Crypto’s ‘superapp’ race is on as industry enters aggregation era: Report

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-16Last updated on 2025-12-16

Abstract

Crypto is entering an "aggregation era," where the primary value lies not in base protocols but in platforms that own the user relationship, according to a Delphi Digital report. Major exchanges are competing to become the default gateway for services like trading, payments, staking, NFTs, and DeFi. Binance exemplifies the monolithic "superapp" model, integrating numerous services—trading, Earn, lending, payments, and a Web3 wallet—into a single interface. In contrast, Kraken adopts a federated "constellation" approach, offering specialized apps like Inky for memecoins and Krak for payments, while maintaining unified backend infrastructure. Other players like Coinbase, OKX, and Bybit are also expanding into smart wallets, onchain discovery, and DeFi, positioning themselves as key distribution layers. The race centers on controlling user discovery and interface dominance, with regulatory classification and future user adoption hanging in the balance.

According to a new report from Delphi Digital, crypto platforms are quietly morphing into distribution layers for everything from trading and payments to onchain apps and yield.

The “superapp” vision that reshaped consumer finance in Asia is now colliding with Western UX preferences and clearer regulation, and exchanges are betting that whoever controls the primary interface will control the next wave of users.

The aggregation era arrives

The report concludes that crypto is entering an “aggregation era,” where the real power no longer sits with base protocols but with whoever owns the user relationship. In other words, the place where people first log in, move money, and discover products.

In that world, exchanges and large platforms are racing to become the default gateway; the app that distributes liquidity, order flow, stablecoins, staking, non-fungible tokens, gaming, and so on.

Related: Binance hints at stock perps in push to join global tokenized equities race

Binance’s one‐app strategy

Delphi highlights Binance as the clearest example of the monolithic superapp play, arguing it mirrors the WeChat‐style “one interface, infinite utility” model.

Source: Delphi Digital

What began as a pure trading venue has steadily swallowed adjacent behaviors: spot and derivatives trading, Earn products, lending and staking, payments via Binance Pay, a Web3 wallet, and institutional services, all nested inside one dense interface.

Related: Binance’s new ‘Junior’ app draws mixed reactions over kids entering crypto

Kraken’s constellation approach

By contrast, Delphi describes Kraken as pursuing a federated “constellation” model built on a shared spine of liquidity, custody, and identity.

Instead of forcing every user into one crowded app, Kraken is rolling out specialist front ends: Inky, an entertainment‐first memecoin app; Krak, remittances and payments with stablecoins and yield, and Kraken Pro for classic, deep‐chart trading.

Source: Delphi Digital

The idea, according to Delphi, is to unbundle the UI but rebundle everything behind the scenes, so Kraken remains the underlying distribution rail even as user experiences fragment.

Related: Kraken adds Backed Finance to 2025 acquisition streak, brings xStocks in-house

How Coinbase, OKX, and others fit in

Delphi found that other majors are edging toward the same distribution‐layer role, even if they avoid the “superapp” label.

Coinbase has pushed deeper into smart wallets, onchain discovery, staking, and payments, positioning itself as a regulated, consumer‐friendly hub for both trading and Web3 access.

OKX, Bybit, and others are pairing centralized trading with in‐app Web3 wallets, NFT markets, and DeFi access, effectively bundling onchain rails around their existing user bases.

Related: Standard Chartered, Coinbase deepen alliance to build institutional crypto infrastructure

What’s at stake?

Delphi argues that beneath the product launches is a bigger fight over who controls discovery for third‐party apps and protocols, and how regulators classify these platforms.

A single, all-in-one superapp consolidates risk and oversight in one place, offering unmatched convenience. A federated, multi‐app model spreads out user interfaces while keeping control of the plumbing.

Whichever design wins could go a long way to deciding who becomes crypto’s default distribution layer in the next cycle, and on whose terms the next hundred million users join.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片