Ethereum's "New Cypherpunk" Manifesto: A Return to the Narrative of Privacy

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-16Last updated on 2026-03-16

Abstract

Ethereum's "New Cypherpunk" Manifesto: A Return to Privacy-Centric Narratives In recent years, the crypto industry has been largely dominated by financialization, with narratives centered on asset prices, liquidity, and institutional capital inflows. However, Ethereum's recent emphasis on a "privacy renaissance" and the "new cypherpunk" ethos signals a return to core values. The movement traces back to the 1990s cypherpunk culture, which advocated using cryptography to protect individual privacy, freedom, and censorship resistance in the digital realm. Bitcoin and Ethereum emerged from this ideology, but over time, financial speculation overshadowed these foundational principles. Ethereum’s "new cypherpunk" framework modernizes this ethos with the CROPS principles: Censorship Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. It also emphasizes permissionless access, trust minimization, and decentralized collaboration. Several factors make this shift timely: advances in zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) and Layer-2 networks enable practical privacy solutions; public blockchain transparency has raised concerns about data exposure; and the rise of on-chain identities necessitates privacy-preserving systems. Ethereum’s call reflects a broader potential shift in industry narrative—from financialization to privacy, digital sovereignty, and user-controlled data. This could redefine Web3 as a infrastructure that balances transparency with selective privacy, fulfilling the cypherpunk visi...

Author: Climber, CryptoPulseLabs

In recent years, the narrative of the crypto industry has been largely dominated by financialization logic. From DeFi and NFTs to MEMEs and ETFs, market attention has increasingly focused on asset prices, liquidity, and institutional capital inflows.

However, Ethereum's official statement that "privacy is undergoing a renaissance" and its renewed emphasis on the "new cypherpunk" concept represent, to some extent, a return to core values.

Ethereum is reminding the entire industry that the original purpose of blockchain was not merely financial speculation but also safeguarding individual rights and freedoms in the digital world through cryptographic technology. Privacy, censorship resistance, open source, and security—these seemingly idealistic principles are, in fact, the deepest underlying logic of the crypto industry and perhaps the significance behind Ethereum's current "new cypherpunk" narrative.

I. From Cypherpunk to Ethereum: The Ideological Origin of the Crypto Industry

To understand why Ethereum places such importance on privacy, we must first return to the ideological starting point of the crypto industry—the cypherpunk movement.

In the 1990s, a group of programmers, cryptographers, and internet idealists discussed a question in mailing lists: Once the internet becomes social infrastructure, can individual privacy still be protected?

Their answer was: If we rely on governments and companies, privacy is almost impossible to guarantee. Therefore, the only solution is to use cryptographic technology.

This group was called "Cypherpunks." Their core idea was to use open-source code and cryptographic tools to ensure that individuals could still have privacy, freedom, and censorship resistance in the digital world.

In cypherpunk culture, there is a classic saying:

Privacy is not about secrecy; it's about selectively revealing oneself to the world.

The birth of Bitcoin was, in fact, a direct product of cypherpunk ideology. When designing Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto aimed to break free from the control of the traditional financial system through a decentralized network while giving individuals absolute control over their assets.

Ethereum expanded on this foundation. Compared to Bitcoin's single monetary system, Ethereum provided an open platform capable of running smart contracts, making decentralized applications possible.

However, over the past few years, the crypto industry has gradually undergone changes.

With the influx of capital and the expansion of the market, more and more projects began to focus on financial innovation. Financial tools such as liquidity mining, yield farming, and derivative trading developed rapidly, turning blockchain into a massive on-chain financial market.

During this process, the industry's core narrative shifted. Technological idealism was gradually replaced by financial logic, and topics like privacy and digital rights were marginalized.

Therefore, when Ethereum revisited the "cypherpunk spirit," it was essentially reminding the industry: Blockchain is not just a financial technology; behind it lies a value system for digital society.

II. "New Cypherpunk": An Upgrade of the Value System in the Web3 Era

Ethereum's proposed "new cypherpunk" is not simply a return to the 1990s cypherpunk movement but a modernization and upgrade of it.

Traditional cypherpunk was more of a technological idealist culture, emphasizing individual privacy, encrypted communication, and resistance to government surveillance.

In the Web3 era, this concept has been expanded into a more complete collaborative system.

Ethereum officially summarized a set of keywords: CROPS, which stands for Censorship Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security.

These four principles form the core of the new cypherpunk culture.

First is censorship resistance. On traditional internet platforms, the power to control content and accounts often lies with platform companies. Blockchain networks, through their decentralized architecture, allow anyone to participate freely and make it difficult for a single institution to shut down or control them.

Second is open source. The vast majority of core technologies in the crypto industry are open source, meaning anyone can review the code, audit the logic, and participate in improvements. Open source not only enhances technological transparency but also fosters a globally collaborative development model.

Third is privacy. In the Web2 era, user data was often collected by internet companies and used for commercial purposes, while users had almost no control over how their data was used. The cypherpunk philosophy holds that users should have control over their personal data.

