Finland to "cut" cables: Russian operators will have to look for new internet routes

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-29Last updated on 2026-07-29

Abstract

Finland will cut the optical fiber communication cables attached to its power transmission line pylons along the border with Russia by 2027, according to its energy company Fingrid. This follows the 2022 halt of electricity imports from Russia, making the infrastructure economically unviable to maintain solely for telecom needs. Currently, about 60-70% of Russia's international internet traffic transits through Finland, with up to 30% of these lines running along the power lines in question. Russian telecom operators are negotiating with Finnish counterparts for alternative routes. Potential backups include lines through Belarus, Baltic states, and submarine cables in the Baltic Sea. While no major impact on user traffic is expected, potential effects include rerouting, reduced network redundancy, and increased latency, especially for users in northwestern and European Russia. An AI analysis notes that shifting to submarine cables introduces new risks, as they are vulnerable to anchor damage and lengthy repairs. This technical move occurs alongside broader trends toward digital autonomy in Russia, raising questions about the future reliability of external internet channels.

The Finnish energy company Fingrid has notified Russian telecom operators that starting in 2027, it will stop servicing the power line supports on which the fiber-optic communication lines between Russia and Finland are attached. According to sources in the telecom market, the cable is planned to be cut, and the supports themselves are to be dismantled.

Reason — halt in power supplies

The formal reason was the cessation of electricity supplies from Russia to Finland back in 2022 — due to payment stoppages. Since then, maintaining the supports solely for the needs of telecom operators has lost economic sense for both Fingrid and Rosseti.

Rosseti clarified that the section of the 400 kV line belonging to the company — Vyborgskaya substation — Yllikkälä / Kymi substation — has been operating in a limited mode since 2022: power transmission and the transfer of technological information via it are not being carried out. This infrastructure is planned to be used for solving domestic power grid tasks.

How significant is this communication channel

According to expert estimates, after 2022, about 60–70% of Russia's international internet traffic transits through Finland. At the same time, up to 30% of all communication lines with this country run along power lines. The remaining traffic goes via the following routes:

  • lines along the railway;
  • submarine fiber-optic communication lines.

What will happen to the traffic

Russian operators are already negotiating with Finnish telecom companies about alternative routes. Sources point to backup directions through Belarus, the Baltic states, as well as through submarine cable systems in the Baltic Sea. No significant impact on subscriber traffic is expected, however, the following cannot be ruled out:

  • reconfiguration of routing;
  • reduction in the level of network redundancy;
  • increased delays when accessing foreign resources — primarily in the Northwestern Federal District and the European part of Russia.

The situation is unfolding against the backdrop of Russia's international traffic remaining noticeably dependent on the Finnish route for several years now, despite the political tension between the countries. The decision by Fingrid formalizes what has been happening de facto since 2022: infrastructure originally built for energy cooperation is gradually losing its connection to its original purpose.

For operators, the key issue remains not the fact of dismantling the supports, but the timing and reliability of the transition to backup channels — this will determine whether end users notice a change in the quality of connection with foreign services.

AI Opinion

From the perspective of machine data analysis, shifting traffic to backup routes does not eliminate the main technical risk. The Baltic submarine cables themselves are vulnerable: over the past two years, several trunk lines have been damaged by ship anchors, with repairs taking weeks. Relying on sea lines as a replacement for overland power lines essentially swaps one narrow channel for another, less predictable one.

The macroeconomic context adds another dimension. The dismantling of Finnish infrastructure coincides with a push for digital autonomy: a whitelist system for mobile internet has already been launched in several regions. The technical isolation of traffic and the physical isolation of communication channels are developing in parallel, although formally they are not linked.

Will redundancy through the Baltic Sea remain a reliable solution, or is the country moving towards a scenario where external channels become the exception, not the rule?

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason for Fingrid's decision to dismantle the power line poles supporting the fiber optic cables between Russia and Finland?

AThe formal reason is the cessation of electricity supplies from Russia to Finland in 2022 due to payment stoppages. This made the maintenance of the poles solely for telecommunication purposes economically unfeasible for both Fingrid and Russian Grids (Rosseti).

QWhat percentage of Russia's foreign internet traffic was transited via Finland after 2022, and how much of that was via the power lines?

AAfter 2022, approximately 60–70% of Russia's foreign internet traffic was transited via Finland. Of all communication lines with Finland, the power lines accounted for up to 30%.

QWhat alternative routes are Russian operators considering for internet traffic after the potential cable cut?

ARussian operators are negotiating with Finnish telecom companies for alternative routes. Potential routes include transit through Belarus, the Baltic countries, and submarine cable systems in the Baltic Sea.

QWhat potential impacts on internet users in Russia are mentioned in the article due to the rerouting of traffic?

AThe potential impacts include a reconfiguration of routing, a reduction in network redundancy levels, and increased latency when accessing foreign resources, particularly in the Northwestern Federal District and the European part of Russia.

QAccording to the 'AI Opinion' section, what is the main technical risk of shifting traffic to alternative submarine cables in the Baltic Sea?

AThe main technical risk is the inherent vulnerability of submarine cables themselves. In the past two years, several main lines in the Baltic have been damaged by ship anchors, and repairs have taken weeks. Relying on sea lines effectively replaces one narrow channel with another, less predictable one.

Related Reads

Bank of Korea Reveals Results of Tokenized Deposit Testing

The Bank of Korea has announced the results of its pilot test for tokenized deposits. Involving 28 central banks and international financial organizations, the project saw participation from major South Korean banks including KB Kookmin Bank, NH NongHyup Bank, Shinhan Bank, Woori Bank, and Hana Bank. Transactions, from payment orders to final settlement, were completed in real time, averaging just 80 seconds. The test involved 30 transactions across 17 different scenarios—such as corporate and interbank transfers—and was conducted in six currencies, including the Korean won, US dollar, and euro, with a total transaction value reaching approximately $995,000. The central bank reported that the platform operated stably throughout, despite being only partially connected to the existing banking infrastructure. Settlements using tokenized deposits were executed seamlessly, quickly, and transparently. An internal transfer of 20 million won (about $13,890) between NH NongHyup Bank and Shinhan Bank was also successfully processed via the Project Agora platform, which involved connecting to the Bank of Korea's CBDC test platform, Project Hangang. Additionally, KB Kookmin Bank and Japan's MUFG Bank tested cross-border payments using these deposit tokens—digital certificates issued by commercial banks within the pilot, not directly by the central bank. The Bank of Korea plans to continue testing payments with tokenized deposits. This follows last year's pledge by South Korean authorities to tighten regulations for won-based stablecoins, which will require approval from both the central bank and the Financial Services Commission.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Bank of Korea Reveals Results of Tokenized Deposit Testing

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片