DDR4 to DDR5, and from LPDDR4X to LPDDR5/5X. The continuous promotion of high-end products directly amplified the profit elasticity brought by price increases.

In market share, according to Omdia data, based on DRAM sales in Q4 2025, ChangXin Technology's global market share had increased to 7.67%, ranking fourth globally and first in China. From 3.97% in Q2 2025 to 7.67% in Q4 2025, its market share nearly doubled in just half a year.

The result is: simultaneous volume growth and price increases, leading to an explosive profit surge.

Zhu Yiming's Decade-Long Gamble: No Salary Until Profitable

ChangXin Technology's journey to this point is inseparable from one key figure: Chairman Zhu Yiming.

As the founder of Gigadevice, Zhu Yiming made a decision in 2016 that the industry couldn't comprehend — he abandoned the stable path of a chip design company and staked everything on establishing ChangXin Technology in Hefei, betting heavily on domestic DRAM.

How difficult was this path? DRAM is the most fiercely competitive chip category globally, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron collectively holding over 90% of the global market share, leaving almost no room for new entrants. Even more critical, DRAM manufacturing is extremely capital-intensive, with 12-inch wafer fabs requiring investments of hundreds of millions or billions of dollars. For a long time, ChangXin was essentially using money to "fill a hole."

Zhu Yiming made a military-style pledge back then: He would not receive a single yuan in salary or bonus until ChangXin became profitable.

That promise has been significantly over-fulfilled.

Valuation Debate: One Trillion or Two Trillion?

With such explosive performance, what is ChangXin Technology really worth?

According to the current IPO plan, ChangXin Technology plans to raise 29.5 billion yuan on the STAR Market, with a post-issue share capital of no less than 10%, implying a valuation of approximately 295 billion yuan. This planned IPO fundraising of 29.5 billion yuan would also be the highest in STAR Market history (SMIC planned to raise 20.7 billion yuan in 2020, but actually raised over 53.2 billion).

Current market valuation expectations for ChangXin Technology are around 1 trillion yuan in the short term and 2 trillion yuan in the long term. Based on the projected 100 billion yuan net profit attributable to the parent company by the end of 2026, using relatively conservative valuation estimates, a market capitalization breakthrough of one trillion yuan also has ample support.

Of course, controversy also exists.

The cyclicality of DRAM is an unavoidable historical pattern — ChangXin Technology was still suffering massive losses last year, is exploding with profits this year, and once the super cycle ends and prices fall, its performance could contract significantly at any time.

However, some argue that the core logic of this cycle has shifted from "short-term peaks in consumer electronics" to "structural demand from AI," making its sustainability far exceed that of past cycles. Additionally, the scarcity premium of ChangXin Technology as the domestic DRAM "lone champion" is a factor that cannot be ignored in pricing.

A Textbook Financial Turnaround

From cumulative losses of 36.6 billion yuan to raking in 50 billion yuan in half a year, ChangXin Technology has completed a textbook financial turnaround in less than half a year.

But behind this turnaround lies capital investment, technological accumulation, and strategic persistence maintained day after day for ten years. What Zhu Yiming and the ChangXin team bet on was not just an industry cycle, but also the industrial imperative of China securing a place on the global DRAM map.

The report card of earning nearly 400 million yuan per day is a gift from the tailwind and also the reward for a decade of grinding.

When ChangXin Technology finally rings the bell on its IPO day, the answer it gives to the capital market will perhaps be more convincing than any analyst report.

Related Questions

QWhat is the primary reason behind Changxin Technology's dramatic turnaround from being a 'money-lestroying machine' to a 'money-printing machine'?

AThe primary reason is Changxin Technology catching an epic, super-cycle boom in the DRAM memory chip market, driven by explosive AI demand and a severe supply shortage, which led to unprecedented price increases and allowed the company to benefit from both volume and price growth.

QWhat key personal commitment did Chairman Zhu Yiming make regarding his compensation during Changxin Technology's unprofitable years?

AChairman Zhu Yiming pledged not to receive any salary or bonuses until Changxin Technology became profitable.

QAccording to the article, how does the current DRAM super-cycle differ fundamentally from previous cycles?

AThe core logic of the current cycle has shifted from temporary consumer electronics demand to long-term, structural demand driven by AI infrastructure and computing needs, suggesting potentially greater sustainability than previous cycles.

QWhat unique business model advantage does Changxin Technology possess in the Chinese semiconductor landscape?

AChangxin Technology is the only IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) company in Mainland China that has achieved large-scale mass production of DRAM, meaning it controls the entire process from design and manufacturing to packaging and testing.

QWhat are the two main opposing viewpoints regarding Changxin Technology's future valuation, as presented in the article?

AOne viewpoint highlights the unavoidable historical cyclicality of the DRAM industry, warning that profits could sharply contract when the super-cycle ends. The opposing viewpoint emphasizes the structural shift towards sustained AI demand and the company's strategic 'national champion' scarcity premium as a unique domestic DRAM producer.

Related Reads

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbit1h ago

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbit1h ago

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbit1h ago

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbit1h ago

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbit1h ago

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片