Abstract
The article "Dialogue with BlackRock's Digital Asset Head: How Do Tokenized Stocks Work?" features a discussion with industry experts including Robert Mitchnick (BlackRock), Rob Hadick (Dragonfly), and Noah Levine (a16z). The conversation explores the evolution and mechanics of tokenized assets, particularly stocks.
Key takeaways highlight that tokenization is primarily an "access" story, enabling broader investor participation in traditionally hard-to-reach asset classes, rather than just an efficiency improvement. Stablecoins are evolving from payment tools into foundational financial infrastructure, acting as an entry point for investment and asset management. Most current "tokenized stock" offerings are transitional, often representing derivative-like structures rather than true on-chain ownership, with limitations like transfer restrictions due to whitelisting and compliance requirements.
The discussion covers three main structures for tokenized equities: SPV-based models, rights-based tokens (e.g., Securitize’s approach), and native on-chain issuance (e.g., Superstate). The latter is seen as the most promising for enabling true composability and functionality like collateralization.
Regulatory clarity and infrastructure development are critical for advancing toward permissionless, liquid markets. Initiatives like the NYSE’s partnership with Securitize for 24/7 trading are noted, though the core demand is for improved asset utilization efficiency, not just extended ho...
Author: Payment 201
Speaker: Pet Berisha (Co-founder of Tokenized)
Guests: Rob Hadick (Dragonfly GP), Robert Mitchnick (BlackRock Head of Digital Assets), Noah Levine (Andreessen Horowitz Partner)
Timeline:
00:00 Introduction
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"What is the three main structural types of tokenized equity mentioned in the article?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The three main structural types are: 1) SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) structure, where an SPV buys a stock asset and tokenizes the SPV for distribution to investors; 2) 'Rights-based tokens', where the asset is issued off-chain and tokenized for wallet users to hold and gain exposure; 3) Fully on-chain issued stock, where new securities are issued natively on-chain, granting direct ownership of the underlying stock."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"According to the discussion, what is the core value proposition of tokenization, as opposed to just an efficiency story?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The core value proposition of tokenization is not just efficiency improvement, but rather expanding investment access ('access story'). It allows crypto-native users to access a wider range of traditional assets and enables more global investors to enter a unified market, essentially expanding the demand side rather than just optimizing the supply side."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What is identified as the core bottleneck for the liquidity of current tokenized assets?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The core bottleneck for liquidity is the whitelist and compliance restrictions. As long as assets must be transferred between restricted addresses, true liquidity and DeFi composability cannot be achieved."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do the panelists differentiate the use cases for stablecoins versus tokenized deposits?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Stablecoins are seen as serving different scenarios,偏向跨境、加密市场和美元化需求 (leaning towards cross-border, crypto markets, and dollarization needs). Tokenized deposits are seen as serving different scenarios,偏向银行体系内部的资金流转和效率优化 (leaning towards internal fund flow and efficiency optimization within the banking system). They serve different user groups and will likely form a structure with multiple forms of capital coexistence."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What long-term change in market structure is predicted if all assets are on-chain in 5-7 years?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The market structure is predicted to become significantly flatter. The current transaction process involves many intermediaries (brokers, exchanges, clearinghouses, custodians, etc.), and tokenization can compress these layers. The result will be lower costs for investors, expanded reach for asset management institutions, and an opportunity for crypto infrastructure to enter the mainstream financial system."}}]}Related Questions
QWhat is the three main structural types of tokenized equity mentioned in the article?
AThe three main structural types are: 1) SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) structure, where an SPV buys a stock asset and tokenizes the SPV for distribution to investors; 2) 'Rights-based tokens', where the asset is issued off-chain and tokenized for wallet users to hold and gain exposure; 3) Fully on-chain issued stock, where new securities are issued natively on-chain, granting direct ownership of the underlying stock.
QAccording to the discussion, what is the core value proposition of tokenization, as opposed to just an efficiency story?
AThe core value proposition of tokenization is not just efficiency improvement, but rather expanding investment access ('access story'). It allows crypto-native users to access a wider range of traditional assets and enables more global investors to enter a unified market, essentially expanding the demand side rather than just optimizing the supply side.
QWhat is identified as the core bottleneck for the liquidity of current tokenized assets?
AThe core bottleneck for liquidity is the whitelist and compliance restrictions. As long as assets must be transferred between restricted addresses, true liquidity and DeFi composability cannot be achieved.
QHow do the panelists differentiate the use cases for stablecoins versus tokenized deposits?
AStablecoins are seen as serving different scenarios,偏向跨境、加密市场和美元化需求 (leaning towards cross-border, crypto markets, and dollarization needs). Tokenized deposits are seen as serving different scenarios,偏向银行体系内部的资金流转和效率优化 (leaning towards internal fund flow and efficiency optimization within the banking system). They serve different user groups and will likely form a structure with multiple forms of capital coexistence.
QWhat long-term change in market structure is predicted if all assets are on-chain in 5-7 years?
AThe market structure is predicted to become significantly flatter. The current transaction process involves many intermediaries (brokers, exchanges, clearinghouses, custodians, etc.), and tokenization can compress these layers. The result will be lower costs for investors, expanded reach for asset management institutions, and an opportunity for crypto infrastructure to enter the mainstream financial system.
Related Reads
Could Solana Be The Best Spot Trading Market Globally? This Crypto Pundit Thinks So
Despite ongoing market volatility pushing Solana's price to around $68, crypto pundit Chase, a Solana mobile employee, expresses strong optimism. He argues that after evaluating market structure, Solana has the infrastructure to become the world's best spot trading market and is likely to generate more revenue than any other blockchain. He emphasizes that expanding its retail and trader ecosystem is key for growth. Supporting this view, Solana's network shows robust activity, with its Total Capital Generated (TCG) reaching a new weekly high of $73.6 million. Furthermore, Solana has overtaken Ethereum to become the leading blockchain by tokenized stock market cap, which surged over 54% to $724.1 million recently. At the time of writing, SOL was trading at $64, down nearly 9% in a day.
bitcoinist10m ago
bitcoinist10m ago
From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?