Finally, security. Blockchain systems rely on cryptography and distributed networks to ensure security. This security does not come from centralized institutions but from mathematics and consensus mechanisms.

In addition to CROPS, the new cypherpunk also highlights several important principles, such as permissionlessness, trustlessness, and decentralized collaboration.

Permissionlessness means that anyone can deploy applications or conduct transactions on the network without needing approval from a platform.

Trustlessness involves reducing reliance on third-party institutions through code and smart contracts. Users do not need to trust a company or institution but can trust publicly transparent program logic.

These ideas together form the cultural foundation of Web3.

Therefore, Ethereum's proposal of the "new cypherpunk" is an attempt to reinforce this culture and steer the ecosystem back toward a longer-term technological vision.

III. The Privacy Renaissance: Why Now Is a Critical Moment

Ethereum believes that now may be a critical stage for the development of privacy technology, and there are multiple reasons for this.

The maturity of technological conditions is the primary factor. In recent years, zero-knowledge proof (ZK) technology has made significant progress. ZK technology allows users to prove a fact without revealing specific data, such as proving a transaction is legitimate without exposing the transaction amount or address.

This technology provides an important foundation for private transactions, private identities, and private computing.

At the same time, the development of Layer2 networks has also created new opportunities for privacy features. Some new networks are beginning to embed privacy features directly into the infrastructure, enabling users to receive higher data protection by default.

Another factor is the real-world issues arising from on-chain transparency. Many people initially believe blockchain is anonymous when they first encounter it. However, most public chain data is completely public. As long as an address is known, all its transaction records can be traced.

With the development of on-chain analysis tools, many institutions can now identify the entities behind addresses through data analysis.

This means that if a user holds significant assets or frequently transacts on-chain, their activities are likely to be tracked over the long term.

Therefore, more and more people are beginning to realize that blockchain needs not only transparency but also **optional privacy**.

Additionally, the rise of digital identity is a driving force. As the Web3 ecosystem develops, more social relationships, asset information, and on-chain identities are being recorded on the blockchain. If all this data is completely public, it could pose security risks.

For example, some users may not want to disclose their asset size or trading strategies, as this could lead to targeted attacks.

Therefore, the future of Web3 will likely require a new identity system: one that can prove user identity and reputation without exposing excessive personal information.

Zero-knowledge proofs and privacy computing technologies are key tools for achieving this goal.

Conclusion: Privacy May Be the Next Core Narrative

When Ethereum reemphasizes the "new cypherpunk" and the privacy renaissance, it is not just a cultural expression but may also signal a shift in the industry's narrative.

In recent years, the crypto market has primarily focused on financial innovation and capital flows. However, with technological advancements and changing user needs, topics such as privacy, digital identity, and data sovereignty may once again become industry focal points. If privacy technology can integrate with DeFi, social networks, and digital identity systems, the future form of Web3 could undergo significant changes.

In this scenario, blockchain is no longer just a transparent financial ledger but a digital infrastructure that ensures security and trustworthiness while protecting individual privacy. In a sense, this is the future envisioned by the cypherpunks three decades ago. Today, Ethereum is trying to bring this ideal into reality.

Related Questions

QWhat is the core concept of the 'New Cypherpunk' movement as proposed by Ethereum?

AThe core concept of the 'New Cypherpunk' movement is summarized by the acronym CROPS, which stands for Censorship Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. It represents a modernization and expansion of the original cypherpunk ideals for the Web3 era, emphasizing a complete system of collaboration.

QAccording to the article, what was the primary concern of the original cypherpunk movement in the 1990s?

AThe primary concern of the original cypherpunk movement was whether personal privacy could be protected as the internet became a social infrastructure. They believed the only solution was to use cryptographic technology, as relying on governments and corporations would not guarantee privacy.

QWhat technological advancement is cited as a key factor enabling the current 'privacy renaissance'?

AZero-Knowledge Proof (ZK) technology is cited as a key enabling factor. It has seen significant progress, allowing users to prove a fact is true (like a transaction's validity) without revealing the underlying private data (such as the amount or addresses involved).

QHow does the article differentiate between the traditional cypherpunk culture and the 'New Cypherpunk'?

AThe traditional cypherpunk culture was a form of technical idealism focused on individual privacy, encrypted communication, and resistance to government surveillance. The 'New Cypherpunk' upgrades this into a more complete Web3-era collaboration system based on principles like CROPS, permissionlessness, trustlessness, and decentralized collaboration.

QWhy does the article suggest that 'privacy' is becoming a critical issue now in the blockchain space?

APrivacy is becoming critical due to the maturity of technologies like ZK-proofs, the development of Layer2 networks that can embed privacy features, the reality that public blockchains are transparent and user activity can be tracked and analyzed, and the rise of digital identities which require a balance between proving credibility and protecting personal information.

Related Reads

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit20m ago

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit20m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit28m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit28m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit36m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit36m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit39m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit39m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit42m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit42m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片