Crypto Analytics Firm Dune Axes 25% Of Employees Amid Strategic Overhaul

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-15Last updated on 2026-05-15

Abstract

Crypto data analytics firm Dune is cutting 25% of its employees as part of a strategic restructuring, its CEO Fredrik Haga announced. The layoffs, affecting around 37-38 people from a team of roughly 150, aim to sharpen the company's focus on its core data products and a major push to build tools for institutional investors. Haga cited the growing shift of traditional assets like currencies and stocks onto blockchains as a key opportunity. The company is also doubling down on artificial intelligence, promoting a tool that allows AI systems to interact directly with its platform to create dashboards without SQL knowledge. Haga emphasized the move is strategic, not financial, and that Dune remains well-capitalized. The cuts occur amid a wider wave of layoffs across crypto and tech in 2026, with companies like Coinbase, Block, Gemini, and Crypto.com also reducing headcounts, often citing AI-driven efficiency gains. Over 5,000 jobs have been cut at major crypto firms this year alone.

Dune’s CEO announced Thursday that the crypto data company is cutting a quarter of its staff as part of a broader push to build out data tools for institutional investors — a segment the company sees as a major growth opportunity as more traditional financial assets move onto blockchain networks.

Betting On Institutional Demand

Fredrik Haga, Dune’s co-founder and chief executive, said the company plans to invest heavily in products and services aimed at institutions, pointing to what he described as a growing shift of currencies, stocks, bonds, and commodities onto blockchain infrastructure.

Haga also said Dune is going all-in on artificial intelligence, highlighting the company’s Model Context Protocol — a tool that lets AI systems interact directly with Dune’s platform.

According to Haga, the technology now allows teams and automated agents to build dashboards and data workflows without any knowledge of SQL or data infrastructure.

We’re restructuring Dune to sharpen our focus around the core data products thousands of customers across the crypto industry rely on. That unfortunately means we’ve let 25% of the team go this week. These are exceptional people I can wholeheartedly recommend — ping me if you’re...

— hagaetc (@hagaetc) May 14, 2026

Haga did not say how many people were affected. Dune’s LinkedIn page lists around 150 employees, which would put the number of departures somewhere around 37 to 38 people. The company remains well capitalized, Haga said.

One Cut Among Many

Dune’s announcement lands in the middle of a broader wave of job cuts hitting both crypto and tech companies this year.

Coinbase eliminated about 700 positions earlier this month — roughly 14% of its workforce — also citing a shift toward AI-driven operations.

BTCUSD currently trading at $80,499. Chart: TradingView

Crypto news outlet DL News shut down entirely on Friday, with leadership pointing to declining web traffic as AI tools increasingly answer questions that users once searched for directly.

Block Inc., the payments and crypto company led by Jack Dorsey, carried out the largest single round of layoffs in crypto so far in 2026, cutting around 4,000 workers — nearly half its staff — back in February.

Exchanges Gemini and Crypto.com each reduced their headcounts earlier this year as well, with both companies citing efficiency gains from AI adoption.

Across the wider US tech sector, the scale of cuts has been significant. Data from Layoffs.fyi shows 137 companies have shed close to 109,000 jobs in 2026 so far.

A Narrower Focus Going Forward

Haga framed the layoffs not as a financial retreat but as a deliberate sharpening of the company’s direction.

Dune’s core data products are used by thousands of customers across the crypto industry, he said, and the restructuring is meant to protect and build on that foundation.

The company’s total job losses add to what reports indicate is now more than 5,000 positions cut across major crypto firms this year alone.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

Hyperliquid, a cryptocurrency derivatives platform, is facing formal complaints from two major traditional exchanges, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the New York Stock Exchange). The firms have jointly approached the U.S. Congress and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), urging stricter regulatory oversight of Hyperliquid's operations. The action highlights growing tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto-native platforms in the derivatives market.

链捕手39m ago

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

链捕手39m ago

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit54m ago

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit54m ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手54m ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手54m ago

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

Bitcoin's recent recovery from February lows is approaching a critical supply cluster between $84,000 and $88,000, which holds the largest concentration of Bitcoin supply on the current chart. This zone represents the cost basis for short-term holders (investors who bought within the last 155 days) and is stacked with "trapped" sellers who bought near those levels and are now at breakeven. Technical analysis suggests the rally faces significant resistance in this area. Two primary scenarios are outlined: a direct push into the $84k-$86k zone followed by a rejection and pullback to $70,000 support, or a more volatile path involving a dip before testing the supply cluster. A weekly close above $84,000 would weaken the bearish rejection case, but a decisive break above $86,900-$88,000 is needed for a stronger bullish confirmation. Bitcoin is currently trading around $80,430.

bitcoinist1h ago

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

bitcoinist1h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures