Crypto Sector Faces Tighter Rules On Hidden Investors In Thailand

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-04-09Last updated on 2026-04-09

Abstract

Thai's Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed stricter rules requiring regulatory approval not only for direct major shareholders of crypto businesses but also for indirect financial backers, including those providing funding through guarantees or contractual arrangements. The measure aims to prevent capital linked to unlawful activities from entering licensed crypto firms, as part of a broader effort to strengthen anti-money laundering controls in both traditional and digital finance. The proposal, open for public comment until April 22, reflects a regional trend of increased regulatory scrutiny over crypto ownership and funding in Asia.

Thai crypto exchanges could soon face stricter scrutiny over who is actually bankrolling their major shareholders — not just who owns shares on paper.

A Net Wide Enough To Catch Indirect Backers

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission put forward a proposal this week that would require regulatory approval not only for direct major shareholders in crypto businesses, but also for anyone providing financial support to those shareholders behind the scenes.

That includes backers working through share acquisitions, guarantors, and parties to contractual arrangements that effectively give them a funding role.

According to the regulator, the new rules are designed to cut off capital flows that may be tied to unlawful activities — money that could expose licensed firms to legal trouble or damage their standing in the market.

Source: SEC Thailand

The proposal arrives as part of a wider push by Thai authorities to tighten controls across both traditional and digital finance. Reports indicate Thai crypto platforms froze 10,000 accounts earlier this year as part of an anti-money laundering drive.

A separate campaign targeting so-called “gray money” was launched in January, covering physical markets alongside digital ones.

Who Gets Reviewed — And Who Gets A Pass

Under the proposed framework, the approval requirement would extend to financial supporters of legal entities that themselves hold shares in crypto operators — not just the operators’ direct shareholders.

The SEC said the rules would apply to anyone whose financial role gives them, in substance, the standing of a major funder, regardless of how that arrangement is structured.

There is one notable exception. If a major shareholder happens to be a government body — a ministry, public agency, or similar entity — the SEC said it would only look at ownership at that entity’s level.

BTCUSD now trading at $71,103. Chart: TradingView

Officials said those bodies are already under government supervision, making a deeper review unnecessary.

The proposal is open for public comment until April 22.

A Pattern Taking Shape Across Asia

Thailand is not acting alone. Based on reports, South Korea’s regulators are weighing a separate but related measure that would cap ownership stakes in crypto exchanges at 20%.

The back-to-back moves suggest that Asian financial watchdogs are paying closer attention to who controls — and who funds — the companies handling public crypto transactions.

For Thai crypto firms, the practical impact of the new rules will depend heavily on how regulators define terms like “significant funding” once the consultation period closes and a final version is drafted.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of Thailand's new SEC proposal for crypto businesses?

AThe main purpose is to cut off capital flows that may be tied to unlawful activities by requiring regulatory approval not only for direct major shareholders but also for anyone providing significant financial support to them behind the scenes.

QBesides direct shareholders, who else would be subject to regulatory approval under the proposed rules?

AThe approval requirement would extend to anyone providing financial support to major shareholders, including backers working through share acquisitions, guarantors, and parties to contractual arrangements that give them a funding role, as well as financial supporters of legal entities that hold shares in crypto operators.

QWhat is the one notable exception to the proposed approval requirements?

AIf a major shareholder is a government body such as a ministry or public agency, the SEC would only look at ownership at that entity's level, as these bodies are already under government supervision.

QHow does this Thai regulatory move fit into a broader regional trend?

AIt is part of a pattern across Asia, with reports indicating that South Korea's regulators are also weighing a measure to cap ownership stakes in crypto exchanges at 20%, showing Asian financial watchdogs are paying closer attention to who controls and funds crypto companies.

QUntil when is the Thai SEC's proposal open for public comment?

AThe proposal is open for public comment until April 22.

Related Reads

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News1h ago

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News1h ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News1h ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片