The article explores the sudden shift in WeChat's strategy towards AI assistants from mobile phone manufacturers, transitioning from strict opposition to active collaboration.
For over a year, WeChat fiercely resisted attempts by phone AI assistants (like ByteDance's Doubao in late 2025) to control its features via GUI automation ("simulated clicking"), citing security and data control concerns. This stance created a significant barrier for system-level AI integration.
Now, Tencent has initiated A2A (Agent-to-Agent) partnerships with major phone brands like Honor, Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo. This model allows a phone's system AI (e.g., Honor's YOYO) to parse a user's voice command and send a structured request directly to WeChat's own internal AI agent via secure APIs. WeChat then executes the action (e.g., sending a message) and returns the result.
The article attributes Tencent's "change of face" to strategic pressure. While leading in social app usage, Tencent trails rivals like ByteDance and Alibaba in standalone AI app popularity. WeChat, with its vast mini-program ecosystem, is Tencent's key asset for an AI comeback. The upcoming WeChat AI agent aims to handle tasks like booking and payments within the app. However, phone system assistants remain the primary AI entry point for most users. The A2A collaboration allows Tencent to extend WeChat's AI reach to this crucial system layer while maintaining control over its core functions and data.
For phone manufacturers, embracing A2A is a pragmatic move. The GUI route proved unviable due to WeChat's blocks. A2A offers a compliant path to integrate a vital service, enhancing their AI assistants' usefulness. It allows them to focus on developing their own AI ecosystems for other services while cooperating on WeChat access. The collaboration is framed as a mutual, strategic necessity: Tencent gains a distribution channel, and manufacturers gain a key functionality.
The partnership relies on a "dual authorization" mechanism for security, requiring both user and app consent for each action. While questions about long-term data privacy practices remain, experts note A2A is more secure and compliant than GUI automation.
Ultimately, this cooperation is seen as a tentative, calculated truce. Tencent's long-term goal is to make WeChat an AI-powered "service OS." Phone manufacturers aim to make their system AI the central user interface. Their paths may converge or clash in the future, but for now, the A2A deal represents the opening chapter in the battle for the AI-era user入口, driven by necessity and strategic calculus on both sides.
marsbit55m ago
marsbit55m ago
From SpaceX's IPO to the Future of Crypto: Which Crypto Sectors Will Host the Trillion-Dollar Narrative?
From the SpaceX IPO, which targets a $750 billion raise at a $1.77 trillion valuation, we can extrapolate capital flow trends relevant to crypto. The focus shifts from speculative narratives to foundational infrastructure and real-world asset (RWA) integration.
Key crypto sectors poised to benefit include:
1. **AI Infrastructure**: The narrative is moving from consumer-facing AI applications to underlying, scarce resources like compute power and decentralized GPU networks (e.g., TAO, RENDER, AKT, IO). These protocols are positioning as the essential "picks and shovels" providers for the AI economy.
2. **Real-World Assets (RWA)**: Beyond tokenized treasury bonds, RWA's future lies in on-chain equity and pre-IPO assets like SpaceX. This could democratize access to high-growth assets and reshape global capital flows, benefiting infrastructure projects like ONDO, LINK, and Plume that facilitate issuance, data, and liquidity.
3. **Core Financial Infrastructure**: Stablecoins, payment networks, and DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) are critical for settling the future on-chain economy. Their role expands from internal trading tools to foundational layers for global finance, AI systems, and real-world asset networks, leading to potential value reassessment.
In summary, the next cycle may prioritize long-term infrastructure value—AI compute, asset tokenization networks, and settlement layers—over short-lived application hype, mirroring the broader market's shift towards funding the foundational systems of the future.
marsbit2h ago
marsbit2h ago
Bitcoin Drops To $59,000 For First Time Since 2024: Crypto’s Total Value Sheds $2 Trillion Since October
Bitcoin's decline accelerated on Friday, dropping to approximately $59,685, its lowest point since October 2024. This sell-off has extended across the broader cryptocurrency market, erasing over $2 trillion in value from its October 2025 peak of around $4.2 trillion. Major factors cited include significant outflows from Bitcoin ETFs and renewed geopolitical tensions.
Other major cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and Dogecoin, also experienced significant drops, with Ethereum falling over 12% to its lowest level since April 2025. Market sentiment has deteriorated sharply, with the crypto Fear & Greed Index indicating "extreme fear."
Bitcoin is now down more than 50% from its all-time high of about $126,000 in October, with its market capitalization falling from roughly $2.5 trillion to $1.2 trillion. Looking ahead, some traders project Bitcoin could recover to around $65,000 by year-end, but this would still leave it far below its previous peak, suggesting a full recovery from current losses may not be imminent.
bitcoinist2h ago
bitcoinist2h ago
Hot Articles
The privacy + payments narrative has been the primary catalyst driving rotation and substantial price gains in privacy coins such as DASH and XMR.
16.6k Total ViewsPublished 2026.01.20Updated 2026.01.20
ADA's Ouroboros Leios mainnet is expected to launch in 2026, and the hard fork to Protocol Version 11 is planned for Q1 2026.
40.5k Total ViewsPublished 2026.02.10Updated 2026.02.12
Ordinals/Runes continue to drive block fee revenue and developer activity, and are seen as the starting point for Bitcoin's "native asset issuance".
26.7k Total ViewsPublished 2026.04.29Updated 2026.04.29
